Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP15-0081
Parcel: 11708223A

Address:
912 S 6TH AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP15-0081
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/29/2015 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
06/15/2015 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change FROM: David Rivera
Principal Planner

PROJECT: DP14-0081
Address: 912 S 6th Avenue
Development Package: DP15-0081

TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 15, 2015

DUE DATE: June 23, 2015

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 15, 2015.


2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.1 - Each sheet shall measure 24 inches by 36 inches and include a minimum one inch margin on left side and one-half inch margin on all other sides to facilitate efficient record keeping. A larger sheet format may be used with the approval of the Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD).

2-06.3.2 - All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than 50 feet to the inch. This scale is the minimum accepted to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for record-keeping purposes. The same scale shall be used for all sheets within the set. Smaller scales (60:1 or greater) may be used for some or all of the sheets with the prior approval of PDSD when it is determined legibility and the ability to be digitized and/or reduced for archiving will not be affected.
2-06.3.3 - All lettering and text (upper or lower case), and numbering, shall be a minimum of three-thirty-seconds inches in height to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for archiving.


2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet.
2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

01. COMMENT: The sheet index must include the sheet number, i.e. 1, 2, 3. The label in the sheet index are listed as C-01, C-02 etc. but the sheets are labeled with C-1, C-2 etc. revise sheet pagination labels to match what is on index or visa versa.
*********************************************************************

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS



2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled.

02. COMMENT: Revise in the location map the section corners correctly. See redlines.
*********************************************************************


2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

03. COMMENT: Identify correctly the use per the UDC. The Land Use group is Retail Trade Use Group, not Commercial Services. The land use class is correct as listed but the Use Specific Standards section numbers must be listed in the table. 4.9.9.G.1 & .2. You have included .3 in the table but it is not one of the use specific standards listed in table 4.8-4. Revise the tables as required.
*********************************************************************

2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan.

2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any.

04. COMMENT: Based on the plan submitted for review, it is assumed, that the GIID overlay is not being utilized, therefore Zoning has reviewed the DP under the underlying zone C-3 requirements.
*********************************************************************

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage;

05. COMMENT: There is no lot coverage requirement for this use. Remove any information related to lot coverage. There is no floor area minimum or maximum required by the UDC for this use.
*********************************************************************

2-06.4.7.C - Streets and Roads Notes

2-06.4.7.C.2 - List the following note on all development package documents: "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual."

06. COMMENT: List as a general note on the cover sheet, the statement as noted in the standard above.
*********************************************************************

2-06.4.7.E.1.a - The following notes will be placed on all plans/plats.

2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

07. COMMENT: If applicable to this site, draw, label, and dimension any existing easements on the site.
*********************************************************************

2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

08. COMMENT: Label the zoning classifications across the street from the subject site as noted by the standard above.
*********************************************************************


2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned.

09. COMMENT: Label 6th Avenue as Public.
*********************************************************************

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

10. COMMENT: After review of the parking calculation requirements it is clear that 7 parking spaces are required including one van accessible parking space. Per the plan there is only one customer parking space shown on the plan. All other spaces are annotated as display area. If 7 parking spaces are required 7 spaces must be provided and they cannot be counted towards the display area. Define the required number of parking spaces separate from the vehicle display area.
*********************************************************************


2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan

2-06.4.9.M.2 - Concurrent Review. For all projects, grading plans may be included in the development package and will be reviewed concurrently.

11. COMMENT: Ensure that any changes that are made to the DP site plan are made to the grading plan sheet.
*********************************************************************

2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

12. COMMENT: Label the building setback from the edge of travel lane on Russell Street to the Canopy. The minimum setback is 21 feet from the edge of travel lane.
*********************************************************************

2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

13. COMMENT: The pedestrian connection from the office on the north side of the site must connect to the 19th Street sidewalk.
*********************************************************************

2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

14. COMMENT: If applicable draw, label, and dimensions any proposed freestanding monument signs.
*********************************************************************
2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements.

15. COMMENT: See the landscape reviewer comments related to landscaping and screening requirements.
*********************************************************************


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents.
06/16/2015 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Revise the site drawing to include the invert and rim elevations of the upstream and downstream manholes; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
06/17/2015 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change .DATE: June 17, 2015
DUE DATE: June 23, 2015
SUBJECT: AAFMCO Auto Sales Development Plan Package- Engineering Review
TO: JACA Designs LLC
LOCATION: 912 S 6th Ave; T14S R13E Sec13
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP15-0081

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package and Drainage Report (RMJR Engineering & Development Co., 19MAY15). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the following link for further clarification:
http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

The following items need to be addressed:

SITE PLAN:

1) AM Sec.2-06.4.2.D: Revise the development plan package and the Sheet Index to correctly reference the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). The label in the sheet index are listed as C-01, C-02 etc. but the sheets are labeled with C-1, C-2 etc. revise sheet pagination labels to match what is on index or visa versa.

2) AM Sec.2-06.4.4.C: Revise the development plan package and Project Location map to correctly label the Section corners.

3) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.C.2: Revise the development plan package to provide a General Note to read per the referenced section; "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual."

4) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.C: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension all existing right-of-ways, existing and future (if applicable). 6Th Ave needs to have the existing/future right-of-way dimensioned in plan view. Per the MS&R Maps it appears that the existing right-of-way is the effectuated future right-of-way, label accordingly.

5) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.C: Revise the development plan package to label 6th Ave as "Public."

6) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.C: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension all existing sidewalks located within the right-of-way of 6th Avenue and Russell Avenue.

7) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the driveway entrances at 19th Street and Russell Avenue.

8) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan package to label the required minimum 25-foot radii at both curb returns for the new driveway entrance and 6th Ave, per TSM Sec.10-01.3.2.C and Figure 6.

9) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.2: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the SVT dimensions for all driveway entrances at the intersection of Public Streets, refer to TSM Sec.10-01.5.3 for line of sight matrix.

10) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a Revise the development plan package to provide a standard vehicle parking space detail. Verify on the detail the required 2.5 foot overhang for spaces adjacent to sidewalks, landscape areas, wall, handicap parking signage, etc. Refer to UDC Figure 7.4.6-C for the 2.5 foot overhang dimension. It appears from plan view that the handicap parking signs at the handicap parking space encroaches into the required 2.5 foot overhang.

11) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan package to label Keynote #4 throughout the site plan sheet for the proposed curbing that is required around the vehicular use area.

12) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan package to revise all detail call out in plan view to ensure they reference the correct sheet the detail is located on. Specifically Detail 1/S-1 should read 1/S-3, revise.

13) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.J: Revise the development plan package and Section A/G-2 to remove all of the proposed future right-of-way improvements or provide verification from TDOT that this will be required. Per the MS&R Maps the future right-of-way for 6th Avenue is already effectuated therefore there should not be any future curb or sidewalk locations.

14) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Per TSM Sec.4-04.14.3.2: Provide a note on the development plan package to state that, "(a) the owner or owners shall be solely responsible for operation, maintenance, and liability for all detention/retention basins, drainage infrastructure, drainage channels and water harvesting areas; (b) that the owner or owners shall have an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage and detention/retention facilities at lease once every 12-months, and that these regular inspection reports will be on file with the owner for review by City staff, upon written request; (c) that City staff may periodically inspect the drainage and retention/detention facilities to verify that scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and (d) that the owner or owners agree to reimburse the City for any and all costs associated with the maintaining of the detention/retention basins and drainage structures should the City find the owner or owners deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities."

15) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Revise the development plan package to provide a grading/drainage note specifying conformance with City of Tucson Technical Standards Manual Sec.2-01 (excavation and grading requirements).

16) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Revise the development plan package to provide a General Note to state; "Call for a Pre-construction meeting prior to start of earthwork. To schedule a PDSD Pre-construction meeting, SWPPP inspection or general Engineering Inspections, call IVR (740-6970), or schedule with a Customer Service Representative at the Planning Development Services Department, or contact PDSD Engineering at 791-5550 extension 2101, or schedule inspections online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Online_Services/Online_Permits/online_permits.html

17) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.2: Revise the development plan package and Detail 14/S-3 to provide the detail reference in Keynote #2 for the proposed curb opening. The curb opening detail appears to be Detail 5/S-3.

18) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.2: Revise the development plan package and Sheet G-1 for the keynote call out located at the east side of the proposed building. Currently the detail calls out a wall however plan view keynotes it as a curb opening, revise.

19) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan package to include a pedestrian access path to all adjacent streets that have public access. The sidewalk that is shown to 19th Ave needs to connect to the existing sidewalk within the right-of-way.

20) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan package to ensure that the sidewalk located along the south side of the new building adjacent to the vehicular use area has a minimum 6-inch reveal. Per the detail call out it references Detail 4,6/S-3, but Detail 4/S-3 show a zero inch reveal and Detail 6/S-3 does not provide a dimension, revise.

21) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project.

22) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.S: Revise the development plan package to verify conformance with handicap accessibility for the existing sidewalk within the right-of-way. Provide existing longitudinal and cross slopes to ensure maximum 2% or provide written approval from TDOT Permits and Codes that the existing sidewalk meets accessibility requirements.

GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Plan Package that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
06/23/2015 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Approved
06/23/2015 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS

Identification and Descriptive Data

All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.

Remove the words proposed and future from Sheet L-1 of the landscape plan.

To enhance the visual appearance of the streetscape, a street landscape border is required in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1 along the street frontage of a site as follows:

Minimum Width
A street landscape border, is a landscape area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet, running the full length of the street property line(s) bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress. Russell Ave. is a named street and requires a landscape buffer.

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.

Additional comments may apply.
06/24/2015 DAVID RIVERA H/C SITE REVIEW Reqs Change See the ADA comments.
06/24/2015 DRIVERA1 ADA REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: David Rivera
Principal Planner

PROJECT: DP15-0081
912 S 6th Avenue
Retail Use - Auto Vehicle Rental and Sales

TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 24, 2015

DUE DATE: June 23, 2015

COMMENTS:

01. Label the accessible route from the street to the office buildings on site.

02. Label the running and cross slopes on all sidewalks and crosswalks.

03. On sheet 5, add the reference to the symbols used to designate elevations, i.e. (N) FC, (E) FC, (E) GS. What do they stand for? Add the information to the legend.

Add the direction arrow symbol for the ramp and label whether the arrow is point up or down.

04. It does not appear that the office along the north side of the site has been provided with an accessible path. Demonstrate accessibility to the office building.

05. Label the cross and running slopes proposed for the Accessible parking areas.

06. The height of the accessible parking is to be measured from grade to the bottom of the Van Accessible sign. Revise the detail as required.



If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/26/2015 FERNE RODRIGUEZ OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed