Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP14-0140
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/18/2014 | CPIERCE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/19/2014 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP14-0140 3601 E. Broadway Boulevard Development Package - Marshalls, Lot 14 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 19, 2014 DUE DATE: September 2, 2014 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is August 18, 2015. 2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. 01. COMMENT: The index on the cover sheet must be corrected to reflect that actual number of sheets in the package. The pagination in the title block must also be corrected to reflect the actual number of sheets in the package. 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). 02. COMMENT: See related comment 1. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route. Provide as a note the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, whether the loading space is a Type A or B as provided in UDC Section 7.5.4. 03. COMMENT: Demonstrate maneuverability into and out of the loading dock area. 2-06.4.9.M.1 - A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan. 04. COMMENT: The grading plan has been reviewed concurrently with the DP site plan by zoning. Once the DP site plan is approved the grading plan is also approved. However any changes that are necessary to the site plan sheets must also be made to the grading plan and landscape sheets. Zoning will review the DP site, grading and landscape sheets for consistency on the next review. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 05. COMMENT: If applicable indicate the location of any proposed freestanding monument signs for this development. 2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. 06. COMMENT: See the landscape reviewer comment related to landscaping requirements. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents. |
| 08/19/2014 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 08/21/2014 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | 201 N. STONE AV, 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 ROBIN FREIMAN ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 724-9512 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: ROBIN FREIMAN, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR MARSHALLS, 3541 E BROADWAY BL, 1ST REVIEW DATE: 08/21/14 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1. Correct all Title Blocks on all sheets to read: "DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR MARSHALLS A PORTION OF LOT 14 - EL CON MALL FINAL PLAT 3541 E BROADWAY BL…" 2. Legal Description, Sheet 1: Please revise to "A PORTION OF LOT 14…" 3. General Notes, Sheet 1, #5: Please fill in Development Plan Case Number DP14-0140. 4. Lower right hand corner of all sheets: Please fill in Development Plan Case Number DP14-0140. |
| 08/22/2014 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Correct pagination in sheet index and on each sheet to reflect a total of 17 sheets. 2. Clearly show maneuverability to all loading zones and solid waste container locations. |
| 08/22/2014 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 PO Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#281580 August 22, 2014 Optimus Civil Design Group Attn: J. Behrana 4650 E. Cotton Center Blvd Suite 200 Phoenix, AZ 85040 Dear Mr. Behrana: SUBJECT: Marshall's at El Con DP14-0140 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted August 21, 2014. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (OH204) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244. Sincerely, Jeffery Shea Admin Support Specialist Design/Build cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 08/25/2014 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Insure slopes of all new accessible routes comply with the 2009 ICC A117.1, Section 403.3; 5% maximum running slope and 2% maximum cross slope. Please add a new note to that effect. 2. At the Amphitheater and the bermed amphitheater shaded seating areas, insure accessibility as per the 2012 IBC, Sections 1108, 1109.15 and the 2009 ICC A117.1, Section 1108. END OF REVIEW |
| 08/26/2014 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 08/27/2014 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
| 08/28/2014 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 08/29/2014 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/02/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 09/02/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Reqs Change | The DP has been reviewed on behalf of Environmental Services. Please address the following comment: General Notes 24 and 25 on the cover sheet state the existing dumpsters will be placed in enclosures and that the enclosures for the compactors and dumpsters shall meet the requirements of Condition No. VI.e. Please verify the proposed Marshalls will use the existing compactor and recycling container to the south of the Century Theatres, or identify their locations if different. Also, please provide details of the proposed enclosures for the recycling and the refuse. Condition VI.e states the containers shall be screened by a minimum 8 ft. high masonry wall or by buildings. If there are any questions, I can be contacted at kperry@perryengineering.net |
| 09/02/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Reqs Change | Patricia, I did not see a compactor for the Marshalls on the plans, and mistook a general note that the project was going to use the existing enclosures for trash. I talked with Jeff this morning about it and told him I would take a look. This is DP14-0140. Jeff, I took a quick look at the plans. I apologize for missing the compactor. You will need to address some items on the revised plans: 1. Like Engineering mentions, show the truck accessibility route to the compactor. You show it for the loading space, however the compactor service truck is not allowed to back that far, only 80 ft. It will need to be able to turn around near the compactor and back in. Show the truck route per the templates in TSM Section 8. 2. Per TSM Section 8.01.5.2.I, the compactor units need to be screened from the adjacent properties, and allow space for the recycling container(s). Your plans say to see the Architect’s plans for the details. Please include the architect’s enclosure plans with the resubmittal. The enclosure needs to have a gate at the entrance as well. The details should also show the concrete thickness, reinforcement, etc. and similar construction components as the Figures in TSM Section 8. The enclosures must also meet Condition VI.e and have walls 8 ft. tall. 3. In the compactor detail, demonstrate the compactor’s enclosure meets the minimum clearances as described in TSM 8.01-5.2.J. 4. If the compactor enclosure is not sufficient to house the recycling container, show where the recycling container will be located. If separate from the compactor, it will require its own enclosure per the Figures in TSM Section 8. Revise General Note 25 to state refuse service will be provided by roll off compactor and recycling service will be by metal container, if that is the case, and state where the recycling container will be located. 5. The compactor and roll off need minimum 25 ft. clearance. Does the proposed Marshall’s building have any overhangs with would encroach into this vertical clearance? Let me know if you have any questions, Ken Ken Perry, PE, LEED AP Principal 505 W. Wetmore Road Tucson, Arizona 85705 Office 520.620.9870, ext. 1 Cell 520.820.4355 kperry@perryengineering.net www.perryengineering.net CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This E-mail and any attachments are private and are intended only for the use of the addressee, and may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, distribution, or copying of this E-mail and/or the attachments is strictly prohibited." |
| 09/03/2014 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve this plan |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/24/2014 | AROMERO4 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 09/24/2014 | AROMERO4 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/24/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |