Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - DP16-0076
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/18/2016 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: May 19, 2016 DUE DATE: June 3, 2016 SUBJECT: Grading New SFR TO: Peter Livingston LOCATION: 3324 W Big Dipper Dr REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM ACTIVITY: DP16-0076 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. The following items need to be addressed: 1) Per AM 2-06.4.3 please add the case number (DP16-0076). 2) Per AM 2-06.4.7A6c include a note stating that the project is designed to comply with Technical Manual Section 4-02, Floodplain, WASH, and ERZ Standard. Include a total for the regulated area and the protected Riparian Area. 3) Per AM 2-06.4.7A8 include the floor area of each building, the percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage. 4) Per AM 2-06.4.7B1 list the following note on the plans; "The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall." 5) Per AM 2-06.4.7B3 list the following note on the plans; "Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this site plan." 6) Per AM 2-06.4.7D include the following note; "Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public." 7) General Note B6 from the tentative plat indicates this lot 51 is subject to WASH ordinance compliance. Comply with AM 2-06.4.7A6C by adding note confirming compliance with TSM 4-02. 8) Per TSM 4-02.2.5A2 show the limits of the WASH linework from the tentative plat. If there is no or disturbance within these limits, no further action is required. If there is disturbance within these limits then compliance with TSM 4-02.2.5B will need to be shown via an ERR report. The approximate limits of this line work has been redlined in on the plans. More fine tuning by referring directly to the tentative plat may produce less restrictive limits 9) Per AM 2-06.4.8C provide as part of the site plan where the driveway ties into the street and what the street width is as well as the location of any sidewalks., curbs, curb cuts and paving. 10) Per AM 2-06.4.8D provide the location, size and type of all utilities adjacent to the site. 11) Per AM 2-06.4.8I please show the floodplain limits from the Plat on the site plan. 12) Per AM 2-06.4.9M and AM 2-06.4.9N4 please show existing and proposed spot grades adjacent to the building footprint and show how proposed grades will tie into existing grades. 13) Per AM 2-06.4.9N show how drainage will be directed around the proposed area of disturbance. Use flow arrows. Please also show how runoff from the driveway will be routed around the habitable portion of the structure. This may best be done by showing a FFE elevation and spot grades up gradient of the structure at the driveway tie in point with the garage. If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 05/19/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: DP16-0076 & T16CM03352 2215 E. Monte Vista Drive Residential (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 19, 2016 The grading and building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 1. Provide the recordation information for the 10' Public Utility Easement shown on the plan. 2. The perimeter yard setbacks shown on the plan are not correct. Per UDC Table 6.4.5.C-1 ADT over 140 but less than 1,000 the street perimeter yard is 21' or the height of the exterior building wall measured to the nearest edge of travel lane. Per UDC Section 8.7.3.L.1 interior lots the required perimeter yard is 3'-0". Either correct the perimeter yard setback lines or provide the actual setback dimensions. 3. Until the grading plan is approved by all other PDSD review agencies Zoning cannot approve the grading plan. Until the grading plan is approved Zoning cannot approve the building plan. Once the above comments are addressed Zoning will provide an over-the-counter review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 05/20/2016 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Reqs Change | UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE 5.2. HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT ZONE (HDZ) Add the following notes to the site plan: Vegetation Retention and Revegetation a. Vegetation Retention (1) Existing viable and transplantable trees with four inch or greater trunk diameter and cacti shall be preserved in their original locations, except for building sites and access and utilities serving building sites. (2) When retention of the above trees and cacti in their original locations is not possible due to building site location, the trees and cacti shall be salvaged and replanted in areas requiring revegetation, whenever possible. b. Revegetation All cut or fill slopes that are no steeper than three horizontal to one vertical and all utility trenches or septic leaching fields that are not located in parking or driveway areas shall be revegetated in compliance with the following standards: (1) All plants used in revegetation shall be the same as the native vegetation on the site prior to grading or clearing or any adjacent site; and, (2) Revegetation shall be accomplished with the following minimum standards for plants: (a) Desert trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size with a minimum trunk diameter of two inches measured at the soil level, or large specimen cactus shall be placed at the same vegetation density found on the site prior to any clearing, grubbing, or grading; and, (b) Seeds for trees, desert shrubs, and grasses shall be planted with a density adequate to control erosion and may use one of the following methods of planting: Raked into the soil with appropriate mulch materials; hydroseeding; anchored mulches; or established on jute, rolled straw, or similar material. Another method may be approved by PDSD. (3) A temporary watering system shall be installed until the revegetation materials are established. 3. Slope Stabilization All slopes steeper than a ratio of three horizontal to one vertical, with the exception of retaining walls, shall be stabilized with properly engineered stone riprapping or sculptured rock as follows: a. Stone riprapping shall be hand-placed on the slope; b. The stabilizing material used shall blend with the natural appearance of the site or lot and the surrounding terrain; and, c. Vegetation retention and revegetation should be used in conjunction with riprapping. C. Color All exposed exterior walls and roofs of structures, retaining walls, and accessory structures, except satellite dishes, shall be earth tone in color and shall blend with the predominant natural colors found on the lot or parcel. Satellite dishes may be black. White is not permitted. Ensure that all Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/13/2016 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |