Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP15-0069
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/24/2015 | KROBLES1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/03/2015 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP15-0069 Address: 537 N. 6th Avenue Development Package: Multi-use in an existing building/site TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 3, 2015 DUE DATE: August 21, 2015 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 15, 2015. 01. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: List the IID case number in the lower right corner of the plans sheets. I am not 100% sure but I do not believe that the IID plans are assigned case numbers as has been labeled on the revised plan sheets. Label the IID case number on the plan sheets with the assigned case number. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. PREVIOUS COMMENT 03: This project has been assigned the new case number DP15-0069. List the case number as noted above. This project is also within the GIID ****************************************************************************************** 02. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: The total number of vehicle parking spaces for the uses cannot be met on the TB site. A variance for the number of required vehicle parking spaces is required or must be varied / waived through the IID process. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. PREVIOUS COMMENT 10: The design criteria related to back up spurs must be reviewed in Section 7.4.6. Include on sheet 4, a dimensioned detail drawing of a standard parking space. ****************************************************************************************** 03. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: The location of the loading zone will require a variance approval or approval through the IID process. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route. Provide as a note the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, whether the loading space is a Type A or B as provided in UDC Section 7.5.4. PREVIOUS COMMENT 11: The loading zone has been placed in the middle of the PAAL of the parking lot. The Loading zone may be co-located in the approach area for dumpster locations or in Drive-through aisles when safety and access issues are properly addressed. However there is nothing in the code or DLS that allows for placement of a loading zone in the PAAL. Revise the plan or a B of A variance will be required unless a modification through the IID review process is applicable. ****************************************************************************************** 04. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: The location of the Bicycle parking will require a variance approval or approval through the IID process. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. PREVIOUS COMMENT 12: When there are existing or proposed bicycle racks in the right-of-way, the PDSD Director may allow a modification to the required number of bicycle parking spaces based on a finding from the City's Bicycle Coordinator that the number of existing racks will adequately serve the proposed use and other nearby uses the racks currently serve. ****************************************************************************************** 05. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: Any landscape requirements that cannot be met will require a variance approval or approval through the IID process. 2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required, in accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. PREVIOUS COMMENT 20: See the landscape reviewer comments related to Landscape buffers and screening. ****************************************************************************************** 06. COMMENT: A separate IID plan review is required by the assigned PSDS Design Professional. List a s general note the case number, date of approval and any conditions of approval. Revise the plans to include any recommendations or requirements resulting from the PDSD Design Professional review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents. |
| 08/12/2015 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Include with re-submittal IID approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site, grading and landscape plans, the case number, and if necessary any conditions imposed. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |
| 08/21/2015 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | SUBJECT: Commercial Parking Lot Development Package Engineering 3rd Resubmittal Review ADDRESS: 537 N 6th Av PARCELS: 117-04-230E, 117-04-230D, 117-04-2330, & 117-04-2390 (lot 4) FLOODPLAIN STATUS: X-shaded 500-yr and X-unshaded zones, 040076-2276L REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, PE CASE NUMBER: DP15-0069 (formerly DP14-0174) SUMMARY: The development package was submitted for 3rd review for the proposed Parking Lot improvements for parcels 117-04-230E 117-04-230D 117-04-2330 117-04-2390 (lot 4), but now excludes 117-04-2440 (lot 7), and 117-04-2430 (lot 7). PDSD Engineering Division does not recommend approval until the remaining comments are addressed for next submittal. MASTER COVER SHEETS/ GENERAL NOTES: 1) >>COMPLETED<< 2) >>COMPLETED<< BASE LAYER SHEET COMMENTS: 3) >>COMPLETED<< SITE PLAN SHEET COMMENTS: 4) >>COMPLETED<< 5) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.9.H.2: Revise layout for western portion of project to meet SVT requirements. Label sight visibility triangles dimensions on Ferro Av. 6) >>COMPLETED<< 7) >>COMPLETED<< DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS: No further drainage report comments. LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS: No comments at this time. GRADING, PAVING, DETAIL SHEET COMMENTS: 8) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.9.T, Tech Man Sec.8-01.5.3.C: Show how area behind refuse wall allows for drainage around enclosure. UTILITIES / EASEMENTS COMMENTS: No comments at this time. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN COMMENTS: Not applicable since total area of all parcels is less than 1 acre. SOILS/GEOTECHNICAL REPORT COMMENTS: No comments at this time. For resubmittal package, provide 2 copies of revised Development Package sheets, and response letter. If you have questions or need to arrange for the meeting, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department City of Tucson |
| 08/25/2015 | FDILLON1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Denied | Design Package still awaiting comments from Design Professional and PDSD Director approval. FD |
| 08/25/2015 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP15-0069 - ADA review 537 N 6th Avenue Redevelopment of the Tucson Blue Site to Multi-Use (IID) TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 25, 2015 COMMENTS: The PDSD Plans Reviewer Ron Brown reviewed these plans for ADA and provided comments on the last review. Ron Brown has been on Medical Leave for a few months and it is not clear when he may return. For now the ADA review will be done by Zoning with the assistance of the Building Official. Comment 01. After reviewing Ron's previous comments and revised the DP, the plans have been revised to address Ron's comments. One item that needs to be addressed is the landing at the end of the ramp on the down slope direction. Revise the landing at the bottom of the ramp to have a distance of six feet in the north and south direction. Comment 02. Clearly draw and label the Screen on the DP plan sheets, and the locations of the doors as shown on the west elevation. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised Site Plan and Elevation Drawings |
| 08/25/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 08/26/2015 | BVIESTE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) 2-rolled sets of the plans 2) All items required by review staff 3) All items needed to approve the plans |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/02/2015 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |