Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP15-0131
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/13/2015 | AROMERO4 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/17/2015 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP15-0131 Address: 3526 E. Fort Lowell Road Development Package: AGM Container - Precision Manufacturing Use TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 18, 2015 DUE DATE: September 9, 2015 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is August 11, 2016. - List as a general note: "Existing zoning is ____." 01. COMMENT: The zoning has been effectuated and shall be listed accordingly. The overall zoning of the property is P-I and P. Revise General Note 2 accordingly. ****************************************************************************************** - Floor area for each building; 02. COMMENT: Under the parking calculations matrix table, specifically the second column, include the word "Building" in the title box. ****************************************************************************************** - Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included; and, 03. COMMENT: Add an expansion calculation under the general notes. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. 04. COMMENT: A Pima County Tax Parcel combo for the parking lot parcel and the overall site parcel must be completed prior to approval of the DP. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 00. COMMENT: It is not clear on sheet two if there is a sidewalk along the southern area of the new building. The concrete area is not annotated on sheet two, however on sheet 4 the same location is annotated as a concrete swale. Annotate appropriately on sheet two. The crosswalks connections on both sheets do not match. Verify the locations end ensure consistency between sheets 2 and 4. Also, on sheet two there is a crosswalk on the northeast corner of the site but one is not shown on sheet four. Address all inconsistencies between the two sheets. Ensure that sheets 2 and 4 match. There are inconsistencies between the two drawings. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. 00. COMMENT: See the Landscape reviewer's comments related to required screening or landscape buffers. ****************************************************************************************** If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents. |
| 08/20/2015 | DAVID RIVERA | HC SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning Comments |
| 09/02/2015 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: September 2, 2015 DUE DATE: September 9, 2015 SUBJECT: AGM Commercial Building TO: SBBL Architecture and Planning, Thomas Brown, RA LOCATION: 3526 E Fort Lowell Road REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM ACTIVITY: DP15-0131 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. The following items need to be addressed: 1) Per TSM 8-01.5.1D where a development is intending to provide centralized storage and collection to serve multiple buildings, tenants, or businesses, a general note must be included within the plan stating "A single property owner, property management company, or home owners association (HOA), will be responsible for the management and maintenance of the solid waste collection services and storage area(s) for all development/business occupants." Please add the appropriate notation. 2) Per TSM 8-01.5.2G the percent slope of the concrete service apron away from the trash enclose must be a minimum of 2%. Please update sheet 5 to show 2.0% slope away from the trash enclosure. This will require moving the new 4' wide concrete flow gutter such that it does not overlap with the trash enclosure. 3) Per AM 2-06.4.3 please provide the development plan number DP15-0131. 4) Per TSM 7-01.4.1E Drainage flowing across all pedestrian paths shall be conveyed under the path for up to and including the ten-year frequency flood events. Please update layout on sheet 2 such that the striped crosswalk called out by keynote 5 does not allow drainage to flow over it. There is a different location for this path as shown on sheets 3, 4 and 5 that needs to be consistent across the development. 5) Per AM 2.06.4.8B the ingress/egress/vehicular parking easement should be vacated/ reconfigured prior to approval of this plan. Please show new configuration and recording information for abandonment of existing easement. Alternatively, written permission may be obtained from the easement holder to maintain the easement while the plan is approved. 6) Per TSM 7.01.4.1E the roof drainage should not be conveyed over the sidewalk in front of new building. Please show where roof drainage is being conveyed such that it is not being passed over the sidewalk. 7) Per UDC 7.4.6G please add striping that meets the criteria in figure 7.4.6-A for parking spaces as delineated by curb stops via keynote 20 on sheet 4. If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 09/08/2015 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 09/08/2015 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/08/2015 | BVIESTE1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Reqs Change | The Development Package has been reviewed on behalf of the Environmental Services Dept. and the following will need to be addressed on the resubmittal: 1. Refer to engineering comments 1 and 2. Add the note and show the revised grading on the apron. Move the concrete valley gutter alignment to allow for the grading revisions. If there are any questions, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net |
| 09/08/2015 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/09/2015 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please indicate existing and/or proposed fire hydrants, with dimensions to property lines. Refer to 2012 IFC, section 507 for spacing requirements. |
| 09/10/2015 | BVIESTE1 | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | I have no issues with this request. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept. 1100 S. Alvernon Tucson, AZ 85711 520-837-7428 |
| 09/11/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 09/14/2015 | BVIESTE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve this plan |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/30/2015 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |