Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP15-0196
Parcel: 11720015A

Address:
111 S CHURCH AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP15-0196
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/16/2015 KROBLES1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
11/17/2015 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
11/18/2015 CHRIS POIRIER PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change Please see additional documents in PRO.

Please see the attached plans with Addressing comments attached as sticky notes for Project #DP15-0196.
11/23/2015 FDILLON1 DESIGN PROFESSIONAL REVIEW Reqs Change This project requires RNA Design Review. FD
12/01/2015 GARY WITTWER COT NON-DSD TDOT Reqs Change I have reviewed the plans and have the following comments:

1 Please provide a tree grate detail.

2. Provide color for bike rack, bench, and steel planters (black?)

Very nice plan.
12/07/2015 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Reqs Change December 7, 2015
ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP15-0196
PROJECT NAME: The Marist on Cathedral Square
PROJECT ADDRESS: 111 South Church
PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT

Resubmittal Required: Additional information is needed. Traffic Engineering will require a Traffic Impact Statement for the proposed development.

1. The access points should have 18' radius curb returns along Jackson Street.

2. Sidewalk to remain along project is acceptable; however will be subject to repair as determined by TDOT inspector at time of work. This includes but not limited to any cracks, buckling or disrepair that is a detriment to ADA standards.


If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov
12/08/2015 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change FROM: David Rivera
Principal Planner

PROJECT: DP14-0
Address:
Development Package:

TRANSMITTAL DATE:

DUE DATE:

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az
******************************************************************************************

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is November 10, 2016.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

01. COMMENT: General note 3 indicates that the site will be developed as a mixed use development. (A mixed use development that includes "parking", a use not listed in table 5.12-GIIS-1. As part of the review and approval of the IID process the PDSD Director would review section 5.12.1 to determine if the "parking" use as a principal use is in accordance with the Purpose in section 5.12.1.) Clarify if the "Residential Multifamily" use is one principal use and there is a second principal use of "Commercial Parking" use. If there are two principal uses proposed, general note 3 shall be revised as follows,

General Note 3, the use note shall be listed in a manner that is clear as to the use as listed in the use table 4.8.4. The uses shall be listed as follows - "Residential - Multifamily Development" use and "Commercial - Parking" use. It is acknowledged that there are no applicable "Use Specific Standards" that apply to either principal use.

If the parking use is for compliance with the required parking spaces for the multifamily use the parking does not need to be listed as a separate use. If the parking area is parking for the Multifamily use and public parking, then it will have to be noted as a second principal use.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan.

02. COMMENT: Per general note 9, this development is to be processed through the IID overlay process to obtain relief for five items. Clarify if the five items apply to Cathedral Square. This plan is being reviewed for compliance for the Cathedral Square development only and not as a contiguous site with the Marist College. The comment responses to this zoning review should be for the Cathedral Square only unless there has been some other agreement.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any.

03. COMMENT: List the case number of the IID in the lower right corner of all plan sheets. The IID overlay case number; date of approval and any conditions of approval shall also be included as a general note on the cover sheet.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building;

04. COMMENT: Clarify the square footage between General note 5 and 7. General note 5 states that the building total building area is 90,000 SF with the MF use taking 78,200 SF and the Parking area 11,800 SF and in general note 7 the square footage of the paved area (is this supposed to be the parking area?) is listed as 3,322 SF.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

05. COMMENT: It appears that portion of the southeast corner of the building may be encroaching on the existing electric easement. Review the plan to ensure that there will be no issue with the easement for the electric transformer. The transformer should be drawn and labeled on the site plan sheet.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

06. COMMENT: The parking lanes on Church and Jackson should be drawn, dimensioned and labeled.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

07. COMMENT: It does not appear that all required SVT's have been drawn on the site plan sheet. Consult with the PDSD Engineering plans reviewer about the requirement for providing Sight visibility triangles at the intersections.
******************************************************************************************
2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

08. COMMENT: Until it is clear that "Parking Use" is proposed as a second principal use this comment shall be addressed. It is acknowledged that an IID is proposed and a waiver to eliminate the number of parking spaces required for the multifamily use will be requested.

Clarify if the parking spaces are for the multifamily use exclusively or is the Parking for the general public? In either case, the number vehicle and motorcycle spaces should be listed as reference on the cover sheet.

Compliance with the requirements of the RND, DCS, and General IID resign requirements are to be reviewed by Historic, DRB, Design Professional. Provide any and all documentation related to these reviews and ensure to incorporate into the DP any modifications, revisions, etc as a result of the review processes noted above.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

09. COMMENT: The location of the long term bicycle parking facilities could not be verified on the site or parking plan sheets. Ensure that the location is drawn and labeled.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.I - Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development package documents have been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes.
Projects bounded by streets having only a portion of the right-of-way width dedicated will be required to dedicate right-of-way, up to one-half, to complete the street width.
Should there be any proposed street or alley vacation, provide this information. If vacation has occurred, include the recording information.

10. COMMENT: If applicable add the ROW information as noted by the standard above.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.)

11. COMMENT: If applicable add the information as noted by the standard above.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

12. COMMENT: It is clear that the required street building setbacks are not in compliance with the required setbacks based on developing area setbacks. However as part of the IID review process the setbacks may be waived in order to match or mimic the existing prevailing setbacks.

******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

13. COMMENT: Label the actual building height (75' if finish floor is at the design grade elevation) within the building footprint. The building height shall be measured from design grade if the finish floor is not at grade.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm.

14. COMMENT: Unless modified through the IID process the refuse collections area must comply with section 8-01. If required revise to comply.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements.

15. COMMENT: Refer to the Landscape reviewer comments related to landscape and screening requirements.
******************************************************************************************



If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents.
12/09/2015 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Provide the DP activity number on each sheet.
2. On sheet 2 fill in the blanks in Earthwork note number 1. Ensure all blanks in other notes are also completed.
3. Provide a note and demonstrate on the plans that sidewalks within and adjacent to the project will be kept flood-free for up to a 10-year event. Show roof drainage patterns and surface drainage patterns.
4. Due to the proximity of this project to the Sun Link Streetcar operational right-of-way, a track access permit may be required.
5. Once the IID review has been completed, additional comments may be forthcoming.
12/10/2015 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. An approved development plan is not to be used for construction of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to the building, building sewer, site lighting, or electrical service to the building). The construction of the on-site utilities may be included with the permit for constructing the building or as a separate permit.
2. Revise the site drawing to include the invert and rim elevations of the new public manholes, along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number. If the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole is higher than the first floor elevation or is less than 12" below the first floor elevation, provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
3. Verify that a 6" building sewer will be allowed to connect to an 8" public sewer rather than connecting to a manhole. Reference: RWRD Standard Specification Section 3.2.3 (C).
12/10/2015 DAVID RIVERA HC SITE REVIEW Reqs Change Label the cross and horizontal slopes on the street sidewalks. All new sidewalks must be designed to comply accessible requirements.

Demonstrate the accessible route from the accessible parking spaces to the building.
12/10/2015 BVIESTE1 COT NON-DSD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Reqs Change The Development Package has been reviewed on behalf of the Environmental Services Dept. and the following will need to be addressed on the resubmittal:

1. Finish general note 24 by adding the expected number of collection services per week.

2. Add a general note that states the building owner’s facility personnel shall roll the containers out clearly into the adjacent area on Jackson Street when the service vehcile arrives and shall roll the containers back into the building after servicing so that the service vehicle operator does not exit the truck.

If there are any questions, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net
12/11/2015 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS

Identification and Descriptive Data

All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. (General comment, pertaining to plan contents)

The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:

Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.

Compliance with the requirements of the RND, DCS, and General IID resign requirements are to be reviewed by Historic, DRB, Design Professional. Provide any and all documentation related to these reviews and ensure to incorporate into the DP any modifications, revisions, etc as a result of the review processes noted above.

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.

Additional comments may apply.
12/11/2015 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
12/14/2015 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items:

1) Two rolled sets of the plans
2) A disk containing all items submitted
3) All items requested by review staff
4) All items needed to approve this plan

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/30/2015 EGALLET1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed