Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP16-0094
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/07/2016 | KROBLES1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/07/2016 | AHINES2 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approved | |
| 10/12/2016 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Principal Planner PROJECT: Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen Development Package (1st Review) DP16-0094 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 14, 2016 DUE DATE: November 01, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is June 13, 2017. 1. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide the following case numbers adjacent to the title block on all sheets; D09-0010, D11-0001, DP12-0113, DP13-0227, DP13-0228, DP15-0039, DP15-0103, DP15-0138, DP16-0032, S08-100, S11-043, S15-027, S16-027 & C9-06-32. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP16-0094, adjacent to the title block on each sheet and in the calculations text block on sheet two. Also, all DP case numbers must be listed next to the title block of al plan sheets and if applicable any other relevant case numbers related to this specific project. 2. This comment was not fully addressed. Zoning note 8 references "PUD", this is not a PUD. In COMMENT: Zoning note 8 must be revised to state the information as noted for the permitted uses based on the PAD document. Revise zoning note 8 as required, see page 55 of the PAD 15 document for additional info. (The Specific use standards listed in the note do not apply) 3. This easement will need to be abandoned prior to approval of the development package. COMMENT: Per the current plat, there is an existing right of way easement dkt 2449 at pg 122 over the south and west portion of lot 2 that may impact the proposed development. It is not known if this easement has been vacated or abandoned. Draw and label this easement on the site sheets. If the easement has been vacated or abandoned provide documentation with the next submittal. If the easement has to be vacated or abandoned, it must be completed prior to final approval of the DP. 4. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show the required 2'-6" dimension required from the short term rack north to the proposed building, see UDC 7.4.9.B.2.g. Once the above comments are addressed Zoning will provide an over-the-counter review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 10/13/2016 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/13/2016 | PBAUGHM1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Approved | |
| 10/14/2016 | SSHIELD1 | HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/27/2016 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/31/2016 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT DP16-0094 Popeye's 10/31/2016 () Final Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () Approval (X) Denied () Rezoning history on site () Annexation history on site () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: MM DATE: 10/31/2016 COMMENTS DP16-0094 under The Bridges Planned Area Development states that under Section C.6 of the Design Review Committee and Design Guidelines on Pg. 107 states the following: The DRC shall review all proposed architectural plans. Through a self-certification process, the DRC will provide a letter of approval to the city at the time of plan submittal. The applicant must provide a letter of approval from the Design Review Committee for all proposed architectural plans, at the time of plan resubmittal. Please Submit required DRC letter for plan review. |
| 11/03/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 11/08/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/08/2016 | ARUIZ1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |