Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: DP16-0044
Parcel: 13705494B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: REVISION - TENT PLAT & CORE RESUB

Permit Number - DP16-0044
Review Name: REVISION - TENT PLAT & CORE RESUB
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/31/2016 AHINES2 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
10/31/2016 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
11/01/2016 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approv-Cond DP16-0044 Irvington & I-19 Commercial Center / Revision 1 / 1st Submittal is Approved by Pima County Addressing with the request that King Niles suffix be changed to LP.

Thank you,

Robin Freiman
Addressing Specialist
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-7570
11/17/2016 PAUL BAUGHMAN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: November 18, 2016
DUE DATE: November 29, 2016
SUBJECT: Tentative Plat: Mixed Use Commercial Shopping Center
TO: Jeff Hunt, PE
LOCATION: 1050 W. Irvington Road
REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP16-0044
SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. The following items need to be addressed:
1) Per PAD Document City of Tucson Water Harvesting requirements apply. Please restore the curb cuts and areas of hardscape surfacing being routed to the interior landscaped islands in the same manner as approved in the original DP16-0044. See also October 21, 2016 letter from Jeff Hunt and Phone Conversation on November 18, 2016 between Paul Baughman and Jeff Hunt. See redlines.
2) Add keynote to 21 to list of keynotes on sheet 25 and all other sheets where this keynote is or will be called out based on other comments. See redlines.
3) Relocate or remove the new catch basin and 12" storm drain pipe west of building 38 on sheet 43 (ie. CP 15) and let at least some of the hardscape surfaces drain to required water harvesting area instead. This is per the previously approved plan and agreement on water harvesting for complying with Tucson Commercial Water Harvesting Requirements. See redlines.
4) Update the watershed summary table, the Storm water inlet summary tables and the proposed conditions watershed map from the drainage report for PWS 15, CP 15 and any other PWS or CP as appropriate to account for the change in watershed conditions.
If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov.
11/17/2016 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Principal Planner

PROJECT: Irvington & I-19 Commercial Center
Development Package (Revision #1)
DP16-0044

TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 17, 2016

DUE DATE: November 29, 2016

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

1. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Sheet 12 main access lane north bound dimensions do not line up with the access lanes.

2. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Sheet 14 near Building #13 there appears to be a proposed one-way access lane. Provide a width dimension for this access lane. Also per PAD 29 Section C.3 the minimum width of a one-way access aisle should be 20'-0". Demonstrate on the plan how the one-way access lane will be controlled, i.e. signage, pavement marking, etc.

3. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Sheets 14 & 19 Building #10 show the required 1'-0" setback from the drive-thru to the building, see UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.a.(2).

4. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Sheet 21 top left corner there is an access lane shown. Per UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. Show the required barriers along this access lane.

5. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Sheet 3 the required number of vehicle parking spaces is not correct. Per PAD 29 Section C.1 the required vehicle parking should be based on 1 space per 300 square feet for all permitted use.

6. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - There are numerous wheel stop location dimensions that are not shown correctly with in the drawing set. You may want to provide a standard detail.

7. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Per UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.g A bicycle rack must be a minimum of two and one half feet from a wall or other obstruction. Show that this requirement is met at;
a. Sheet 79, BUILDING 4, between the rack and long term locker.
b. Sheet 79, BUILDING 19, the dimension should be from the south end of the rack not north.
c. Sheet 79, BUILDING 20, the dimension should be from the south end of the rack not north.
d. Sheet 80, BUILDING 33, between the rack and the building.
e. Sheet 80, BUILDING 36, between the rack and the building.
f. Sheet 80, BUILDING 39, between the rack and long term locker.

8. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Sheet 79, Detail L clarify what "BOLT TO LOCKER TO 4" CONCRETE PAD" means.

9. 2-06.4.9.R - Sheet 15 lower left corner show the required pedestrian circulation to the proposed trash enclosure.

10. 2-06.4.9.R - Sheet 12 or 13 Building #7 provide a width dimension for the sidewalk along the main entrances. Per PAD 29 Section C.13.e this should be a minimum 6'-0".

11. 2-06.4.9.R - There are numerous 10' wide speed humps shown on the plans. Demonstrate how vehicles will be prevented from accessing the sidewalk via the speed hump.

12. 2-06.4.9.R - Sheet 19 south of Building #11 there is a 6.5' dimension at the top of the accessible ramp that does not line up with the ramp.

13. 2-06.4.9.R - Keynote 19 calls "SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 82. As sheet 82 only has ramp details for Buildings 1 - 5 should this keynote also reference sheets 83 - 85?

14. 2-06.4.9.R - Sheet 21 east of Building #29 there is a 14' dimension that dimensions nothing, clarify.

15. 2-06.4.9.R - There are numerous accessible vehicle parking spaces shown that provides access to the buildings via a speed hump. Based on the minimal grades provided it is not clear that the access will work.

16. 2-06.4.9.R - Sheet 37 there are accessible vehicle parking spaces shown just east of building #28. It appears that a curb ramp is proposed here, clearly shown the ramp.

17. 2-06.4.9.R - Where accessible vehicle parking signs are proposed to be located within a sidewalk where the sidewalk is 6' or less demonstrate on the "ACCESSIBLE PARKING DETAILS" that the minimum 4' sidewalk with is maintained. This applies to Sheet 85 details for Buildings #37 & #41.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
11/17/2016 SSHIELD1 H/C SITE REVIEW Reqs Change See Zoning comments
11/25/2016 AHINES2 COT NON-DSD TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT Approved I have no issues with these plans at this time. Would like to be able to review as the development proceeds reference the lighting plans when that becomes available.

Thank you

CSO Cindy Dunn #39119
Commnity Resource CSO
Tucson Police Dept/ODS
4410 S. Park Ave
Tucson, AZ 85714
520-837-2860
Cynthia.Dunn@tucsonaz.gov
11/28/2016 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. The revised utility plans show two private manholes labeled #21 (See sheets 69 and 71).
2. Lot 12 has a first floor elevation of 2425.00 but the upstream manhole has a rim elevation of 2425.08 which is higher than the first floor elevation. Provide a backwater valve per Section 7715.1, IPC 2012 as amended by the City of Tucson.
11/29/2016 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approved
11/29/2016 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Reqs Change Having difficulty determining distance between hydrants. Please provide one sheet of the entire site clearly showing hydrant locations.
11/29/2016 MMORENO1 COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied Applicant must provide a letter from the Architectural Review Committee ("ARC") Subsequent to PAD approval and at the time Declarations are recorded for the Property, the Property owner shall establish an Architectural Review Committee ("ARC") to review and approve architectural design within the Property for compliance with the Development Standards in Section 3 of this PAD and any additional design criteria for the Property. Materials used in the building and Property features will be compatible with the desert environment, complement existing development in the area, and contain architectural details that provide interest and character to the development. The design guidelines will be approved by the ARC. The ARC shall review all proposed architectural plans. Through a self-certification process, the ARC will provide a letter of approval to the City at time of development package submittal.
11/30/2016 AHINES2 ENV SVCS REVIEW Approved The City of Tucson - Environmental and General Services Department has completed our review of the latest submittal for DP16-0044, Irvington & I-19 Commercial Center. Previously submitted comments regarding the size, number and location of refuse and recycling containers have been appropriately addressed on the plan. It is understood that design details regarding solid waste compactors will be addressed in the future as plans are developed for these facilities.

Based on this review, the City of Tucson - Environmental and General Services Department approves the DP16-0044 from a solid waste standpoint. Please contact me if there are any questions concerning this review.

Tom Ryan, P.E.
City of Tucson - Environmental and General Services Department
11/30/2016 AHINES2 UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Reqs Change Tucson Electric Power Co., (TEP) has reviewed the Tentative Plat submitted on 10/31/16 and has the following comment:

It does not appear that this plat is a resubdivision of Calle Santa Cruz Blocks 1-3 (Sequence No 20143530542), as Calle Santa Cruz Blocks 1-3 are south of Irvington Rd. Please identify the plat as a resubdivision of a portion of Parque de Santa Cruz, Book 29, Page 48. Also, the project is located in the S.W. ¼ of Section 35, not the S.E. ¼.

If you have any questions, please contact me at 520-917-8744.

Thank you,

Mary Burke
Right of Way Agent II
Tucson Electric Power Co.
Mail Stop HQE613
PO Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702
Office - 520-917-8744
Cell - 520-401-9895
mburke@tep.com
11/30/2016 AHINES2 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items:

1) Two rolled sets of the plans
2) All approved documents submitted previously
3) A disk containing all items submitted
4) All items requested by review staff
5) All items needed to approve these plans
11/30/2016 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Approved Office of the Pima County Assessor
240 N STONE AVENUE
Tucson, Arizona 85701

BILL STAPLES
ASSESSOR

TO: CDRC Office
Subdivision Review
City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559)

FROM: Julieann Arechederra
GIS Cartographer
Pima County Assessor's Office

DATE: November 30, 2016

RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding:

IRVINGTON & I-19 COMMERCIAL CENTER DP16-0044
(TENTATIVE PLAT 4)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
X Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements.
_______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements.

COMMENTS:

See notes on final plat.

NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/26/2017 LBOJORQ1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed