Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP16-0030
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/23/2016 | KROBLES1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/24/2016 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | The above project has been “approved” by Pima County Addressing on 02/24/16. (Please label project #DP16-0030 on all Sheets.) |
| 02/29/2016 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | The proposed development will not have any impacts to ADOT facilities due to its proposed location. Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments and supports its acceptance. Thank you. |
| 02/29/2016 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Reqs Change | February 29, 2016 To: Kevin Perko Dibble Engineering ____________________________________ From: Erica Sanchez, CEA, PCRWRD (520) 724-6934 Subject: Banner UMC North Campus P16WS00015 PSL- 1st Submittal The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer design for the above-referenced project. The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department has found the following deficiencies in the above referenced submittal of the Preliminary Sewer Layout (PSL), based upon PCRWRD Engineering Design Standards (EDS) 2012. 1. Sheet C3.1 & C3.7: Call out the construction plan number for the existing sewer line and the IMS numbers for all of the existing public manholes/cleanouts shown on plan with as-built rim and invert elevations. 2. Sheet C3.1: Call out the public sewer easement with width and recordation information for the public sewer shown along the north side of property. 3. Sheet C3.7: Call out for depressed curb and extra strength concrete for the sidewalk on the south side of Allen Road fronting MH # 8824-01 per EDS 2012 7.6. This office will require a revised set of plans, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. All comments cited in this letter are based upon PCRWRD Engineering Design Standards 2012 and PCRWRD Standard Specifications and Details for Construction 2012. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the Preliminary Sewer Layout. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per Sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50.00 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next plan submittal will require a review fee of $100.00 made payable to Pima County Treasurer. If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact me at your convenience. Cc. Lorenzo Hernandez, P.E., RWRD Francisco Galindo, P.E., RWRD |
| 03/08/2016 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | |
| 03/08/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. An approved development plan is not to be used for construction or modification of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to buildings, building sewers, site lighting, electrical service to buildings, etc.). The construction of the on-site utilities for the building shall be included with the permit for constructing the building. A separate permit is required for the installation of a private sewer collection system (i.e. a private sewer connecting multiple buildings and/or having manholes). Reference: Title 18, R18-9-E302, 4.02 General Permit, Arizona Administrative Code. 2. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (MH #2, 2362.59') is less than 12" below the first floor elevation (2363.50'). Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve for the building sewer located downstream of MH #2when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 03/11/2016 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/15/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Banner University Medical Center - Tucson North Development Package (1st Review) DP16-0030 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 16, 2016 DUE DATE: March 17, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is February 17, 2016. 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.4 - A title block shall be provided in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. This includes the cover sheet. 2. 2-06.3.7 - A small, project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet. 3. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP16-0030, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 4. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the administrative street address adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 5. 2-06.4.4 - Provide a project-location map on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner. The location map shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information; 2-06.4.2.A - Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area; 2-06.4.2.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and, 2-06.4.2.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 6. 2-06.4.5 - Clarify why there are two (2) cover sheets, sheet 1 & 4, and duplication of information. 7. 2-06.4.6 - Provide a reduced-scale map of the PAD on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed. 8. 2-06.4.7.A.1 - List as a general note: "Existing zoning is PAD-11." 9. 2-06.4.7.A.2 - As a general note List as a general note the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage. 10. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - As a general note identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 11. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List the following applicable case numbers, C9-04-23, D06-0007 & D05-0035, in lower right corner adjacent to the title block of each sheet. 12. 2-06.4.8.B - There are numerous easements shown on development packages D05-0035 & D06-0007, that are not shown on this package. So all existing easements along with the recordation information on the plan. 13. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 14. 2-06.4.9.E - A lot combination is required for the two (2) southern parcels. Zoning acknowledges that a filled out Pima County Combo Request for was provided with this submittal but it does not show that the Pima County Assessors reviewed and approved the lot combo. 15. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. Zoning recommends that this information be provided on the required reduced PAD map, see comment 7. 16. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show any applicable future and existing sight visibility triangles (SVTs) on the plan. 17. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Sheet C3.4 provide access lane width dimensions for access lane/drop-off at both the east and west end. 18. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Per UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.b Access lanes and PAALs must be setback at least two feet from a wall, screen, or other obstruction over six inches. That said Sheet C3.2 & C3.3 construction note (CN) 4 calls for barricade railing to be installed along the north side of the access lane. Show the required two (2) setback on the plan. 19. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Sheet C3.6 provide an access width dimension for the northern most access lane into the parking structure. 20. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Provide a fully dimensioned parking structure so that the requirements of this section can be verified. 21. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - The total number of accessible vehicle parking spaces provided does not appear to be correct. It appears that there are 48 provided on site not 43. 22. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Provide the number of required accessible vehicle parking spaces within the calculation. 23. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Provide a note on detail 5.1 sheet C6.1 stating that all accessible route slopes are to comply with ICC A117.1, Section 403.3; 5% maximum running slopes and 2% maximum cross slopes. 24. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Provide a large scale accessible vehicle parking space sign detail including a van accessible sign. 25. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Provide a fully dimensioned parking structure so that the requirements of this section can be verified. 26. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Provide a short term bicycle parking calculation on the plan. The calculation should include the number required and provided. 27. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show the required short term bicycle parking on the plan. 28. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Provide a detail for the required short term bicycle parking that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B & .C are met. 29. 2-06.4.9.I - Sheet C3.4 it appears that dedication of right-of-way is proposed along the north side of Allen Road. Provide documentation from COT Real Estate once the dedication is approved. 30. 2-06.4.9.O - Provide perimeter yard setback dimensions from the proposed building to the south street property line and from the proposed parking structure to the north property line. Until the height of the proposed structures is provided, see comment 31, the required setback cannot be verified. 31. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each structure within the footprint of the building(s). 32. 2-06.4.9.R - Per IBC 1104.1 demonstrate on the plan that there is an accessible route between all structures, to all accessible vehicle parking spaces, to at least one of the right-of-ways, etc. that meets the requirements of IBC Chapter 11 and the ICC A117.1-2009. 33. 2-06.4.9.R - Per TSM 7-01.4.1.F Sidewalks or pedestrian refuge areas cannot be located between any motor vehicle parking space and the PAAL providing access to that space. That said demonstrate on the plan how a disabled person will get from the accessible vehicle parking spaces shown in the parking structure and south of Allen Road to an accessible route without maneuvering behind a vehicle parking space within the PAAL. 34. 2-06.4.9.R - Per TSM 7-01.3.3.B Within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation path is required as follows: B. The areas within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas, and all other common use areas. That said clearly demonstrate that the minimum 5' sidewalk is provided to the Ronald McDonald House from the existing and proposed structures on site. 35. 2-06.4.9.R - PAD-11 Section 3.2.2.d.(iii) minimum sidewalks width is 5'-0". Provide width dimensions for the sidewalks shown; Sheet C3.4 northeast corner of the sheet south of the proposed parking structure. Sheet C3.5 northwest corner of the sheet south of the proposed parking structure. Sheet C3.5 sidewalk east of the drop-off area. Sheet C3.5 sidewalk shown along the south and west side of the drop-off area 36. 2-06.4.9.R - Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.B A sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to any access lane or PAAL on the side where buildings are located. That said a sidewalk is required along the north, east and west side of the parking structure. 37. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 38. 2-06.4.9.W - Provide a general note stating all signage requires a separate building permit. Additional comments. 39. All proposed demo of existing buildings will require a separate demo permit. It appears the building on lot "C" is over 50 year old and will require historic review prior to approval of the demo permit. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 03/15/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | See additional documents in PRO/SIRE No objections/adverse comments. See attached. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclaimer: This report and/or data was funded in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration and/or Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. The contents of this report and/or data reflect the views and opinions of the author(s) who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily state or reflect the official views or policies of the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Arizona Department of Transportation, or any other State or Federal Agency. This report and/or data does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. The information in this publication is provided on an “as is” basis, and there are no warranties, express or implied, including, but not limited to, any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall PAG be liable for any damages resulting from the use of the information. PAG provides the information in good faith and has endeavored to create and maintain accurate data. The users of this report and/or data are advised to use the information with caution and to independently verify accuracy. ____________________________ Eric W. Kramer, Ph.D., AICP Senior Land-Use Modeler PAG40MPOhoriz3.png 1 E. Broadway Blvd, Ste. 401 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 495-1455 (tel) (520) 620-6981 (fax) www.pagregion.com ekramer@pagregion.com |
| 03/16/2016 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | March 15, 2016 ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP16-0030 PROJECT NAME: Banner UMC North PROJECT ADDRESS: NEC Campbell Ave and Allen Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT TDOT has reviewed the Traffic Impact Study and concurs with the findings and recommendations for right of way improvements at the intersection of Allen and Campbell Avenue, and improvements along Allen Rd. A private improvement agreement will need to be submitted to TDOT permits and codes prior to construction of right of way improvements. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/17/2016 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide recordation for area of proposed new right-of-way, on sheet C3.4 for example. 2. On sheet C3.5, for example, note 4 indicates sidewalks with width indicated on plan. Show dimensions on plan or reference sheets where dimensions are provided. Generally ensure all features are dimensioned clearly. 3. We recommend revising the water harvesting note on the grading sheets to indicate depths up to 6 or more inches. 4. Provide general dimensions for the retention/detention basins. 5. Provide blocks or other barricades to prevent vehicle from driving into tree planting areas within the parking areas. 6. Provide small curb openings to allow drainage to enter landscaped islands within the parking areas to the maximum practicable. |
| 03/17/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | See letter in PRO/SIRE |
| 03/17/2016 | SSHIELD1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments |
| 03/17/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 03/17/2016 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1) UDC 7.6.6.E Submit the irrigation plan. 2) AM 2-10.4.2 Complete the calculations on sheet L-100 of the landscape plans. 3) UDC 7.6.4.E Complete the Paving Schedule on the landscape plans (L-100) 4) The Landscape Plans indicate a Limit of Construction that appears to extend past the north property boundary. PAD Section 3.5.3.3 indicates the vegetation will be retained and Figure 9 indicates the existing vegetated slope. 5) The proposed Grading Plans appear to conflict with the Landscape Plan along the northern boundary. Revise the plans as necessary to accommodate the required landscaping. 6) Clarify how the proposed landscape complies with PAD Section 3.5.3.3.a which requires a tall vegetative screen. 7) Revise the last note on Sheet L-501 regarding the Box Symbol. It appears that it is also employed in areas where existing trees are indicated. |
| 03/17/2016 | SSHIELD1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/17/2016 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Per sheet AS 1.00, fire hydrants appear to be too far apart. Refer to Appendix C of the 2012 International Fire Code for spacing requirements. Certain roads will require "No Parking - Fire Lane" signs. Refer to C.O.T. amendments to Appendix D of the 2012 IFC. Please indicate locations on plans and provide a detail of approved sign. |
| 03/17/2016 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 03/17/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 03/17/2016 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/17/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Reqs Change | Trish, The City of Tucson - Environmental Services Department (ES) has completed our initial review of the Planned Area Development materials for the UMC Banner North Medical Park. The address of the development is 3838 N. Campbell Avenue in Tucson. The UMC Banner North Medical Park site is located within the service area for solid waste collection by the City of Tucson - ES and private solid waste collection companies. Access to the subject site is provided from Roger Road on the north, from Campbell Avenue on the west, from Allen Road on the south and from Wilson Avenue of the east side of the subject site for collection of refuse and recycling containers. There are no concerns about solid waste and recycling material collection and removal from the subject parcel. The September 13, 2005 Planned Area Development states that: 1. Waste collection receptacles will be located for trash collection by the City or private hauler. 2. Compaction type equipment may be used and collection from the site will be as required. 3. Solid waste collection areas will have a 6-foot high screen on three sides. ES revisions to these statements are: 1. Refuse and recycling containers will be located for collection by the City of Tucson or private hauler. 2. Compaction type equipment may be used and collection from the site will be as required. 3. Solid waste enclosure areas will have a 6-foot high masonry wall with gates to prevent unauthorized access and to visually screen the container. In addition, ES requires that the solid waste management plans for the UMC Banner North Medical Park facility comply will all of the technical requirements in Section 8: Solid Waste and Recycle, Disposal, Collection and Storage of the City of Tucson Unified Development Code. In summary, future development plan submittals for the UMC Banner North Medical Park facility shall comply with all of the technical requirements in Section 8 of the City of Tucson Unified Development Code. Please contact me if there are any questions concerning this review. Thomas G. Ryan, P.E. City of Tucson - Environmental Services Department |
| 03/17/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | I have no issues with the plans. thanks, Kara Curtis Community Service Officer Tucson Police Department Operations Division Midtown 1100 S. Alvernon Tucson, AZ 85711 kara.curtis@tucsonaz.gov (520) 837-7428 |
| 03/17/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | CENTURYLINK | Passed | |
| 03/17/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Passed | |
| 03/18/2016 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted. 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve these plans |
| 03/18/2016 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | See additional documents in PRO/SIRE 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#6111339 March 16, 2016 DSD CDRC@tucsonaz.gov To Whom It May Concern: SUBJECT: Banner North DP16-0030 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. The existing dusk to dawn lights will need to be removed. Please call (520) 918-8300 to request removal. The primary pole line south of Allen does not reflect the overhead to underground conversion. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer, Susie McCann at (520) 917-8741. Sincerely, Cathy Flynn Scheduling Coordinator Design Enclosures cc: S. McCann,TEP |
| 03/18/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/08/2016 | ARUIZ1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |