Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP15-0196
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/05/2016 | DAVID RIVERA | HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/05/2016 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP15-0196 Address: 111 s Church Avenue Development Package: Cathedral Square - Multi-family Development TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 5, 2016 DUE DATE: January 29, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az ****************************************************************************************** Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is November 10, 2016. ****************************************************************************************** 1. Follow up comments: The Zoning Review Section has reviewed the revised DP package for compliance with UDC and TS regulations and reviewed the responses to the previous zoning review comments. Previous zoning review comments 2, 3, 8, 12 and 14 have been left as reference and will remain until the IDD review and approval process has been completed. Address the remaining comments on the next DP submittal based on the outcome of the IDD. List the case number, date and conditions of the IID approval on sheet two. The case number shall be listed next to the title block of all DP plan sheets. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 02. COMMENT: Per general note 9, this development is to be processed through the IID overlay process to obtain relief for five items. Clarify if the five items apply to Cathedral Square. This plan is being reviewed for compliance for the Cathedral Square development only and not as a contiguous site with the Marist College. The comment responses to this zoning review should be for the Cathedral Square only unless there has been some other agreement. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 03. COMMENT: List the case number of the IID in the lower right corner of all plan sheets. The IID overlay case number; date of approval and any conditions of approval shall also be included as a general note on the cover sheet. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 08. COMMENT: Until it is clear that "Parking Use" is proposed as a second principal use this comment shall be addressed. It is acknowledged that an IID is proposed and a waiver to eliminate the number of parking spaces required for the multifamily use will be requested. Clarify if the parking spaces are for the multifamily use exclusively or is the Parking for the general public? In either case, the number vehicle and motorcycle spaces should be listed as reference on the cover sheet. Compliance with the requirements of the RND, DCS, and General IID design requirements are to be reviewed by Historic, DRB, Design Professional. Provide any and all documentation related to these reviews and ensure to incorporate into the DP any modifications, revisions, etc as a result of the review processes noted above. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 12. COMMENT: It is clear that the required street building setbacks are not in compliance with the required setbacks based on developing area setbacks. However as part of the IID review process the setbacks may be waived in order to match or mimic the existing prevailing setbacks. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm. 14. COMMENT: Unless modified through the IID process the refuse collections area must comply with section 8-01. If required revise to comply. ****************************************************************************************** If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents. |
| 01/06/2016 | GARY WITTWER | COT NON-DSD | TDOT | Reqs Change | Declined: 1. Paint color for bike rakes has not changed. 2. The tree grate is on the landscape sheets that were submitted - but not on the main group of Landscape sheets. Sheet 8 - 1A vs. 2B. Gary |
| 01/11/2016 | FDILLON1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Needs Review | This project requires review by the Infill Incentive District (IID) Design Review Committee (DRC). |
| 01/15/2016 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. (General comment, pertaining to plan contents) The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Compliance with the requirements of the RND, DCS, and General IID resign requirements are to be reviewed by Historic, DRB, Design Professional. Provide any and all documentation related to these reviews and ensure to incorporate into the DP any modifications, revisions, etc as a result of the review processes noted above. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |
| 01/19/2016 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 01/21/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 01/29/2016 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | DP15-0196 / Diocese - Cathedral Square at Broadway / 2nd submittal was approved by Pima County Addressing on 01/06/16. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman Addressing Specialist Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 Description: Description: cid:image001.png@01CE70DF.60625CC0 Click here to search for Projects and Permits or to make a Payment Click here to search for Septic Records |
| 01/29/2016 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve these plans |
| 01/29/2016 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | If changes to plan are required by the IID review, The plan must be routed to Engineering. |
| 01/29/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Approv-Cond | The Development Plan has been reviewed on behalf of the Environmental Services Dept. and the following will need to be addressed on the resubmittal: Comment 2 was not fully addressed. Revise the note to contain the required wording, verbatim, as stated in the previous comment which is “The owner’s facility personnel shall roll the containers out clearly into the adjacent area on Jackson Street when the service vehicle arrives and shall roll the containers back into the building after servicing so that the service vehicle operator does not exit the truck”. If there are any questions, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net From: DSD_CDRC DSD_CDRC [DSD_CDRC.DSPO2.CHDOM2@tucsonaz.gov] Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 7:42 AM To: Ken Perry; Addressing; Andrew Connor; David Rivera; Frank Dillon; Gary Wittwer; Loren Makus; Robert Sherry; Zelin Canchola Cc: Patricia Gehlen Subject: DP15-0196 / Diocese - Cathedral Square at Broadway / 2nd submittal |
| 12/30/2015 | EGALLET1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/18/2016 | EGALLET1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |