Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP16-0032
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/23/2016 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Approved | |
| 02/24/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | See letter in PRO/SIRE |
| 02/29/2016 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | The proposed development will have no affect to any adjacent ADOT facilities and Regional Traffic Engineering supports the development’s acceptance. No comments for this submittal. Thank you. |
| 02/29/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Approved | |
| 02/29/2016 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Reqs Change | Office of the Pima County Assessor 240 N STONE AVENUE Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Janice Wagner GIS Cartographer Pima County Assessor's Office DATE: February 25, 2016 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding: DP16-0032/TUCSON MARKET PLACE PHASE 5 TENTATIVE PLAT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. ___X____ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: " THE LOCATION MAP MUST BE IN THE UPPER RIGHT HAND CORNER AND MUST HAVE THE NEW SUBDIVISION (PROJECT AREA) OUTLINED OR HAVE AN ARROW POINT TO IT. " ALL LOTS MUST HAVE SQUARE FOOTAGE. IF THE AREA IS TOO SMALL, THEY CAN HAVE A TABLE TO THE SIDE FOR THE SQUARE FOOTAGE NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 02/29/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | See comments in PRO/SIRE. DP16-0032/Tucson Market Place Phase 5 Tentative Plat/1st Review is being returned for corrections, please see sticky notes. Thank you, Mary Wright Pima County Development Services Building and Site Development 201 N Stone Av, 1st Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701 (520) 724-6490 www.pima.gov/developmentservices |
| 03/01/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | March 1, 2016 To: Jamsheed Behrana, P.E Optimus Civil Design Group ____________________________________ From: Erica Sanchez, CEA, PCRWRD (520) 724-6934 Subject: Planet Fitness Tucson Market Place Phase 5 P16WS00020 (DP16-0032) PSL- 1st Submittal The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer design for the above-referenced project. The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby approves the above referenced submittal of the Preliminary Sewer Layout (PSL), based upon PCRWRD Engineering Design Standards (EDS). If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact me at your convenience. Cc. Lorenzo Hernandez, P.E., RWRD Francisco Galindo, P.E., RWRD |
| 03/02/2016 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: March 3, 2016 DUE DATE: March 22, 2016 SUBJECT: Planet Fitness, Site Grading, SWPPP TO: Jamsheed D. Behrana, PE LOCATION: 1500 E Tucson Marketplace Blvd REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM ACTIVITY: DP16-0032 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. The following items need to be addressed: 1) Per TSM 10-01.3.2B1 curbing shall be vertical or wedge curb. Please update construction note 4 on sheet SP-1 (Sheet 6) accordingly. Please clarify in construction note if this is temporary extruded curb to be removed during development of specific subsequent lots. 2) Per UDC 7.4.6E1a minimum unobstructed radius of five feet is required for all PAAL intersections, except as follows. A minimum unobstructed radius of 18 feet is required where an access lane or PAAL designated as a fire lane or is used to access refuse and/or recycling collection or loading zones intersects another access lane or PAAL. 3) Per AM 2-06.4.9H1 please update and add curb radius callouts on sheet SP-1 (Sheet 6) accordingly to show compliance. 4) Per AM 2-06.4.9H3 Please show fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability. 5) Please update Grading and Drainage note 6 on sheet G-1 (Sheet 7) to reflect the geotechnical report submitted with this development package (ie. Pattison Engineering, LLC Project Number 16-003, Dated January 28, 2016. 6) Construction note 25 refers the reviewer to the architectural drawings for the proposed hardscape. All hardscape details outside of the building walls need to be shown on the development plan. Please include the details regarding how roof drainage is being conveyed beneath the pedestrian way per TSM 7-01.4.3E. Calling out a Type 1 sidewalk scupper per Pima County/ City of Tucson Standard Detail 204 via a keynote is usually sufficient. A larger capacity type 2 scupper via detail 205 may be used if needed. 7) It is not clear how detail 3 on sheet DTL-1 (Sheet 9) will allow surface drainage flowing towards the type 3 catch basin as called out by construction note 22 on sheet G-2 (Sheet 8) to flow past the vertical curb as called out by construction note 1 and into the type 3 catch basin. Per AM2-06.4.9N2 please clarify with a curb cut or other grading detail how positive drainage to storm drain system is maintained. Please note that detail 10/DTL-2 (sheet 10) only shows the 1 foot curb openings on the ends of the water harvesting islands with a callout for placement at the upstream ends. 8) Per Section 10.9.1, item 15 of the City of Tucson Drainage Standards Manual it is recommended that the roughness coefficients used for storm drains for final design be for "aged" conditions, and be approximately fifteen percent greater than those coefficients ordinarily used for new conduits. Please show assumptions used for the Manning's n values for storm drainage calculations and provide narrative as to how aged conditions were addressed. 9) Per Section 10.9.1, item 16 of the City of Tucson Drainage Standards Manual a drop of 0.1 foot shall be provided at a through manhole, and a drop of 0.3 feet at a manhole intersection with two laterals. If a conduit changes direction in a manhole without changing size, a drop of 0.4 feet shall be provided. Please update the plans and drainage report accordingly. 10) Per Section 10.9.1, item 19 of the City of Tucson Drainage Standards Manual storm drain crossings with other utilities shall be avoided, if at all possible. Crossings, if absolutely necessary, shall be at angles greater than forty-five degrees. Please show the minimum crossing angles for the Storm drain and water line crossings located at the northwest corner of lot 9 on sheet G-2 (Sheet 8). 11) Per Section 4 (page 13) of the SWPPP storm water pollutant control measures installed during construction, that will also provide storm water management benefits after construction, include landscape/vegetation stabilized areas. There are several depressed landscape areas called out on the plans that could silt in and provide reduced infiltration benefits if not protected by SWPPP measures during construction. Please provide general notes or details to ensure these areas are protected from siltation and clogging of soil pores during the construction process in accordance with requirements from the SWPPP section 4. This could include mention of these depressed landscape areas in the Site Erosion Control Plan included on sheet SWMP-1 (sheet 12) of the plans. 12) Per AM 2-06.4.3 please show the DP16-0032 number as part of the title block area. 13) Per AM 2-06.4.4CB please identify Ajo Way on the project location map as part of the map in the upper right hand corner of the front page. 14) Per AM2-06.4.8I and Per AM2-06.4.9N6 show 100 year locally regulated floodplain limits and the 100 year water surface elevation of the adjacent drainage basin. Please provide a floodplain use permit application with the next submittal if there are improvements being placed in the floodplain limits. Please show the line work for these floodplain limits in the legend on the first sheet. 15) Per AM2-06.4.9H2 please show future and existing sight visibility triangles. 16) Per AM2-06.4.9H4 please show dimensioning between Sidewalks, curbs, street and any utility locations. 17) Per AM2-06.4.9L please show the water and sewer line easements as applicable. 18) Per AM 2-06.4.9T show vehicle maneuverability for refuse collection per TSM Section 8-01.5.3C. 19) Per TSM 2-01.4.1C6 and the Geotechnical report page 12 in areas where sidewalks or paving do not immediately adjoin the structures, protective slopes should be provided with an outfall of at least 3 percent for at least 5 feet from the perimeter walls. If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 03/15/2016 | ARUIZ1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | DOCUMENTS IN PRO/SIRE No objections/adverse comments. See attached. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclaimer: This report and/or data was funded in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration and/or Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. The contents of this report and/or data reflect the views and opinions of the author(s) who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily state or reflect the official views or policies of the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Arizona Department of Transportation, or any other State or Federal Agency. This report and/or data does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. The information in this publication is provided on an “as is” basis, and there are no warranties, express or implied, including, but not limited to, any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall PAG be liable for any damages resulting from the use of the information. PAG provides the information in good faith and has endeavored to create and maintain accurate data. The users of this report and/or data are advised to use the information with caution and to independently verify accuracy. ____________________________ Eric W. Kramer, Ph.D., AICP Senior Land-Use Modeler 1 E. Broadway Blvd, Ste. 401 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 495-1455 (tel) (520) 620-6981 (fax) www.pagregion.com ekramer@pagregion.com |
| 03/15/2016 | ARUIZ1 | POLICE | REVIEW | Approved | I have no issues with this Tentative Plat review. Kara Curtis Community Service Officer Tucson Police Department Operations Division Midtown 1100 S. Alvernon Tucson, AZ 85711 kara.curtis@tucsonaz.gov (520) 837-7428 |
| 03/17/2016 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 03/17/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Planet Fitness - Tucson Market Place Development Package (1st Review) DP16-0032 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 18, 2016 DUE DATE: March 22, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is February 21, 2016. 1. 2-06.3.9 - The plan drawing shall be oriented with north toward the top of the sheet. If it is not practical to orient north to the top of the sheet, the plan drawing shall be oriented with north to the left side of the sheet. 2. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP16-0032, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 3. 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Sheet DP-2 clarify why there is a 3,598 square foot difference in the square footage listed on sheet DP-2 DP15-0138 for the theater & anchor 3. 4. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Provide an access lane width dimension for the access lane along the north side of the building between the electrical service called out under construction note (CN) 9 and the curb. 5. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Provide an access lane width dimension for the access lane along the north side of the building between the loading space called out under CN 24 and the curb. 6. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Per UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.b Access lanes and PAALs must be setback at least two feet from a wall, screen, or other obstruction over six inches. That said provide a setback dimensions between the access lane along the south of the building and the light poles called out under CN 20. 7. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Per UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.b Access lanes and PAALs must be setback at least two feet from a wall, screen, or other obstruction over six inches. That said provide a setback dimensions between the access lane along the south of the building and the bollards called out under CN 22. 8. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Provide and access lane for the southern most accessible vehicle parking space. 9. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Sheet DP-2 the loading space calculation is not correct. Per UDC Table 7.5.5-A no loading space is required for a commercial recreation use. 10. 2-06.4.9.R - Per TSM 7-01.4.1.B A sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to any access lane or PAAL on the side where buildings are located. That said provide a sidewalk along the north and east side of the building. 2-06.4.9.W - If applicable show any proposed signs on the plan. All signs require a separate permit. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 03/17/2016 | ARUIZ1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Reqs Change | The City of Tucson - Environmental Services Department (ES) has completed our initial review of the Development Package Application materials for the proposed Planet Fitness building development at the Tucson Market Place. The address of the proposed development is 1500 E. Tucson Marketplace Boulevard in Tucson. The proposed Planet Fitness building site is currently vacant. On Drawing DP-2, the waste generation rate for this development was correctly stated as 0.0057 tons per square foot of floor space per year. This is the generation rate for a food retail, multi-family or large commercial development. However, in the calculation of the number of cubic yards of waste generated per week, a waste generation rate of 0.0013 tons per square foot of floor space was used. These calculations should be redone using the 0.0057 tons per square foot per year generation rate. The use of Automated Plastic Containers (APCs) for recycling materials will not be approved for this facility. A metal container(s) for recycling materials shall be proposed for this site. The waste enclosure shall be modified to reflect the appropriate number of refuse and recycling containers based on the recalculation of the annual waste generation. What are the plans for refuse and recycling material storage for Lot 9? It appears that Lot 9 is within the Planned Area Development for the Planet Fitness facility. Calculations for waste generation for Lot 9 shall be included in this application or justification for alternate waste management practices for this parcel shall be provided. You may want to consider constructing one enclosure for either refuse or recycling materials near Lot 9 and have the second enclosure at the southeast corner of the proposed Planet Fitness building as shown on Drawing DP-2, if there are space concerns with one larger enclosure. In summary, ES is requiring the above-described revisions to the Development Package from a solid waste standpoint for the proposed Planet Fitness building development at the Tucson Market Place. Please contact me if there are any questions concerning this review. Thomas G. Ryan, P.E. City of Tucson - Environmental Services Department |
| 03/18/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 03/18/2016 | SSHIELD1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/18/2016 | SSHIELD1 | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments |
| 03/18/2016 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Reqs Change | PAD-15, The Bridges, requires in C: PAD Proposals, under C.6 Design Review Committee and Design Guidelines States the following: Prior to the submittal of any Development Plan or subdivision plat to the City of Tucson, the Developer must procure a letter of recommendation from the DRC for submittal to the City. This letter, and a record copy (for the City's archives) of the materials recommended by the DRC, must accompany any City submittal in order to allow review of same by Development Services Department. |
| 03/18/2016 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/21/2016 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 03/21/2016 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Reqs Change | The PAD (pg 73 - Trail Connection Plan) indicates that there is to be a bicycle connection to the El Paso SW Greenway multi-use path at approximately the northwest corner of this parcel. Please add this connection to the plan. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/22/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 03/22/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Passed | |
| 03/22/2016 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/22/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | CENTURYLINK | Passed | |
| 03/22/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 03/25/2016 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | See letter and form PRO/SIRE. 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 January 25, 2016 Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson Patricia.gehlen@tucsonaz.gov Dear Ms. Gehlen: SUBJECT: PLANET FITNESS, TUCSON MARKETPLACE WO Number 6111350 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted March 8, 2016. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. TEP has coordinated the relocation of the existing equipment with the developer. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918- 8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Rich Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (OH-204) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Jennifer Necas at (520) 918-8295. Sincerely, Sharon Williams Sharon Williams Scheduling Coordinator Design |
| 03/25/2016 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve the plans |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/20/2016 | ARUIZ1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |