Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP16-0094
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/15/2016 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/16/2016 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Passed | Plans do not need review by RWRD per the Sewer Submittal Review Worksheet. |
| 06/16/2016 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Passed | Plans do not need review by Addressing per Submittal Review Worksheet. |
| 06/17/2016 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 06/21/2016 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | Since the above referenced project is not a Tentative or Final Plat review, our section does not have any comments to make on this. Sherry Hyde Sr. Property Technician Pima County Assessor's Office (520)724-6629 |
| 06/23/2016 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: June 23, 2016 DUE DATE: July 13, 2016 SUBJECT: Popeye's Restraunt TO: Erin Harris LOCATION: 1058 E Tucson Marketplace Blvd REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM ACTIVITY: DP16-0094 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. The following items need to be addressed: 1) Per AM 2-06.4.3 please add the case number (DP16-0094). 2) Keynote 12 is called out on sheet 4 at the southeast corner of the building in error. It appears a sidewalk scupper should be called out in this location instead of a "3:1 Max from top of curb to grading limits with slope vegetation." Per TSM 7-01.4.3E and development package note 42 on page 1 please update by calling out sidewalk scuppers wherever roof drainage would otherwise pass over the pedestrian way. 3) There is a keynote 4 callout at the northwest corner area, near the building that seems like it is out of place. Please update accordingly on sheet 3. 4) Keynote 14 on sheet 3 refers to a short term bicycle detail on sheet 4. Please update this to refer to a sheet that contains this detail. 5) Cross Section A/5 on sheet 3 refers to a cross section on sheet 5 that calls out "future pavement by others." The aerials on City of Tucson online mapping show this as existing pavement. Please update detail description on sheet 5 accordingly. 6) The grades on sheet 4, located northeast of the dumpster enclosures, do not provide for a 1% slope as called out. Please update spot grade callouts accordingly. The line work in the legend for the proposed wall does not match the line work used on sheet 4 to represent the walls. Please update accordingly. 7) Keynote 15 on sheet 4 calls out a curb access ramp "in public right-of-way." Please correct the property ownership to reflect private property. 8) Per item B on page 28 of the PAD document, "It is expected that the development of the site will establish a continuous pedestrian perimeter sidewalk/path along each of the existing public streets adjoining the site." The most recent aerial photos shows this parcel is missing a stretch of sidewalk along its western frontage next to the public street. Please update the plans sheets to either show existing or proposed sidewalk along this stretch of public street per the PAD. If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 06/29/2016 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal because of prior approval for the Tucson Marketplace/Bridges PAD. Thank you. Tom Martinez ADOT |
| 06/29/2016 | AHINES2 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | June 14, 2016 Land Development Consultants 11811 N. Tatum Blvd., Ste #1051 Phoenix, AZ 85028 Attn: Nick Fore SUBJECT: Water Availability for project: 1058 E. Tucson Marketplace Rd, APN: 132130890, Case #: WA1988, T-14, R-14, SEC-30, Lots: 2, Location Code: TUC, Total Area: 2.8ac Zoning: PAD-15 WATER SUPPLY Tucson Water will provide water service to this project based on the subject zoning of the above parcels. Tucson Water has an assured water supply (AWS) designation from the State of Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR). An AWS designation means Tucson Water has met the criteria established by ADWR for demonstration of a 100-year water supply - it does not mean that water service is currently available to the subject project. WATER SERVICE The approval of water meter applications is subject to the current availability of water service at the time an application is received. The developer shall be required to submit a water master plan identifying, but not limited to: 1) Water Use; 2) Fire Flow Requirements; 3) Offsite/Onsite Water Facilities; 4) Loops and Proposed Connection Points to Existing Water System; and 5) Easements/Common Areas. Any specific area plan fees, protected main/facility fees and/or other needed facilities' cost, are to be paid by the developer. If the existing water system is not capable of meeting the requirements of the proposed development, the developer shall be financially responsible for modifying or enhancing the existing water system to meet those needs. This letter shall be null and void two years from the date of issuance. Issuance of this letter is not to be construed as agency approval of a water plan or as containing construction review comments relative to conflicts with existing water lines and the proposed development. If you have any questions, please call New Development at 791-4718. Sincerely, Richard A. Sarti, P.E. Engineering Manager Tucson Water Department RS:ka CC:File |
| 06/29/2016 | AHINES2 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Approved | June 29, 2016 City of Tucson CDRC Attn: Patricia Gehlen, Manager 201 N. Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ 85701 RE: SWG Plan Review for The Bridges - Popeye's Louisiana Kitchen Development Plan Review - CDRC DP16-0094 Dear Ms. Gehlen: Southwest Gas Corporation (SWG) has no objection to the development of the above-mentioned project. Existing natural gas facilities are located in adjacent rights-of-way to the area of development and may be affected by construction of this project; specifically, an existing 4" gas main is located within the right-of-way of Tucson Marketplace Blvd. and may be impacted by pavement saw cutting along the North edge of Tucson Marketplace Blvd, along with driveway grading into development Blue Stake and potholing are suggested for best accuracy when locating SWG facilities. Please be aware that SWG requires a minimum one-foot separation from distribution facilities and any proposed structures and two-foot separation from high pressure gas facilities. SWG requests the contractor use caution when working in the vicinity of gas facilities and protect and support gas facilities per Blue Stake requirements. SWG also requests that no trees be planted within close proximity to gas facilities due to root intrusion; therefore, SWG requires all tree placements have a minimum eight-foot clearance from the tree center line to existing or proposed gas facilities. Shrubs and bushes may be planted within the eight-foot clearance zone. All information is provided for reference use only. Please note that it is the responsibility of excavators or those developers planning excavation to verify actual field conditions in advance of construction so that requests for gas service or any potential issues can be addressed in a timely manner, including payment for conflict mitigation if applicable. Please include SWG in all future development plan submittals of this project. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact me at (520) 794-6049 or TUCSWGDevReview@swgas.com. Sincerely, Shawn Stoner Engineering Technician Southern Arizona Division Enc: SWG Contact Information and Excavators Responsibilities (pdf) |
| 07/12/2016 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1) Revise the plans to provide a screen wall for screening along the Park Avenue frontage. Bridges PAD C.2.2.C.3.f (P.51) Street landscape borders and screening of parking lots along Kino Parkway and Park Avenue shall be accomplished with low screen walls. 2) Provide landscaping/dust control along the Park Avenue frontage of Lot 2. UDC 7.6.4.E All disturbed, grubbed, graded, or bladed areas not otherwise improved must be landscaped, reseeded, or treated with a layer of inorganic or organic ground cover to help reduce dust pollution. 3) Add the DP case number to the landscape plans. |
| 07/12/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Revise the site utility drawing to include the proposed invert and rim elevation of the next upstream manhole. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 07/12/2016 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/12/2016 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov >>> DSD_CDRC 6/16/2016 1:22 PM >>> Dear Reviewers: This is an electronic distribution for a CDRC Development Plan review. The applicable case numbers are: CDRC Development Plan: DP16-0094 Existing and Proposed Zoning: PAD-15 The Bridges Proposed Use: Restaurant - Food Service Due Date: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 |
| 07/12/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Reqs Change | The Development Package has been reviewed on behalf of Environmental Services Dept. and the following will need to be addressed on the resubmittal: 1. Provide a general note specifying the anticipated method of collection and frequency based upon the calculated waste stream tonnage from Table 1 for the intended use per TSM 8-01.4.0.B. 2. Show the turning maneuvers of the collection vehicle through the site using the turning templates shown in TSM Section 8, Figure 7 and as discussed in TSM 8-01.5.3.E. The turning templates used on the plans do not meet the standard radius dimensions. 3. Revise the Dumpster Detail on Sheet 5 to include the correct dimensions of the enclosure and apron. Add the missing dimensions from TSM Figure 3A to demonstrate the enclosure meets the requirements of TSM Section 8 Figure 3A. The enclosure provided on the plans is smaller than the standard enclosure and needs to be enlarged. Provide adequate clearance inside the enclosure and at the gate openings. Add a note that the enclosure is to be constructed per Figure 3A in TSM Section 8. If there are any questions, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net www.perryengineering.net Image result for facebook email signature http://findicons.com/files/icons/2052/social_network/32/linkedin.png Ken Perry, Principal PE, LEED AP 505 W. Wetmore Road Tucson, Arizona 85705 Office 520.620.9870, ext. 1 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This E-mail and any attachments are private and are intended only for the use of the addressee, and may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, distribution, or copying of this E-mail and/or the attachments is strictly prohibited. |
| 07/12/2016 | AHINES2 | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | I have no issues with this plan. Thank you, Kara Curtis Community Service Officer Tucson Police Department Operations Division Midtown 1100 S. Alvernon Tucson, AZ 85711 kara.curtis@tucsonaz.gov (520) 837-7428 |
| 07/13/2016 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields - Principal Planner PDSD Zoning review Section PROJECT: Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen Development Package (1st Review) DP16-0094 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July13, 2016 DUE DATE: July 13, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is June 6, 2017. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.6 - Provide a blank three-inch by five-inch block in the lower right corner of the plan adjacent to the title block on the first sheet of the development package for use by Pima County Addressing. 1. COMMENT: Provide the 3" x 5" block on the cover sheet only, as noted by the standard above. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat; 2. COMMENT: Revise the brief legal description in the title block of all plan sheets. The description provided in the title block is for the old plat. This overall development has been re-platted and new lot numbers have been recorded. Review the new plat or add the following "A portion of Lot 2, TUCSON MARKETPLACE PHASE 4, recorded Subdivision Plat for Sequence Number SQ20153240735" . 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 3. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP16-0094, adjacent to the title block on each sheet and in the calculations text block on sheet two. Also, all DP case numbers must be listed next to the title block of al plan sheets and if applicable any other relevant case numbers related to this specific project. 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 2-06.4.2.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and 2-06.4.2.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 4. COMMENT: Draw and label Kino Parkway on the location map. Label all section corners as redlined on the cover sheet. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage. 5. COMMENT: Include in zoning note 6, the gross square footage of the site as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 6. COMMENT: Zoning note 8 must be revised to state the information as noted for the permitted uses based on the PAD document. Revise zoning note 8 as required, see page 55 of the PAD 15 document for additional info. (The Specific use standards listed in the note do not apply) 2-06.4.7.A.7 - If the property is part of a subdivision plat that is being reviewed or has been recorded, provide the case number in the lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note, indicate whether the project is part of a Flexible Lot Development (FLD), condominium, or another similar type project. 7. COMMENT: Reference the subdivision case number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.7.B - Drainage Notes 2-06.4.7.C.2 - List the following note on all development package documents: "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual." 8. COMMENT: Replace note 19 on the cover sheet with the standard note as noted above. 2-06.4.7.F - Trails Notes List the following notes as appropriate. 2-06.4.7.F.1 - If a trail or path is proposed, provide a note, as appropriate, indicating that a trail or path will be constructed for public or private use, the general location of the trail or path, and whom it will be constructed and maintained by. If it is intended to connect to an offsite feature, such as an exiting trail, wash, sidewalk, road, commercial or residential development, etc., so indicate. If the trail or path is to be dedicated, indicate the method of dedication. 9. COMMENT: Annotate the existing trail along the west side of the subject site, reference the PDSD GIS map for location. It is integrated in the paved path along the eastside of the Park Avenue pedestrian area. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 10. COMMENT: Show the existing conditions or what will be the conditions 50 feet from the south property line of the subject site. Reference DP15-0103 for design information. 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. 11. COMMENT: On sheet two, relocate the two curve data text blocks along the SE boundary to the right side of the property line to make the data legible. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 12. COMMENT: Per the current plat, there is an existing right of way easement dkt 2449 at pg 122 over the south and west portion of lot 2 that may impact the proposed development. It is not known if this easement has been vacated or abandoned. Draw and label this easement on the site sheets. If the easement has been vacated or abandoned provide documentation with the next submittal. If the easement has to be vacated or abandoned, it must be completed prior to final approval of the DP. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 13. COMMENT: Provide on the site sheets, the information as noted by the standard above for Park Avenue. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. 14. COMMENT: Label the zoning classifications of the adjoining parcels including the zoning across the street to the west. The zoning should all be PAD 15. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 15. COMMENT: Draw on the site sheets, wheel stops at all parking spaces that abut the sidewalk. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route. Provide as a note the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, whether the loading space is a Type A or B as provided in UDC Section 7.5.4. 16. COMMENT: The proposed location of the loading zone is over the pedestrian circulation path. The loading zone must be relocated or the pedestrian path must be relocated. Per the PAD Section C.2.2.5 a loading zone is required for businesses 2,500 square feet or greater. Review the off-street loading requirements section on pages 52 and 53 of the Bridges PAD for optional locations. (A loading area may be co-located within the approach area for dumpster containers and the stacking spaces of drive-through aisles when safety and access issues are appropriately addressed and delivery and solid waste collection schedules are coordinated so as not to conflict with one another, UDC Section 7.5.4.A.3) 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 17. COMMENT: The minimum number of short and long term bicycle parking shall be two of each type of facilities. Two long term bicycle parking facilities must be provided. Draw, label and dimension the location of the long term facilities. Include a fully dimensioned detail drawing of the long term facility on sheet five. Revise the bicycle parking calculations as required. Review the DP16-0032 DP bicycle parking calculations text block on sheet two. The note under the bicycle parking text block shall be used on sheet two of this DP. 2-06.4.9.K - Identify and provide dimensions, approximate areas in square footage, and purposes of any lots proposed for dedication (such as open spaces, recreation areas, or natural areas) or for reservation for a public use (such as public parks, water facilities, or school sites). 18. COMMENT: For clarification, what is proposed for the northern portion of lot two? 2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan 2-06.4.9.M.1 - A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan. 2-06.4.9.M.2 - Concurrent Review. For all projects, grading plans may be included in the development package and will be reviewed concurrently. 19. COMMENT: The grading plan is being reviewed concurrently. Once zoning approves the DP site plan the Grading plan will also be approved by zoning as it relates to the zoning review purview. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 20. COMMENT: As noted in comment 17, the continuous pedestrian circulation path has been placed within the loading zone area. Also, the pedestrian path may not cross within the drive-thru lane. In order to verify that the pedestrian path is not in the drive-thru or stacking area, the beginning of the stacking area shall be delineated on the plan with a line and a note. See redlines on sheet three 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 21. COMMENT: The pedestrian circulation must connect to the pedestrian sidewalk across the street. Demonstrate on the site plan sheet how this will be accomplished. (A temporary connection may have been required for the Buffet restaurant and may be utilized for the connection or the connection will have to be provided to provide the connection. Review DP15-0103 for possible information on the pedestrian connectivity. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 22. COMMENT: If applicable indicate on the site sheets the location of any proposed freestanding monument signs besides the menu boards or directional signs. 2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. 23. COMMENT: See the landscape reviewer comments related to the landscape border and screening requirements. 24. Ensure that all changes are made to all site, landscape and grading site sheets. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 07/13/2016 | AHINES2 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 07/13/2016 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | Planning Comments 7-13-16 John Beall 1. Please provide letter of recommendation from the Bridges PAD Design Review Committee for the project. Per PAD C.6. |
| 07/13/2016 | AHINES2 | UTILITIES | CENTURYLINK | Passed | |
| 07/13/2016 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 07/13/2016 | AHINES2 | UTILITIES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Passed | |
| 07/13/2016 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 07/14/2016 | DAVID RIVERA | HC SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Label on the site sheet and detail sheet the Cross and Horizontal slopes at all for accessible pedestrian paths and HC parking spaces.. |
| 07/18/2016 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed ot approve these plans |
| 07/18/2016 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | The Facilities Map is in PRO in the document folder. 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 July 21, 2016 Star Consulting of Arizona, Inc Attn: Erin Harris 33 S Fifth Ave Tucson, AZ 85701 erin@starconsultingaz.com To Whom It May Concern: SUBJECT: POPEYES LOUISIANA KITCHEN 1058 E TUCSON MARKETPLACE BLVD DP16-0094 WO #6125559 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted to our office. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer, Jennifer Necas, at (520) 918-8295. Sincerely, Natalie R Nava Scheduling Coordinator Design/Build |
| 07/18/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 07/18/2016 | AHINES2 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approv-Cond | See the Declaration of Avigation Easement in Associated Documents. June 16, 2016 Dear Ms. Hines, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP16-0094, Popeye's / 1st Submittal; a development plan review application for an approximately 2.795 acre site located on the southeast corner of Park Ave and East Tucson Marketplace Blvd. The proposed land use is food service - restaurant. This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The applicant shall file Form 7460 with the FAA. Any cranes used for the project must also be identified with Form 7460. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp. The Tucson Airport Authority conditionally approves the subject request contingent upon the following condition of approval, as noted below. This condition should be identified in the general notes of the approved development plan. Condition of approval: "That prior to the City's approval of any construction permit for a permanent building, the property owner shall record the Avigation Easement prior to the subdivision process which discloses the existence, and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided." "That development shall not cause or potentially affect aviation in the vicinity of the site, including but not limited to, physical obstructions to aircraft operations, interference with operations by way of electrical static, visual obstructions through emissions or glare, and/or the open storage of petroleum products, explosive materials, or materials which attract or lead to the concentration of wildlife." The property owner shall forward a copy of the recorded Avigation Easement to: Scott Robidoux Airport Planner Tucson Airport Authority 7250 South Tucson Boulevard Suite 300 Tucson, AZ 85756 Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, Airport Planner cc MS file |