Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - TENT PLAT & CORE RESUB
Permit Number - DP16-0044
Review Name: REVISION - TENT PLAT & CORE RESUB
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/30/2017 | ARUIZ1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/02/2017 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Principal Planner PROJECT: Irvington & I-19 Commercial Center Development Package (Revision #3) DP16-0044 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 6, 2017 DUE DATE: June 27, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). 1. 2-06.4.9.B - Sheets 4 - 9 the square footage of the proposed lot is rounded to the hundreds whereas the lot square footages shown on the "LOT PERMITTING STATUS TABLE" are rounded to the tenths, clarify the difference. 2. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Sheet 16 Buildings #21, #22 & #23 show the required 1' setback to the drive-through on the plan, see UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.a.(2). 3. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Building 16 accessible parking detail sheet, 84 and Building 17, 27 & 28 accessible parking detail sheet 85 clearly demonstrate that the accessible vehicle parking spaces sign does not encroach into the 2'-6" vehicle overhang. 4. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Building 30 accessible parking detail sheet 85, clearly demonstrate that the accessible vehicle parking spaces sign does not encroach into the adjacent vehicle parking space. 5. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Sheet 17 Building #31 short term bicycle parking shows one (1) rack but "BUILDING 31" detail appears to show two (2) racks 6. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Sheet 18 southeast corner of Building #17 Keynote 25 calls for long term bicycle parking but there are none shown on the plan 7. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Sheet 80 Building 22 detail provide the 2.5' dimension between the rack and building, both directions. 8. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Sheet 80 Building 34 detail the "5'" dimension does not align with the short term space. 9. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Sheet 81 Building 39 detail provide the 2.5' dimension between the rack and building. 10. 2-06.4.9.Q - Sheet 11 Northeast corner of Building #1 there is a "WALL/FENCE/COLUMN" called out 11. 2-06.4.9.Q - Sheet 14 Building #13 shows "AREA = 6,137 (INCL. 1,500 SF TOTAL PATIO), there are two (2) patios shown, one (1) 300 SF and one (1) 1,500 SF for a total of 1,800 SF. Clarify which is correct. Also for consistency list the square footage for the building and patio as shown on sheet 12 for Building #5. 12. 2-06.4.9.R - Sheet 14 & 34 it appears that you are proposing a step into the building. 13. 2-06.4.9.R - On sheet 14 or on Building 13 accessible parking detail sheet 84 provide a sidewalk width dimension for the sidewalk shown along the northeast side of the proposed ramp. 14. 2-06.4.9.R - On sheet 16 or on Building 23 accessible parking detail sheet 85 provide a sidewalk width dimension between the accessible sign and the building. 15. 2-06.4.9.R - Sheet 16 provide a sidewalk width dimension for the sidewalks and crosswalks that run northwest off the southwest corner of Building #20. 16. 2-06.4.9.R - Sheet 17 area northwest of Building #26 fully dimension all sidewalks in this area as there are numerous changes. Also provide a width dimension from the sidewalk at the bottom of the proposed ramp. This dimension is from the end of the handrail extension west to the edge of sidewalk. 17. 2-06.4.9.R - On sheet 20 there is a "6'" sidewalk dimension shown just north of the southern accessible parking spaces that does not appear to be correct. 18. 2-06.4.9.R - On sheet 23 provide a sidewalk width dimension for the sidewalk north of Building #37. 19. 2-06.4.9.R - Sheet 28 Building #42 remove the ramps that provide access to the loading spaces as this presents an un-safe condition. 20. 2-06.4.9.R - Sheet 29 Building #43 remove the ramps that provide access to the loading spaces as this presents an un-safe condition. 21. Sheet 18 there is a keynote 27 shown near the southwest corner of the page but no keynote 27 shown under "KEYNOTES". 22. Sheet 27 there is a keynote 33 shown near the west end of lot #46 but no keynote 33 shown under "KEYNOTES". 23. Sheet 11 north match line information missing. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 06/06/2017 | SSHIELD1 | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments. |
| 06/16/2017 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 06/19/2017 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 06/20/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Revise the "utility + easements" plans to include the identification numbers and rim elevations of the new private manholes for evaluation of the need for backwater valves. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D, Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012, and Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 06/26/2017 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/26/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Reqs Change | Per the email below from our Designer, TEP is not able to provide comment in the time frame required for the review. He is working directly with the developer to resolve conflicts with lighting and trees within our transmission easement. Thanks, Mary Burke Right of Way Agent III Tucson Electric Power Co. Mail Stop HQE613 PO Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 Office - 520-917-8744 Cell - 520-401-9895 mburke@tep.com |
| 06/26/2017 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/26/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Reqs Change | See Facilities Map under Documents in PRO. 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 June 28, 2017 WR# 6193702 DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov patricia.gehlen@tucsonaz.gov reast@bourncompanies.com jphunt@cypresscivil.com Dear Mr. Hunt SUBJECT: Irvington & I-19 Commercial Development 1050 W Irvington Rd DP16-0044 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and not approved the development plan. It appears there are existingTEP facilities that are in conflict with the proposed development and may need to be relocated. Please make corrections and resubmit for approval. The conflicts. Building 9 is encroaching within an existing TEP easement. The building must be relocated outside the easement and must meet applicable NESC clearances form TEP lines. The development is also indicating that vegetation is proposed to be installed within TEP's existing 70' wide 138KV easement. No trees can be planted underneath the lines; furthermore, no trees that grow taller than 15' at maturity can be planted within the easement. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Rich Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer, Josh Necas @ 917-8759. Sincerely, Beth Shelton Elizabeth "Beth" Shelton Admin Assistant Design |
| 06/27/2017 | KELLY LEE | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 240 N STONE AVENUE Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Julieann Arechederra GIS Cartographer Pima County Assessor's Office DATE: JUNE 27, 2017 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding: IRVINGTON & I-19 COMMERCIAL CENTER DP16-0044 (TENTATIVE PLAT 5th) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 06/28/2017 | KELLY LEE | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | See Redlined Copy of Development Plan under Documents in PRO. DP16-0044 IRVINGTON & I-19 / 1st Submittal of 3rd Revision is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 Description: Description: cid:image001.png@01CE70DF.60625CC0 Click here to search for Projects and Permits or to make a Payment Click here to search for Septic Records |
| 06/30/2017 | KELLY LEE | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
| 06/30/2017 | KELLY LEE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Passed | The revisions did not affect our original Wastewater approval of the Tentative Plat for Irvington & I-19 Respectfully, Tom Thomas W.Porter, P.E. Civil Engineer Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Dept Development Liaison Unit 201 N. Stone Ave., 1st Floor, Tucson, AZ 85701-1207 ph: (520) 724-6719 From: Jeff Hunt [jphunt@cypresscivil.com] Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 2:52 PM To: DSD_CDRC <DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov>; Thomas Porter <Thomas.Porter@pima.gov> Cc: Alan Showalter <Alan.Showalter@pima.gov>; Erica Sanchez <Erica.Sanchez@pima.gov>; Lorenzo Hernandez (RWRD) <Lorenzo.Hernandez@pima.gov> Subject: RE: DP16-0044 IRVINGTON & I-19 / 1st Submittal Sorry for not responding sooner. The changes did not impact Wastewater’s approval and therefore no plans were routed to Wastewater. Regards, Jeff Hunt, PE Principal logo 01.12 - 50% 4450 N 12th Street, Suite 228 Phoenix, Arizona 85014 mobile (623) 341-7892 office (623) 282-2498 www.cypresscivil.com |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/18/2017 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |