Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP14-0145
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/15/2014 | SPOWELL1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/15/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Approved | Thank you Ken! Greatly appreciate you reviewing this right away for us. Regards, Lisa Bowers Tucson Expediting & Development 520-990-6866 88 W. Cushing St Tucson, AZ 85701 www.metroTED.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. From: Ken Perry [mailto:kperry@perryengineering.net] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2014 1:41 PM To: 'Jason Morse'; 'Lisa Bowers'; 'Chris Leighton' Cc: 'Patricia Gehlen' Subject: RE: The Hub II - Development Package 4th Submittal This looks good to ESD. Thanks Jason, Ken |
| 10/15/2014 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: The HUB at Tucson Phase II Development Package (3rd Review) DP14-0145 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 9, 2014 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: The Zoning Review Section conditionally approves the development package for this project subject to the following conditions: 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 1. COMMENT: There are a couple of easements shown to be abandoned. These easements will need to be abandoned prior to approval of the development package. 2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. 2. COMMENT: As this site is comprised of two (2) parcel a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combo Request form with your next submittal. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 3. COMMENT: There appears to be some type of awning shown near the north end of the east side of the proposed structure, provide the height of this structure on the plan. It also appears that this awning encroaches into the right-of-way along Tyndall Avenue, a temporary revocable easement is required. Contact COT Real Estate Office. A hold has been put on permit T14CM06286 building certificate of occupancy 4. Zoning has put a hold on permit T14CM06286 building certificate of occupancy until the above conditions have been met. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP14.0145 |
| 10/16/2014 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | |
| 10/16/2014 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | I see my comments as clarifications to (not additions) to the previous comments. Please leave as is, since the existing refers to Hub II and previous refers to Hub I, I believe the City promised the adjacent land owners that the Development would fix the paving they incorrectly placed the alley, in order to provide positive drainage, I just wanted to make sure it was clear to all. >>> Patricia Gehlen 10/15/2014 3:20 PM >>> Steve- When Zelin posted his conditional comments they were seen as final by the developer. The plans for approval are in my office. NOw is not the time to change the wording. I will ask them to add the work "previous" if you want it but it really is not fair to change the wording more than that at this time. Trish >>> Estevan Tineo 10/15/2014 2:58 PM >>> I worded both comments into one, I hope it makes sense. In order to provide positive drainage to the existing alley drainage structure, Alley pavement to be reconstructed to existing grades and cross section, after building construction is complete. This includes reconstructing recently paved portion of the alley to previous as-built inverted section and grade. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/16/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 10/16/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/16/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |