Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUB - SITE/GRADING ALL
Permit Number - DP16-0023
Review Name: RESUB - SITE/GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/13/2016 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/17/2016 | SSHIELD1 | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments |
| 06/17/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Jimmy Huls's Restaurant Development Package (2nd Review) DP16-0023 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 17, 2016 DUE DATE: June 29, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The UDC, AM & TSM can be viewed at www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd. This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is February 4, 2017. 1. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide grade slopes and a location dimension for the proposed wheel stops. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Provide a large scale detail of the accessible parking space showing all accessible requirements such as dimensions, markings, grade slopes, accessible parking aisle, signage, van accessible space and access to the accessible route. Per the 2012 IBC, Table 1106.1, the accessible vehicle parking space is required to be a van accessible parking space. Demonstrate on the detail that the accessible space meets the requirements of ICC A117.1, Section 502.2. 2. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The mounting height for the accessible sign is not correct. The sign should be 7'-0" from the bottom of the van accessible sign to grade. 3. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Remove all references to 'CLASS 1 & CLASS 2" bicycle parking from the plan as they are not applicable. These should be called out as short and long term bicycle parking. 4. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Detail 2, sheet 2 does not address the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.e, 7.4.9.B.2.f, & .g. 5. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Detail 3, sheet 2 shows a bike locker with access from both ends. The proposed location shown on the plan would not allow for access to both ends. 6. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - The provided long term bicycle parking does not appear to be correct. Based on Detail 2, sheet 2 each locker will hold two (2) bicycles and you have provided two (2) lockers for a total of four (4) long term bicycles space provided. 7. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide the square footage within the footprint of the building and the outdoor seating area. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). This includes the outdoor seating area. 8. This comment was not addressed. 2-06.4.9.R - Per IBC 1104.1 demonstrate on the plan that there is an accessible route to one of the right-of-ways that meets the requirements of IBC Chapter 11 and the ICC A117.1-2009. 9. This comment was not addressed. Per IBC 1104.1 demonstrate on the plan that there is an accessible route from the accessible vehicle parking space to the accessible entrance of the building that meets the requirements of IBC Chapter 11 and the ICC A117.1-2009. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 06/24/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 06/24/2016 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/28/2016 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1) UDC 7.6.4.C.2.c, UDC 7.6.4.F.1 Street landscape borders must be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five feet of the required ten foot width may be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area or within the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) right-of-way area on MS&R streets./ F. Use of the Public Right-of-Way Nonrequired landscaping may be placed in the public right-of-way, if the following standards are met: 1. The landscaping is approved by the City Engineer or designee and complies with the City Engineer's standards on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type; Provide written verification of approval from the TDOT City Engineer. 520-791-5100. 2) TCC Sec. 25-13. Permit required. No street, alley, public property or public right-of-way shall be cut, trenched, excavated, improved or removed or any object placed therein by any person without first having a written permit from the city. The above section applies to any landscaping or fencing. Permit requirements also apply to existing items. 3) Revise as necessary to meet requirements for sight visibility and to accommodate the sign package. UDC 7.6.5.E |