Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP16-0015
Review Name: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/04/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Raytheon Data Center Development Package (1st Review) DP16-0015 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 04, 2016 DUE DATE: Walk-Through COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is January 21, 2017. 1. This comment was not addressed AM 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of the proposed building within the footprint of the building on the plan. 2. This comment was not addressed AM 2-06.4.9.R For the sidewalk shown along the south side of the building, the proposed slope, 10.7% exceeds the allow 1:12 per ICC A117.1-2009 section 405.2 for a ramp. 3. AM 2-06.4.9.R It is not clear that an accessible route has been provided from the accessible vehicle parking space to the main entrance of the building If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 03/04/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 03/04/2016 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/04/2016 | SSHIELD1 | ADA | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments |
| 03/04/2016 | EGALLET1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/04/2016 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved |