Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP14-0218
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/25/2014 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/01/2014 | CHRIS POIRIER | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | 201 N. STONE AV, 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 MICHELENE NOWAKADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 724-9512 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: MICHELENE NOWAK, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: DP14-0218 STURGEON ELECTRIC- 1ST REVIEW DATE: NOVEMBER 26, 2014 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1.Label Project# DP14-0218 on all Sheets.2.On Title Block on all Sheets add legal description: Portion of Lot 132 Los Ranchitos Number 3 Book 7 of Maps & Plats at Page 76 located in the . . . . 3.On Sheet 1 correct Bk & Pg of Plat to the east, west and north of property to: Bk 7, Pg 76 |
| 12/05/2014 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Proposed building is too far from existing fire hydrant. Please refer to section 507.5 of the 2012 International Fire Code. Please indicate new fire hydrant or intent to install fire sprinklers. |
| 12/08/2014 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP14-0218 Address: 2825 E. Ginter Road Development Package: Commercial Storage and Administrative Office Uses TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 11, 2014 DUE DATE: December 24, 2014 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 15, 2015. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.1 - Each sheet shall measure 24 inches by 36 inches and include a minimum one inch margin on left side and one-half inch margin on all other sides to facilitate efficient record keeping. A larger sheet format may be used with the approval of the Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD). 2-06.3.2 - All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than 50 feet to the inch. This scale is the minimum accepted to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for record-keeping purposes. The same scale shall be used for all sheets within the set. Smaller scales (60:1 or greater) may be used for some or all of the sheets with the prior approval of PDSD when it is determined legibility and the ability to be digitized and/or reduced for archiving will not be affected. 2-06.3.3 - All lettering and text (upper or lower case), and numbering, shall be a minimum of three-thirty-seconds inches in height to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for archiving. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 01. COMMENT: List the Architects email address on the cover sheet. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 02. COMMENT: This project has been assigned the PDSD DP case number DP14-0218. List the case number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 03. COMMENT: Clarify if the development on this site includes two separate Principal uses. If so provide the zoning information related to the Zoning data, vehicle, bicycle, loading zones requirements for each use. If the storage is the principal use and the office is the accessory use, indicate as so by note(s). ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 03. COMMENT: This site is within the TIA AEZ overlay area. Draw and label the AEZ height lines, list the MSL elevation of the runway that affects this site, label the MS elevation of the site and include a calculation of the overall height of the building and the difference between the allowed and actual building height as it relates to the AEZ. See UDC Article 5 section 5.6.11. List on the cover sheet a General Note stating the site is designed to comply with the AEZ regulations in Article 5 section 5.6. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included; and, 04. COMMENT: Include as a general note the building area expansion calculation. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.7.E.1.a - The following notes will be placed on all plans/plats. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 05. COMMENT: If applicable to this property, add the requested information as noted by the standard above. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 06. COMMENT: Draw and label the existing sight visibility triangles. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. 07. COMMENT: If concrete sidewalks are required along the street frontage of the side, ensure that a connection from the onsite sidewalk is made to the street sidewalk. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 08. COMMENT: Until it is clear how the buildings function between the two uses the parking requirements cannot be completely verified. Is the Storage use an accessory use to the Administrative Office use or vice versa? This does make a difference in the number of vehicle and bicycle parking spaces required. Add the information related to the typical parking spaces. Label the Accessible parking spaces. Additional comments may be forthcoming on this item based on the response. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 09. COMMENT: Provide the information as noted by the standard above. Commercial Storage does require a minimum of 2 Long Term Bicycle parking spaces. Revise the bicycle parking calculations. Provide the dimensioned details for the short and long term facilities and draw and label the bicycle parking facilities on the site plan sheet(s). ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan 2-06.4.9.M.1 - A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan. 2-06.4.9.M.2 - Concurrent Review. For all projects, grading plans may be included in the development package and will be reviewed concurrently. 10. COMMENT: The Grading Plan sheet will be approved as part of the DP is approval. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 11. COMMENT: Label the building dimension in order to verify the proposed and existing building square footages. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 12. COMMENT: Draw, label and dimension the width of the man-gate next the east side of the existing building. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 13. COMMENT: If a sidewalk along the street frontage is required by TDOT or PDSD Engineering, ensure that the onsite sidewalk and street sidewalk connection is made. (The sidewalk is drawn up to the property line as of this review.) ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 14. COMMENT: Add a general note stating the type of or location for mail boxes. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 15. COMMENT: I did not see any freestanding signage drawn on the site plan. (If applicable draw and label the location of the signs.) ****************************************************************************************** If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents. |
| 12/16/2014 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | SHEET 3 OF 7 1. Detectable warnings are required at transportation platforms only. They may be omitted for this project. 2. For all ramps: a. Provide down directional arrows. b. Provide a large scale detail of each kind of ramp and show all accessible requiremnts such as dimensioning, ramp slopes, grade differientation, landings and width. SHEET 5 OF 7 3. Show all ramp down directional arrows and slope percentages. 4. Add a couple more sidewalk down slope arrows and percentages. 5. Reference comment 1 above. END OF REVIEW |
| 12/18/2014 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Buildings 10,000 Square Feet or Less On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building(s) is 10,000 square feet or less, expansions in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area as follows. a. If the expansion is less than 50%, the standards of this section apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning standards in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval. b. If the expansion is 50% or greater or if expansions as of February 15, 1991, cumulatively result in a 50% or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, the standards of this section apply to the entire site. Provide expansion calculation. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ARTICLE 7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING Provide previous approved site and landscape plans for reference. If no plans exist then this submittal will become the document of record. Provide the following information if necessary: Location, size, and name of all the existing vegetation to remain in place on site. Continuous screens along street frontages for outdoor storage is determined by Table 7.6.4-I. Provide appropriate 6' screening for storage area. Indicate future and existing sight visibility triangles on landscape plan Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
| 12/18/2014 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/19/2014 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The drainage statement references South Wilmot Road several times. Revise the statement to clearly apply to this project. 2. Provide estimates of the cut and fill quantities. Account for the area excavated for the new depressed storage area. |
| 12/24/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 12/24/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | WRITE DECISION LETTER | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve this plan |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/20/2015 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |