Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP15-0138
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/19/2015 | CPIERCE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/24/2015 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on the submittal and supports its acceptance. Thank you. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. . |
| 08/25/2015 | MPADILL1 | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Passed | No comment. |
| 08/26/2015 | BVIESTE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Approved | See additional documents in PRO. August 26, 2015 City of Tucson CDRC Attn: Patricia Gehlen, Manager 201 N. Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ 85701 RE: SWG Plan Review for Tucson Marketplace Phase 4 - Theatre & Anchor 3 Development Plans - CDRC No. DP15-0138 Dear Ms. Gehlen: Southwest Gas Corporation (SWG) has no objection to the development of the above-mentioned project. Existing 4" and 2" natural gas mains are located in utility easements adjacent to the area of development and may be affected by construction of this project. Blue Stake and potholing are suggested for best accuracy when locating SWG facilities. Please be aware that SWG requires a minimum one-foot separation from distribution facilities and any proposed structures and two-foot separation from high pressure gas facilities. SWG requests the contractor use caution when working in the vicinity of gas facilities and protect and support gas facilities per Blue Stake requirements. SWG also requests that no trees be planted within close proximity to gas facilities due to root intrusion; therefore, SWG requires all tree placements have a minimum eight-foot clearance from the tree center line to existing or proposed gas facilities. Shrubs and bushes may be planted within the eight-foot clearance zone. All information is provided for reference use only. Please note that it is the responsibility of excavators or those developers planning excavation to verify actual field conditions in advance of construction so that requests for gas service or any potential issues can be addressed in a timely manner, including payment for conflict mitigation if applicable. Please include SWG in all future development plan submittals of this project. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact me at (520) 794-6218 or TUCSWGDevReview@swgas.com. Sincerely, Arthur Lason Engineering Technician Southern Arizona Division Enc: SWG Contact Information and Excavators Responsibilities (pdf) |
| 08/27/2015 | BVIESTE1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | 201 N. STONE AV, 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 MICHELENE NOWAKADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 721-9512 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: MICHELENE NOWAK, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: 201 N. STONE AV, 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 MICHELENE NOWAKADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 721-9512 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: MICHELENE NOWAK, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: DP15-0138 TUCSON MARKETPLACE PHASE 5-THEATER & ANCHOR 3/DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1ST REVIEW DATE: AUGUST 27, 2015 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: THE PLAT OF: TUCSON MARKETPLACE PHASE 4 LOTS 1-9 (S15-027) MUST BE RECORDED AND SEQUENCE# INSERTED INTO THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN ON ALL SHEETS BEFORE ANY ADDRESSES CAN BE ISSUED. 1.) Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Final Plat to City Planning ***PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING MUST RECEIVE A COPY OF THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN PRIOR TO THE ASSIGNMENT OF ANY ADDRESSES. PLEASE COORDINATE THE DELIVERY WITH THE CITY OF TUCSON PLANNING*** 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files. These CAD files can be e-mailed to: CADsubmittals@pima.gov The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** 3/DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1ST REVIEW DATE: AUGUST 27, 2015 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: THE PLAT OF: TUCSON MARKETPLACE PHASE 4 LOTS 1-9 (S15-027) MUST BE RECORDED AND SEQUENCE# INSERTED INTO THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN ON ALL SHEETS BEFORE ANY ADDRESSES CAN BE ISSUED. 2.) Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Final Plat to City Planning ***PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING MUST RECEIVE A COPY OF THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN PRIOR TO THE ASSIGNMENT OF ANY ADDRESSES. PLEASE COORDINATE THE DELIVERY WITH THE CITY OF TUCSON PLANNING*** 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files. These CAD files can be e-mailed to: CADsubmittals@pima.gov The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
| 09/01/2015 | BVIESTE1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | See additional document in PRO. Good morning, Our response letter for water availability for 1500 E. Tucson Marketplace Blvd. Kellie Anderson Tucson Water/New Development Administrative Assistant 520-837-2165 520-791-4718 520-791-2501 (fax) Kellie.Anderson@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/08/2015 | BVIESTE1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Reqs Change | The Development Package has been reviewed on behalf of the Environmental Services Dept. and the following will need to be addressed on the resubmittal: 1. Per TSM 8-01.4.0B, add the note specifying the anticipated method of collection and frequency based on the calculated tonnage from Table 1 for the intended uses. 2. The enclosure detail 1 on Sheet DTL-2 needs to have #4 rebars, 12 inches on center both ways in the slabs of both the enclosures and the aprons per the Figures in TSM Section 8. Call out the locations of all the cane bolt holes. Identify the size of the bollards and their distances from the enclosure walls. Show the two feet clear areas on each side of the compactor per TSM 8-01.5.2.J. 3. It doesn’t appear the service vehicle will be able to approach the compactor enclosure to the SW of Anchor 3 and the enclosures to the SW of the Theater in line with the enclosures per TSM section 8-01.5.3.H. Show how the service vehicle can approach the enclosures using the turning template in Figure 7 of TSM Section 8 without multiple back and forth turning movements. Refer to 8-01.5.3.E for maneuvering requirements and to Figure 5 for the standard details for placement of enclosures off PAALs. If there are any questions, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net |
| 09/08/2015 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 09/08/2015 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Theater and Anchor 3 - Tucson Marketplace Phase 4 Development Package (1st Review) DP15-0138 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 10, 2015 DUE DATE: September 15, 2015 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is August 16, 2016. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.1.1 PURPOSE This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. 2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review. 2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided. The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application: 2-06.2.1 Application Form A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee; 2-06.2.2 Development Package A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein; 2-06.2.3 Related Reviews In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the; 2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and, 2-06.2.5 Fees Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 1. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP15-0138, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2. COMMENT: Provide development package case number, DP15-0103, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 3. COMMENT: Revise case numbers, D12-0113, D13-0227 & D13-0228 to include the P, i.e. DP12-0113, DP13-0227 & DP13-0228. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 4. COMMENT: Provide documentation that the requirements of PAD 15 Section C.6 Design Review Committee and Design Guidelines has been addressed. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building; 5. COMMENT: Floor area information for DP15-0103 needs to be added to sheet DP-2, tracking tables. 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage; 6. COMMENT: Floor area ratio (FAR) information for DP15-0103 needs to be added to sheet 2, Tracking tables. 2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met. 7. COMMENT: Update sheet 2, Tracking tables to include all applicable data from DP15-0103. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 8. COMMENT: There are "EXIST. 15' WTR. ESMT." shown through out the plan, see orange highlight, provide the recordation information on the plan. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 9. COMMENT: It does not appear that the required and provided number of accessible vehicle parking are correct. Per IBC Table 1106.1 - 573 vehicle parking space provide, 573 x 2% = 11 accessible vehicle parking spaces required. 10. COMMENT: Detail 13 sheet DTL-1 provide a width dimension for the standard vehicle parking space. 11. COMMENT: Vehicle parking space information for DP15-0103 needs to be added to sheet DP-2, tracking tables. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route. Provide as a note the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, whether the loading space is a Type A or B as provided in UDC Section 7.5.4. 12. COMMENT: Provide a loading space calculation on sheet DP-2. Update the tracking tables to include all required and provided loading spaces. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 13. COMMENT: Short and long term bicycle parking space information for DP15-0103 needs to be added to sheet DP-2, tracking tables. 14. COMMENT: Detail 9 sheet DTL-1 add the 2'-6" dimension to the sides of the rack form a wall or obstruction, see UDC Article 7.4.9B.2.g and figure 7.4.9-C. 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. 15. COMMENT: There are "PROP. 15' WTR. ESMT." shown through out the plan, see green highlight, provide the recordation information on the plan. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual (TSM). 16. COMMENT: There is a "PROPOSED TEMPORATY 2" THICK ASPHALT PATH" called out under Construction Note 43 that does not meet the requirements of TSM 7-01.4.3.C. Either revise the composition or a Technical Standards Manual Modification must be applied for and approved prior to approval of this development package. 17. COMMENT: There are numerous sidewalks through out the plan that need to have width dimensions provided, see blue highlights. 18. COMMENT: There is an accessible route/sidewalk that runs east from the accessible vehicle parking spaces shown east of the theater and ends at an access lane, go no where. Provide some type of signage the will provide warning that the accessible route goes no where. 19. COMMENT: Sheet SP-4 southern most east/west running sidewalk there are two (2) proposed light poles that encroach into the sidewalk area. 20. COMMENT: Sheet SP-5 near the northeast corner of Anchor 3 there are four (4) boxes shown, clarify what these are and if necessary show clear sidewalk widths. 21. COMMENT: Detail 13 sheet DTL-1 provide a clear width dimension that shows that the minimum required 4' width is maintained between the proposed accessible sign and the edge of the sidewalk. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 22. COMMENT: If applicable show locations and types of proposed signs. Also provide a note stating "ALL PROPOSED SIGNAGE REQUIRES A SEPARATE PERMIT". Additional comments. 23. COMMENT: Sheet DP-1 text block located lower center of the sheet, remove the reference to "TENTATIVE PLAT COMBO" from the plan as it is not applicable. 24. COMMENT: Provide the recordation information for the plat shown through out the plan, see pink highlights. 25. COMMENT: The match lines appear to cover up drawing information. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 09/10/2015 | SSHIELD1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Theater and Anchor 3 - Tucson Marketplace Phase 4 Accessibility Review - On Site Only Development Package (1st Review) DP15-0138 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 10, 2015 DUE DATE: September 15, 2015 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: It does not appear that the required and provided number of accessible vehicle parking are correct. Per IBC Table 1106.1 - 573 vehicle parking space provide, 573 x 2% = 11 accessible vehicle parking spaces required. 2. COMMENT: Provide spot grades for the proposed asphalt path called out under construction note 35 so the cross slopes and running slopes can be verified per ICC A117.1-2009 403.3 and IBC 107.2.1 3. COMMENT: Detail 9 sheet DTL-2 provide a dimension from the bottom of the accessible sign and the van accessible sign to finish grade. This dimension should be 7'-0" to both. |
| 09/10/2015 | BVIESTE1 | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | I have no issues with this proposal. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept. 1100 S. Alvernon Tucson, AZ 85711 520-837-7428 |
| 09/14/2015 | BVIESTE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/14/2015 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Rezoning case; Subdivision case; Board of Adjustment case; Design Development Option case; Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or, Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
| 09/14/2015 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: September 14, 2015 TO: Jeff Behrana P.E. Optimus Engineering SUBJECT: Development Package Engineering Re-plat Block 6 / Development Plan 1st Review submittal PROJECT: Tucson Market Place - Theater and Anchor Development Package LOCATION: 1500 E TUCSON MARKETPLACE BL, Ward 5 FEMA PANEL: 2237K, Zone X-Unshaded WATERSHED: Mission View Wash Watershed adjacent to Greyhound Wash Detention Area REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold P.E. ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP15-0138 SUMMARY: The Development Package that includes the Grading Plan and SWPP, within the Tucson Market Place was received and reviewed by Planning & Development Services Department Engineering Division for the 1st submittal. Development Services Department Engineering Division does note recommend approval of this Development Package until the following comments are addressed. BASE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4: Clarify in title block the project descriptions which lots this development is a part of within TMP (lots 7, 8 and portion of 9). MASTER COVER SHEETS/ GENERAL NOTES: 2) Tech Man Secs.4-04.14.3.2(a)-(d), 4-04.14.3.3, 4-04.1.5.1&2: Add verbiage as note regarding maintenance for drainage facilities: Owner(s) shall be solely responsible for operation, maintenance, and liability for drainage structures, and shall have an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer prepare a certified inspection report for drainage facilities at least once each year, and that these regular inspection reports will be on file with owner for review by City staff, upon written request. City staff may periodically inspect drainage facilities to verify that scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities are being performed adequately. Owner(s) agree to reimburse City for any and all costs associated with maintaining drainage facilities, should City find owner(s) deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities. 3) Address all Zoning comments regarding dimensions of sidewalks and other hardscape features. 4) Note 31 on cover sheet may need to be revised to state that tackifier may be used for future development areas/ future pad areas. Anchor lots that have permit underway may remain as is unless development does not proceed. Other areas on the plans that are missing permanent erosion control or cover shall be revised to specify type of cover - vegetation or gravel. DRAINAGE COMMENTS: 5) Tech Man Sec.4-04.2.3.1: Address the following drainage-grading related comments: a) Show scuppers along sides of buildings beneath walkways where roof drainage is indicated, and also show roof drainage flow arrows on planviews. b) Provide details/cross sections for stormdrain system where utility lines cross to assure no conflict. GRADING, PAVING, DETAIL SHEET COMMENTS: 6) Tech Man Secs.2-01.4.1.C, 8-01.5.2.G: Address the following grading comments: a) Revise note regarding options for stormdrain pipe; please consider specifying type of pipe as either CMP or RCP, as plastic pipes have been recently catching on fire. b) Specify type of cover (labeling a sized gravel or vegetation per landscape plans) for area between perimeter and trail, as well as area between trail and parking infrastructure. c) Clarify and add construction information for any locations of stormdrain to cross under trail. d) Add additional spot elevations to planviews to show how waterharvesting areas receive stormwater runoff. e) Tech Man Secs.2-01.4.1.C, 8-01.5.2.G, 8-01.5.2.D: Address the following refuse container comments by adding details to show the following information: i) Label minimum 2% slope away within trash enclosure pad. Assure solid waste pick-up area is elevated so as not to become a flowline for general local flows in the area. ii) Add note that refuse container gates shall be opaque (no see-through gates allowed). iii) Provide interior bollards and assure min. 10-ft (or min. 20-ft for double enclosure) is dimensioned between lateral bollards and min.10-ft is dimensioned between rear bollards and inside of gate. SURVEY/UTILITIES / EASEMENTS COMMENTS: 7) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.8.B, 2-06.4.9.L: All existing and proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, TCE, maintenance, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. Provide title report with resubmittal. 8) Provide local Basis of Elevation location labeled and identified a planview. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN COMMENTS: 9) Provide copies of SWP exhibits in SWP report. SOILS/GEOTECHNICAL REPORT COMMENTS: 10) Tech Man Secs.4-04.2.3.1.6.A.4.d, 4-03.2.2, 2-01, 4-03.III.3.5.1.3.a: Provide copy of soils report with pavement structural design recommendations and other recommendations. For resubmittal, provide revised development package including soils report, title report, revised grading plan, revises SWP report, with comprehensive response letter, and any other documents. If you have questions, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Dept |
| 09/15/2015 | KBROUIL1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 09/15/2015 | BVIESTE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | See additional documents in PRO. TEP 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 September 15, 2015 Optimus Civil Design Group Attn: Jeff Behrana 4650 E Cotton Center Blvd, Suite 200 Phoenix, AZ 85040 Dear Jeff: SUBJECT: TUCSON MARKETPLACE PHASE 4 - THEATER AND ANCHOR 3 DP15-0138 WR #297487 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted August 19th, 2015. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer, Jennifer Necas, at (520) 918-8295. Sincerely, Natalie R Nava Scheduling Coordinator Design/Build Enclosures CC: Jennifer Necas, Tucson Electric Power Company CC: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) |
| 09/16/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. An approved development plan is not to be used for construction of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to the building, building sewer, site lighting, or electrical service to the building). The construction of the on-site utilities may be included with the permit for constructing the building or as a separate permit. 2. For commercial use, Tucson Water will allow no more than one meter per building (i.e. manifolding meters is not allowed, the meter shall be capable of serving the total building demand). |
| 09/17/2015 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 09/17/2015 | BVIESTE1 | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/17/2015 | BVIESTE1 | UTILITIES | CENTURYLINK | Passed | |
| 09/17/2015 | BVIESTE1 | UTILITIES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Passed | |
| 09/17/2015 | BVIESTE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | See additional documents in PRO. No objections/adverse comments. See attached |
| 09/17/2015 | BVIESTE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 09/17/2015 | BVIESTE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 09/21/2015 | BVIESTE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve this plan |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/14/2015 | AROMERO4 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |