Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - TENT PLAT & CORE RESUB
Permit Number - DP15-0191
Review Name: REVISION - TENT PLAT & CORE RESUB
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/28/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/24/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Approved | DATE: August 23, 2017 FROM: Scott Neeley, AIA City of Tucson On-Call Design Professional TO: Kelly Lee, Lead Planner Planning & Development Services Department (PDSD) RE: Design Professional review comments for Flexible Lot Development Review for: DP15-0191 11311 E Mary Ann Cleveland Way 1st review This review is based upon Unified Development Code (UDC) Sections: UDC Section 8.7.3.M.1: Architectural Variation UDC Section 8.7.3.M.2: Transition Edge Treatment and Mitigation for Adjacent Properties UDC Section 8.7.3.M.3: Solar Access and Passive Solar UDC Section 8.7.3.M.4: Alternative Compliance The following review comments are provided to detail any changes required on the plans and documents submitted to PDSD prior to the Design Professional recommending approval of this project. 1. UDC Section 8.7.3.M.1: Architectural Variation Complies, with the following stipulations: 1. The same architectural variation shall not be repeated more often than every fourth lot. (Section 8.7.3.M.1.c.1) 2. No more than 50% of units shall have garages that are flush or protruding (e.g., models "Bedford", "Coronado" and "Yorktown"). (Section 8.7.3.M.1.c.3) 2. UDC Section 8.7.3.M.2: Transition Edge Treatment and Mitigation for Adjacent Properties Complies 4. UDC Section 8.7.3.M.3: Solar Access and Passive Solar Complies 5. UDC Section 8.7.3.M.4: Alternative Compliance Not applicable Additional Comments: Garages on the one-story designs are set back from the fronts of houses. Projecting front gables with windows and arched walkways leading to front doors promote a human-scaled streetscape. On the other hand, the two story designs are dominated by protruding garages. Within the limitations noted above, the designs comply with UDC requirements. However, the applicant is encouraged to consider design alternatives that decrease the dominance of garage doors and promote a more pedestrian-friendly streetscape. |
| 08/25/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/25/2017 | AHINES2 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |