Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP15-0081
Review Name: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/30/2015 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/13/2015 | DAVID RIVERA | HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/13/2015 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP15-0081 (2nd Review) Address: 912 S 6th Avenue Development Package: DP15-0081 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 13, 2015 DUE DATE: October 15, 2015 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 15, 2015. 1. Follow up to previous comment 01: The sheet numbers associated with the sheets must be listed in the sheet index, for example 1 - Cover sheet, 2 - site plan or if you want to keep the designations based on the sheet types use the following in the sheet index, sheet 1 - S-1 Existing Site plan, Sheet 2 - S-2 Proposed Site etc. 2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). 01. COMMENT: The sheet index must include the sheet number, i.e. 1, 2, 3. The label in the sheet index are listed as C-01, C-02 etc. but the sheets are labeled with C-1, C-2 etc. revise sheet pagination labels to match what is on index or visa versa. ********************************************************************* 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. Follow up to previous comment 03: As noted in my previous comment Use Specific Standard 4.9.9.G.3 is not applicable to this use in the C-3 Zone. Remove the .3 note from the UDC table in the lower left corner of sheet 1. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 03. COMMENT: Identify correctly the use per the UDC. The Land Use group is Retail Trade Use Group, not Commercial Services. The land use class is correct as listed but the Use Specific Standards section numbers must be listed in the table. 4.9.9.G.1 & .2. You have included .3 in the table but it is not one of the use specific standards listed in table 4.8-4. Revise the tables as required. ********************************************************************* 3. Follow up comment to previous comment 12: The building setback as requested per previous comment was not added to the site plan. Add the building setback from the nearest edge of travel lane to the proposed canopy facing Russell Avenue 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 12. COMMENT: Label the building setback from the edge of travel lane on Russell Avenue to the Canopy. The minimum setback is 21 feet from the edge of travel lane. ********************************************************************* If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents. |
| 10/13/2015 | DAVID RIVERA | ADA | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/14/2015 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The following comment were not addressed for previous review: To enhance the visual appearance of the streetscape, a street landscape border is required in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1 along the street frontage of a site as follows: Minimum Width A street landscape border, is a landscape area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet, running the full length of the street property line(s) bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress. Russell Ave. is a named street and requires a landscape buffer. Ensure that all Zoning comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |