Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP14-0191
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/16/2014 | CPIERCE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/16/2014 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 10/22/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Approved | See documents in PRO |
| 10/28/2014 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Surf Thru Car Wash - 51 S. Pantano Road Development Package (1st Review) DP14-0191 & C9-04-12 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 29, 2014 DUE DATE: November 14, 2014 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 15, 2015. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.1.1 PURPOSE This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. 2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review. 2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided. The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application: 2-06.2.1 Application Form A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee; 2-06.2.2 Development Package A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein; 2-06.2.3 Related Reviews In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the; 2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and, 2-06.2.5 Fees Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 1. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP14-0191, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2. COMMENT: Provide the rezoning case number, C9-14-12, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 3. COMMENT: There appears to be an issue with the address for this site. Oreilly Auto Parts located on the parcel to the south is already using 51 S. Pantano. Contact Pima County Addressing. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.3 - If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet. 4. COMMENT: Once finalized provide the rezoning conditions on the plan. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 5. COMMENT: Provide a copy of the recorded "EXISTING DRIVEWAY SEE DKT. 10957, PG 1826" with the next submittal. 6. COMMENT: The "ELECTRICAL EASEMENT TO BE RELEASEED" will need to be abandoned prior to approval of this development package. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 7. COMMENT: Per UDC Section 7.4.6.F.2.b Access lanes and PAALs must be setback at least two feet from a wall, screen, or other obstruction over six inches. That said provide the required 2' setback from property line and the access lane that runs along the north property line just south of the existing Circle K. 8. COMMENT: Provide an access lane width dimension for the one-way access lane shown to the east of the proposed building. 9. COMMENT: Provide an access lane width dimension for the one-way access lanes shown adjacent to the concrete median called out under Keynote 31. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 10. COMMENT: Per UDC Section 7.4.6.H.1 Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. That said Keynote 12 calls out for new wheel stops to be placed on vehicle parking spaces located on the property to north. These wheel stops need to placed so that vehicles will not overhang the property line. See UDC Section 7.4.6.H.3 for location requirements. 11. COMMENT: As changes are proposed on the property to north, removal of vehicle parking spaces and a loading zone, a separate development package is required show the changes and provide the applicable calculations. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 12. COMMENT: Per UDC Section 7.4.9.B.1.e Outdoor bicycle parking areas must be lighted so that they are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings during hours of use. That said demonstrate how this requirement is met. 13. COMMENT: Provide a detail for the long term bicycle parking that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Section 7.4.9.D are met. 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. 14. COMMENT: As a new access lane is proposed straddling the south property line some type of recorded access agreement or easement is required. Provide the recordation information on the plan. 15. COMMENT: As a new access lane is proposed near the northeast corner of the site some type of recorded access agreement or easement is required. Provide the recordation information on the plan. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 16. COMMENT: As perimeter yard setback requirements are based on Proposed Use adjacent to Zone the "EAST" perimeter yard shown under General Note 14 is not correct. Per UDC Table 6.3-4.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE C-1, C-2, C-3, OCR-1, & OCR-2 ZONES, Nonres Use to Nonres Zone the required perimeter yard is 0. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 17. COMMENT: Provide the height of the proposed "NEW 1 STORY BUILIDNG" within the footprint of the building 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 18. COMMENT: Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.B A sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to any access lane or PAAL on the side where buildings are located. That said provide a sidewalk along the entire south side of the proposed building. 19. COMMENT: Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.B A sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to any access lane or PAAL on the side where buildings are located. That said provide a sidewalk along the south side of the existing Circle K. 20. COMMENT: Clarify why there is a striped pedestrian refuge area shown along a portion of the south side of the building. Is there vehicle access to the building, if not this area is required to be a sidewalk. 21. COMMENT: Provide a sidewalk width dimension from the proposed accessible ramp, shown near the northeast corner of the proposed building, to the 2'-6" vehicle overhang. Per TSM 7-01.4.3.A a minimum 4'-0" clear is required. 22. COMMENT: It appears that the proposed short term bicycle parking location will encroaches into the minimum sidewalk width for the 5' sidewalk shown just to the east. Provide a width dimension on detail "I" sheet 5 that shows a minimum 4'-0" clear, see TSM 7-01.4.3.A. 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 23. COMMENT: Until the rezoning conditions are provided the requirements of this section cannot be verified. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package . |
| 10/28/2014 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Please indicate location of existing and/or proposed fire hydrants, with dimensions to property lines. Refer to section 507 of the 2012 International Fire Code for spacing requirements. |
| 10/29/2014 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 PO Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#284160 October 27, 2014 Cypress Civil Development Attn: K. Hall 2102 N. Country Club Rd. Suite 9 Tucson, AZ 85716 Dear Mr. Hall: SUBJECT: Surf Thru Car Wash DP14-0191 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted October 22, 2014. It appears that there are conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. " OH Lines may need to be undergrounded. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (OH204) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Chuck Leon at (520) 917-8707. Sincerely, Jeffery Shea Admin Support Specialist Design/Build cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) C. Leon, Tucson Electric Power |
| 10/30/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | See Letter in PRO |
| 11/04/2014 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | These comments are preliminary and may be modified or additional comments may be forthcoming once the rezoning conditions have been finalized. Make sure that all rezoning conditions are addressed in subsequent submittals. Check the curb radii as labeled throughout the plan. Make sure they are correct. Note that PAAL intersections must have a minimum radius of 5 feet. UDC 7.4.6.E.1.a. Show recordation for cross access easements. Also provide copies of agreements allowing development on adjacent properties. The proposed driveway configuration doesn't meet the dimensional requirements of the Transportation Access Management Standards and Technical Standards Manual (e.g. 10-01.3.2.C) Permission from the transportation director and TSMR will be required. |
| 11/10/2014 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | November 10, 2014 ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP14-0191 PROJECT NAME: SURF THRU CAR WASH PROJECT ADDRESS: 51 S Pantano Road PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT Resubmittal Required: TDOT does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plan. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 1. The City Code Sec. 25-39 requires a minimum driveway separation of 20' for curb cuts or driveways. The northern driveway seems to be less than this requirement,. Therefore the driveway needs to be modified. 2. At the intersections of streets with other streets or collector or arterial streets with PAALs/driveways, the curb lines will be connected with a curve having the minimum 25 feet radius. Technical Standards manual 10-01.3.2 3. New signs such as Do Not Enter should not be placed within the public Right of Way. Not to be maintained by the City of Tucson. 4. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-4259 for permit information. 5. The access points shall have 25' radius curb returns. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6) If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-6659 or Zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/12/2014 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Relocate both accessible parking spaces to a position in the parking design that has the shortest route to the accessible entrance as per the 2012 IBC, Section 1106.6 a. Please define the accessible entrance/s. 2. As per the 2009 ICC A117.1, Section 406, a minimum 3'-0" landing must be provided at the top of the ramp. Zoning requires 4'-0". This clearance must be from the auto overhang and not the edge of the concrete. 3. Provide a concrete wheel stop at each accessible parking space or relocate the accessible parking sign to a position where the auto overhang can not hit and damage the sign. 4. Detectable warning strips are required only at transportation platforms. Their inclusion on this project is strictly an owner option. a. Accessible requirements in the public right of way is as per COT DOT. END OF REVIEW |
| 11/12/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | I have no issues with this request. >>> DSD_CDRC 10/16/2014 3:12 PM >>> Dear Reviewers: This is an electronic distribution for a Rezoning review and CDRC Development Plan review. If you are receiving this e-mail, you should review for both reviews listed above. If you normally receive paper copies of the review documents, you will receive them soon. The applicable case numbers are: REZONING: C9-14-12 CDRC Development Plan: DP14-0191 Existing and Proposed Zoning: C-1 to C-2 Proposed Use: Ca Wash Due Date: November 12, 2014 Electronic Documents may be found at the following link: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO/Command?mode=permit&firstTime=true&number_key=DP14-0191&command=InitialProcess&SearchButton=Search |
| 11/13/2014 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Rezoning case; Subdivision case; Board of Adjustment case; Design Development Option case; Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or, Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Until the rezoning review and conditions are provided the requirements of these sections(s) cannot be verified. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |
| 11/13/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 11/13/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Reqs Change | The Development Package has been reviewed on behalf of Environmental Services and the following will need to be addressed on the resubmittal: 1. Clearly show solid waste truck maneuverability for access to the solid waste enclosures. The maneuverability must be shown on the plans from the street to the collection service location and back to the street. (TS 8-01.5.3.E). Use the turning templates provided in TSM Section 8. 2. The service vehicle must approach in-line with the enclosure. Demonstrate the ability to do this on the plans. It appears the PAAL will may need to be widened beyond the 40 ft. clear area in order to allow the vehicle to make the turn and be in line with the enclosure for servicing. If there are any questions, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net |
| 11/14/2014 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Until the rezoning review and conditions are provided the requirements of these sections(s) cannot be verified. |
| 11/17/2014 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 11/17/2014 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all the items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approved these plans |
| 11/17/2014 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Passed | |
| 11/17/2014 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 11/17/2014 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No existing or planned Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, ASLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Fax: (520) 791-4008 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/17/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | see documents in PRO |
| 11/17/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | CENTURYLINK | Passed | |
| 11/17/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 11/17/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Passed | |
| 11/17/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/15/2014 | AROMERO4 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |