Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP15-0138
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/14/2015 | AROMERO4 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/29/2015 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | Pima County approves the Development Plan (DP15-0138 / Tucson Marketplace - Theater & Anchor 3) with the understanding that the sequence number of the final plat (S15-027) will be added to the final copies once it is recorded. Please let me know if you have any questions. Warm Regards, Robin Freiman Addressing Specialist Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 11/03/2015 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Theater and Anchor 3 - Tucson Marketplace Phase 4 Development Package (2nd Review) DP15-0138 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 3, 2015 DUE DATE: November 12, 2015 The Zoning Review Section conditionally approves the development package for this project subject to the following comment. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development package to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual (TSM). 1. If the TSMR is approved provide a general note on the plan stating the TSMR number, date of approval, what was modified, if if applicable any conditions of approval on the plan. COMMENT: There is a "PROPOSED TEMPORATY 2" THICK ASPHALT PATH" called out under Construction Note 43 that does not meet the requirements of TSM 7-01.4.3.C. Either revise the composition or a Technical Standards Manual Modification must be applied for and approved prior to approval of this development package. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/03/2015 | SSHIELD1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/06/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 11/10/2015 | BVIESTE1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Reqs Change | The Development Package has been reviewed on behalf of the Environmental Services Dept. and the following will need to be addressed on the resubmittal: · General Note #27 does not include the waste stream calculations as described in TSM Section 8, but instead only states what will be provided. Add the results of the waste stream calculations to General Note #27. · The compactor enclosure is to have two feet clear on each side of the compactor per TSM 8-01.5.2.I. This means the bollards cannot be in the clear space. Provide two feet clear on each side of the compactor, including the rear side which is also less than two feet clear. Make sure there is 10 ft. clear between the bollards for those which house the front load recycling containers per the details in TSM Section 8. · The gate openings are to be 12 ft. minimum unobstructed opening per TSM 8-01.5.2.F. It appears the design of the gate hinges for these enclosures provide less than 11 ft. clear opening. If there are any questions, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net |
| 11/12/2015 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to Landscape full approval. |
| 11/13/2015 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | |
| 11/18/2015 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | DATE: November 13, 2015 TO: Jeff Behrana P.E. Optimus Engineering SUBJECT: Development Package Engineering Theater Anchor TMP Development Plan 1st Review submittal PROJECT: Tucson Market Place - Theater and Anchor Development Package LOCATION: 1500 E TUCSON MARKETPLACE BL, Ward 5 FEMA PANEL: 2237K, Zone X-Unshaded WATERSHED: Mission View Wash Watershed adjacent to Greyhound Wash Detention Area REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold P.E. ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP15-0138 SUMMARY: The Development Package within the Tucson Market Place was received and reviewed by Planning & Development Services Department Engineering Division for the 1st submittal. Development Services Department Engineering Division does not recommend approval of this Development Package until the following comments are addressed. BASE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4: Clarify in title block the case number on each sheet. MASTER COVER SHEETS/ GENERAL NOTES: 2) Tech Man Secs.4-04.14.3.2(a)-(d), 4-04.14.3.3, 4-04.1.5.1&2: Add verbiage as note regarding maintenance for drainage facilities: Owner(s) shall be solely responsible for operation, maintenance, and liability for drainage structures, and shall have an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer prepare a certified inspection report for drainage facilities at least once each year, and that these regular inspection reports will be on file with owner for review by City staff, upon written request. City staff may periodically inspect drainage facilities to verify that scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities are being performed adequately. Owner(s) agree to reimburse City for any and all costs associated with maintaining drainage facilities, should City find owner(s) deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities. SITE, GRADING, PAVING, DETAIL SHEET COMMENTS: 3) Tech Man Sec 8-01.5, Tech Man Secs.2-01.4.1.C, 8-01.5.2.G, 8-01.5.2.D:: Show dimensions and clarify solid waste area trash enclosure areas on all planview sheets to show minimum 40-ft back-up area in front of trash enclosure areas (does not match sheet DTL-2, which is correctly depicted). Assure solid waste pick-up area is elevated so as not to become a flowline for general local flows in the area. Assure dimensions are provided on detail sheet to show a minimum 10-ft clear between bollards and gate for solid waste pick-up area, and minimum 20-ft clear between interior side bollards on large enclosures. 4) Tech Man Secs.2-01.4.1.C, 8-01.5.2.G: with keynotes for planviews, specify type of cover (labeling a sized gravel or vegetation per landscape plans) for area between perimeter and southern access area, as well as area between sidewalks and parking curbed medians. SURVEY/UTILITIES / EASEMENTS COMMENTS: 5) Provide local Basis of Elevation location labeled and identified a planview. SOILS/GEOTECHNICAL REPORT COMMENTS: 6) Tech Man Secs.4-04.2.3.1.6.A.4.d, 4-03.2.2, 2-01, 4-03.III.3.5.1.3.a: Provide copy of soils report with pavement structural design recommendations and other recommendations. For resubmittal, provide revised development package including soils report, revised plans, with response letter, and any other documents. If you have questions, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Dept |
| 11/18/2015 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Based on email discussion with EOR, PDSD Engineering recommends conditional approval - will stamp once plans are returned to office. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/25/2015 | AROMERO4 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |