Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP15-0016
Parcel: 11713061N

Address:
198 S GRANADA AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP15-0016
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/04/2015 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed
02/10/2015 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: GJX Administration Building
Development Package (1st Review)
DP15-0016

TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 13, 2015

DUE DATE: March 4, 2015

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

1. COMMENT: As it appears that parcels 117-13-061N & 117-13-069D work in conjunction, work as one site, with parcel 117-13-061P this development package should include all three parcels. That said based on the proposed new building this is a full code review due to a building expansion of greater than 25% for UDC Sections 7.4 & 7.5 and TSM Section 7 for the entire site. If the proposed project is for parcels 117-13-061N & 117-13-069D only full code compliance is required for the entire site. Some type of separation between parcels 117-13-061N & 117-13-069D and parcel 117-13-061P is required. Clarify what is proposed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is February 2, 2016.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.1.1 PURPOSE
This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews.

The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property.

This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes.

2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY
This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review.

2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided.
The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application:

2-06.2.1 Application Form
A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee;

2-06.2.2 Development Package
A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein;

2-06.2.3 Related Reviews
In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the;

2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews
The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and,

2-06.2.5 Fees
Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.9 - The plan drawing shall be oriented with north toward the top of the sheet. If it is not practical to orient north to the top of the sheet, the plan drawing shall be oriented with north to the left side of the sheet.

2. COMMENT: The drawings have north oriented to the right, revised the drawings to have north either toward the top of the sheet or to the left.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

3. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP15-0016, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

4. COMMENT: As this project is located within the Rio Nuevo District (RND) and/or the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District (IID) and it appears that you will be requesting relief from UDC development criteria, once you have determined what process you will use, RND, IID, Board of Adjustment, etc, provide the applicable case number(s) adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

2-06.4.2.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and,

5. COMMENT: Identify the Santa Cruz river on the location map.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage.

6. COMMENT: Until comment 1 has been addressed the proposed site area cannot be verified.

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

7. COMMENT: Remove the reference to "4.9.4R" from "PERMITTIN NOTE 2" as it is not applicable.

2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan.

2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any.

8. COMMENT: Provide a general note as required above stating the type of application that has been processed, see comment 3.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building;

9. COMMENT: Provide the floor area for all buildings on site, see comment 1.

2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included; and,

10. COMMENT: Until comment 1 has been addressed the requirements for an expansion calculation cannot be verified.

2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met.

11. COMMENT: See comment 1 above.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system.

12. COMMENT: Provide the site boundary perimeter information including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, for all parcels that are part of this site, see comment 1.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

13. COMMENT: There is a portion of the right-of-way along Granada Avenue that is zoned R-2. Show the R-2 zoned area on the plan and clearly define the zoning boundaries.

2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

14. COMMENT: There is a retaining wall called out under keynote 4 shown near the southwest corner of the proposed building that appears to run along the proposed 20' access lane. Clarify the height and extend of this retaining wall. If the retaining wall is over six (6) inches in height along the access lane a two (2) foot setback is required between the retaining wall and the access lane, see UDC Section 7.4.6.F.2.b.

15. COMMENT: Per UDC Section 7.4.6.H.1 Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. That said some type of barrier is required;
Along both sides of the proposed "CHIP SEAL DRIVEWAY" called out under keynote 24.
Along the east side of the vehicle parking area called out as "GJX NEW ADMIN. BUIDLING PARKING"
Along the southern end of the property west of the proposed trash enclosure.
Along the west side of the parking area.

16. COMMENT: Provide a fully dimensioned vehicle parking area, see comment 1.

17. COMMENT: There are several parking area access lanes (PAALs) that don't meet the minimum width for 90 degree parking, see UDC Table 7.4.6-1. A Parking Design Modification Request (PDMR) must be approved prior to approval of this development package.

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

18. COMMENT: Provide a standard vehicle parking space detail.

19. COMMENT: Provide a location dimension for the wheel stops shown at the accessible vehicle parking spaces, see UDC Section 7.4.6.H.3.

20. COMMENT: There are numerous vehicle parking spaces shown on the plan that do not meet the minimum size of 8.5' x 18', see UDC Figure 7.4.6-A. A Parking Design Modification Request (PDMR) must be approved prior to approval of this development package.

2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

21. COMMENT: Either provide the required long term bicycle parking on the plan or a Board of Adjustment for Variance or approval through IID, DRB or MDR is required prior to approval of development package.

22. COMMENT: Demonstrate on the plan that the short term bicycle parking meets the requirements of UDC Sections 7.4.9.B.1.e and 7.4.9.C.2.a.

2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval.

23. COMMENT: Provide the recordation information for the "FUTURE 25' PUBLIC UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT" on the plan.

2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

24. COMMENT: Until the building height is provided the required street perimeter yard set cannot be verified. Zoning recommends that building elevations be provided.

2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

25. COMMENT: Provide the height for the proposed building within the footprint on the plan.

26. COMMENT: Provide the square footage and the height for the existing building within the footprint on the plan.

2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

27. COMMENT: Per TSM Section 7-01.3.3.B Within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation path is required as follows: The areas within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas, and all other common use areas. That said show the required sidewalk to the dumpster area.

28. COMMENT: Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.B A sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to any access lane or PAAL on the side where buildings are located. That said provide a sidewalk along the north side of the proposed building.

29. COMMENT: Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.C A sidewalk is required adjacent to any parking space accessed by a PAAL where the space is located on the same side of the PAAL as any building and no other parking spaces or PAALs intervene. That said provide a sidewalk along the west side of the proposed building.


2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

30. COMMENT: If applicable show any proposed signs on the plan along with a note "TO BE PERMITTED UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
02/18/2015 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change General Requirements

Where the IID and Rio Nuevo and Downtown (RND) overlay zones overlap, applicants may select either the provisions of the IID or the RND Modification of Development Requirements, but not both.

UDC 5.12. DOWNTOWN AREA INFILL INCENTIVE DISTRICT (IID)

Revise the plans as necessary to conform with the IID requirements, as applicable.

5.11.5. Rio Nuevo District SITE DESIGN STANDARDS

1) UDC 5.11.5.A.2. Shade
"Shade shall be provided for at least 50% of all sidewalks and pedestrian pathways as measured at 2:00 p.m. on June 21 when the sun is 82 degrees above the horizon (based on 32°N Latitude). Shade may be provided by arcades, canopies, or shade structures, provided they respect the historic and design context of the street and the architectural integrity of the building." This requirement applies along the entire street frontage of the site.

2) UDC 5.11.5.A.3.b(3) Screening of Parking
"All new parking shall be designed so that vehicles are not visible from the adjoining street level, through incorporation of pedestrian arcades, occupied space, or display space." Revise to provide screening for the entirety of the parking lot, including access lanes.

3) UDC 5.11.5.B.1. Plazas and Pedestrian Nodes
"Five percent of the gross floor area of new construction shall be provided in public plazas or courtyards." Provide a calculation for this requirement on the site plan and identify any related improvements on the plans.

4) UDC 5.11.5.C.3.a. "Adequate lighting shall be provided for safety and visibility at night. Project plans shall include illumination levels and color rendition of exterior building lighting adjacent to sidewalks and alleys."

Miscellaneous

5) Keynote 10 on the site plan indicates existing parking. Is there an approved parking plan for this area? Note previous case numbers as applicable. UDC 7.4.3.E

UDC 4.11. Is it a previous Temporary Use Parking area. Revise note as applicable.

UDC 7.4. Is it a new permanent parking area, revise plans as necessary to meet applicable codes.

6) UDC 7.6.6.E An irrigation plan must be submitted together with the landscape plan

7) TSM 4-01.3.A Submit a Rainwater Harvesting Plan.

8) A ten foot wide street landscape border and screening is required along the street, except as modified by RND or IID. UDC Table 7.4.4-1.
02/18/2015 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Approved
02/23/2015 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Reqs Change SHEET C3.0
1. As per the 2012 IBC, Section 1106.7, one accessible passenger loading space must be provided for every 100' of regular passenger loading load length.
a. Accessible passenger loading zones are to be as per the 2009 ICC A117.1, Section 503.
SHEET C6.0
2. At details 2 and 3 (ramps within the property boundaries) delete all reference to COT DTL 207. This is for right of way accessible construction and is not appliable for private private projects.
a. Detectable warnings are required at transportation platforms only and may be omitted.
SHEET C6.1
3. At detail 11, provide a width dimension.
END OF REVIEW
02/23/2015 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: February 24, 2015
DUE DATE: March 04, 2015
SUBJECT: GJX Administration Building Development Plan Package- Engineering Review
TO: Grenier Engineering, Inc.; Attn: Richard Macias, PE
LOCATION: 198 S Granada Ave
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP15-0016

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the following link for further clarification:
http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

The following items need to be addressed:

SITE PLAN:

1) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: The relevant Development Plan Package case number (DP15-0016) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets

2) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: Revise the development plan package to provide the applicable case number(s) adjacent to the title block on each sheet for any of the overlays the project is proposing to use; i.e. RND, IID, and/or Board of Adjustment

3) AM Sec.2-06.4.4.B: Revise the development plan package to identify the regional watercourse (Santa Cruz River) within the square mile area.

4) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.A: Revise the development plan package to provide the site boundary perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, together with distances in feet for all parcels that are part of this project.

5) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.F: Revise the development plan package to label all existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site with the Improvement Plan Number in plan view.

6) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan package to label the required minimum 25-foot radii at all driveway entrances per TSM Sec.10-01.3.2.C and Figure 6. The proposed development plan currently calls out 18-foot returns which do not meet the minimum standard. If smaller curb returns are proposed a Technical Standard Modification Request (TSMR) will be required. It is recommended to contact TDOT Permits and Codes prior to submitting the TSMR to verify if they will accept the design.

7) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a Revise the development plan package to label the required vehicular separation around the proposed chip seal driveway (KN #24) and the existing parking spaces along the east side of the parcel. Per UDC Sec.7.4.6.H.1 Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site.

8) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the height of the proposed retaining wall (KN#4) adjacent to the new 20-foot access lane south of the new building. Per UDC Sec.7.4.6.F.2.b if the retaining wall is over 6-inches in height a 2-foot setback is required between the retaining wall and the access lane.

9) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a Revise the development plan package to provide a fully dimensioned vehicular use area for the entire site. Per the dimensions on the plan it appears that for the existing parking spaces and PAALs there are areas that do not meet the minimum widths per UDC Table 7.4.6-1. A Parking Design Modification Request (PDMR) application must be provided and approved prior to approval of the development plan package.

10) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a Revise the development plan package to provide a standard vehicle parking space detail. Verify on the detail the required 2.5 foot overhang for spaces adjacent to sidewalks, landscape areas, wall, proposed riprap swale, etc. Refer to UDC Figure 7.4.6-C for the 2.5 foot overhang dimension.

11) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.L: Revise the development plan package to provide the recordation information for the future 25-foot public utility & drainage easement as shown on the plan set. If the easement is for future right-of-way projects that are not part of this permit then it may be applicable to leave it off the development plan package at this time.

12) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Provide a copy of the Geotechnical Engineering Investigation prepared by Western Technology (Project # 2925XH001) as stated in General Note # 2 on Sheet 2C1.1 for review for the proposed earthwork and pavement design recommendations.

13) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.1: Revise the development plan package and Keynote #9 to clearly label and dimension the proposed curb openings per Detail 6 on Sheet C6.0. All curb openings should have the dimension labeled in plan view to ensure construction. A

14) M Sec.2-06.4.9.N.1: Revise the development plan package and Detail #9 to correctly reference the rip rap detail. Currently the detail calls out Detail #11; however it appears that it should be Detail #8.

15) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.1: Revise the development plan package, Sheet C4.0 and Keynote #6 to provide a concrete valley gutter for the parking lot drainage to ensure the 0.5 % slope through the parking lot and to the drainage outlet.

16) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project.

17) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan package to provide a pedestrian access path to all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas, and all other common use areas. Per TSM 7-01.3.3.B the areas within the development which must be connected specifically verify how the pedestrian access is connected to the proposed refuse containers.

18) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan package and Section #14 to provide a pedestrian access path adjacent to the building and vehicular use areas along the north side of the proposed building. Per TSM Sec.7-01.4.1.B a sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to any access lane or PAAL on the side where buildings are located.

19) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan package and Section #17 to provide a sidewalk adjacent to the west side of the proposed building and the existing parking spaces. Per TSM Sec.7-01.4.1.C a sidewalk is required adjacent to any parking space accessed by a PAAL where the space is located on the same side of the PAAL as any building and no other parking spaces or PAALs intervene.

20) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the required 4-foot sidewalk widths for all areas of the pedestrian access per TSM Sec.7-01.4.3.A. Specifically the area adjacent to the northeast side of the building and adjacent to the handicap parking spaces.

21) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.S: Revise the development plan package and associated details for the proposed handicap access ramps within the right-of-way. Since the ramps are located in the public right-of-way they must meet the minimum requirements of PC/COT Standard Detail for Public Improvement #207. Clarify why the details are calling out the IBC.

22) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.S: Revise the development plan package and associated details to label and dimension the minimum 6-foot sidewalk width for the existing and/or new sidewalk along Granada Ave. Per the details it appears that there are areas that are less than 6-feet which would require a TSMR to reduce it to the dimensioned width. It is recommended to contact TDOT Permits and Codes prior to submitting the TSMR to verify if they will accept the design

23) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.T: Revise the development plan package to provide for centralized onsite solid waste and recycle collection service pick up per TSM Sec.8-01.5.1.A. Provide specific details on the development plan package for construction purposes. The details must match TSM Sec.8-01, Figure 2 and Figure 3a for the required double enclosure walls with gates, concrete thickness and compressive strength, concrete approach apron dimensions, space from wall to bollards, anchoring bolts, 14'x40' clear approach for each container, etc. Specifically the proposed site plan only shows 1 refuse container location and includes a note on Sheet C1.0 that 1-95 gallon APC will be used for Recycling. Verify if a secondary recycling location is required or provided approval through ES for the use of APC container and proposed method of collection.

SWPPP:

24) Provide the bound and signed SWPPP report as stated in the SWPPP Notes #3 for review and approval by the City of Tucson. Verify the SWPPP meets the minimum requirements of the AzPDES 2013 Construction General Permit (CGP).

DRAINAGE STATEMENT:

25) TSM Sec.4-04.2.3.2.D: Provide a Drainage Statement with a discussion for all existing and proposed drainage infrastructure. The discussion should address the pre and post imperviousness, scuppers, valley gutter, rip rap swale, etc. Verify that all points of discharge located at pedestrian access points contain the 10-year flow.

GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Plan Package, Drainage Statement and SWPPP that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
02/23/2015 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Reqs Change Submit a Native Plant Preservation Plan or Request for Exception. UDC 7.7.3
02/23/2015 FDILLON1 DESIGN EXAMINER REVIEW Denied This project requires Design Review. FD - 2-23-15
02/25/2015 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
02/25/2015 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER WRITE DECISION LETTER Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items:

1) Two rolled sets of the plans
2) All items requested by review staff
3) All items needed to approve these plans

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
02/26/2015 AROMERO4 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed