Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP14-0064
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/28/2014 | CPIERCE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/28/2014 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Passed | |
| 04/28/2014 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV, 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 MICHELENE NOWAK ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 724-9512 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: MICHELENE NOWAK, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: DP14-0064 BROADWAY FESTIVAL /DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1ST REVIEW DATE: The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1. Label project # DP14-0064 on all Sheets. 2. On Location Map correct street name to: Chantilly Drive |
| 04/28/2014 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/29/2014 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and supports its acceptance. Thank you -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. . |
| 04/29/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | See letter in SIRE |
| 04/29/2014 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | Based on square footage, building 1 has an occupant load of 290 and building 2 (food service portion) has an occupant load of 200. A-2 occupancies with an occupant load of 100 or more require fire sprinklers. No fire service lines are indicated on the plans. Please resolve, clarify with information on DP plan. |
| 04/30/2014 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP14-0064 5601 E. Broadway Blvd. Development Package for Broadway Festival TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 1, 2014 DUE DATE: May 22, 2014 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is . 2. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section: 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.1.1 PURPOSE This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. 2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review. 2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided. The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application: 2-06.2.1 Application Form A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee; 2-06.2.2 Development Package A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein; 2-06.2.3 Related Reviews In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the; 2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and, 2-06.2.5 Fees: Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.10 - A legend that shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing is to be provided, preferably on the first sheet. 01. Comment: The Fire Hydrant symbol listed in the legend on sheet 2 does not match the symbol used on the site sheets (Site and LS sheets). Include a symbol in the legend that represents the street signs depicted on the site sheets. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 02. COMMENT: Clarify if the developer is also the owner of the property. If so, revise the contact info for the Owner/Developer, if there is a separate owner list the required information for the owner as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 03. COMMENT: List the following case numbers in the lower right corner of all plan sheets, the PDSD D.P. case number DP14-0064 and Rezoning case number C9-14-03. 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 2-06.4.2.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 04. COMMENT: Label the section corners on the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.1 - List as a general note: "Existing zoning is ____." 05. COMMENT: Under the General Notes text block, list as a general note the existing zoning of the property. 2-06.4.7.A.3 - If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet. 06. COMMENT: Under the General Notes text block, under the existing zoning note, list as a general note the information as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 07. COMMENT: Broadway Boulevard is listed as an arterial street/gateway corridor zone on the Major Streets and Routes Map. Under the General Notes text block, add a note that states the site has been designed to comply with the requirements of the MS&R UDC section 5.4 and Gateway Corridor Zone UDC section 5.5. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 08. COMMENT: If applicable, add the information as listed by the standard above. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 09. COMMENT: Label the curb to property line dimensions for all streets that abut the subject property. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. 10. COMMENT: Revise the zoning classification of R-3 to C-1 per the second sentence as noted in the standard above. List the zoning classification C-1 for the parcels across Broadway Blvd. 2-06.4.9.H - Proposed Traffic Circulation 2-06.4.9.H.1 - Proposed traffic circulation will be designed in accordance with Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual, to include streets, intersections, street names, right-of-way widths, curve radii of centerlines and curb returns, and proposed improvements, such as pavement, curbs, access points (driveways), accessible ramps, and sidewalks. Street improvements, such as sidewalks, curbs, pavement, and accessible ramps, do not need to be drawn on the plan if such information is provided on typical street cross sections. Please be aware that, if a new street is created (for other than for subdivisions) which divides the property into two or more lots, a subdivision plat is required (refer to the definition of subdivision in Section 11.4.20 of the UDC). 11. COMMENT: Dimension the drive lanes at the pork chop entrance location. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 12. COMMENT: The future curb location along Broadway will be 12 feet from the property line. The curb to PL was not labeled on the site plan and so it is not clear if the SVT is drawn in the correct location. Label the curb to PL dimension and address this comment as required. If TDOT or PDSD Engineering requires curbs to be constructed along the Leonora Avenue and 10th Street frontages, adjust the SVT's and label the distance of from the curb to PL on both streets. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 13. COMMENT: Address the following comments a. and b. related to the standard as noted above. a. Dimension the width of the drive -through lanes for building one (1), also dimension the width of the drive-through lane along the east side of building two (2). b. Dimension the width of the Park/Wait space adjacent to the south side of building one. Dimension the width of the lane between the Park/Wait space and the landscape curbing. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 14: COMMENT: Address the following comments a. - d. related to the standard as noted above. a. A back-up spur is required at the end of a row parking (west End of the north parking area). The drawing depicts a future drive connection to the development along the west boundary. Unless this is likely to occur remove the note. Provide a back-up spur to comply with UDC section 7.4.6.F.4.a-.c and / figure 7.4.6-B. b. Dimension the overhang areas where the parking spaces are not provided (Landscape and Water Harvesting locations) with wheel stops or provide wheel stops. Dimension the vehicle overhang at the two (2) HC parking locations. c. Annotate and dimension the area adjacent to the southwest corner of building two (2) and next to the stacking space labeled as number 10. The space /area is not annotated and a keynote was not provided except for what appears to be a circle-1 which may indicate a parking space. d. Dimension the width of the two (2) parking spaces that are placed next to the dumpster enclosures. (There must be a minimum clearance of two (2) feet from the edge of the parking space to the enclosure wall or the parking space must be 10 feet wide, UDC section 7.4.6.D.2.b. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route. Provide as a note the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, whether the loading space is a Type A or B as provided in UDC Section 7.5.4. 15. COMMENT: Demonstrate maneuverability into and out of the loading zone. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 16. COMMENT: The long term bicycle parking locations are too far from either building and do not appear to be in areas that are safe from traffic or otherwise. a. The Long term facility for building one (1) should be moved and relocated closer to the building. Demonstrate how overhead lighting is to be provided. b. The location of the long term facility for building two (2) should also be relocated closer to the building. The location as shown on the plan places the lockers in area behind an enclosure and between landscaping that would make the lockers unsafe. Demonstrate how the overhead lighting will be provided. 2-06.4.9.I - Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development package documents have been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes. Projects bounded by streets having only a portion of the right-of-way width dedicated will be required to dedicate right-of-way, up to one-half, to complete the street width. Should there be any proposed street or alley vacation, provide this information. If vacation has occurred, include the recording information. 17. COMMENT: I believe that the Broadway right of way is at is maximum width but if there is a rezoning condition that requires additional right of way to be dedicated, revise the plan to reflect the new alignment. 2-06.4.9.J - If Street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) 18. COMMENT: As mentioned in a comment above, the future Broadway curb to property line dimension must be added to the site plan. The width of the sidewalk along Broadway must also be dimensioned. If TDOT or PDSD Engineering require new curbs along the Leonora and 10th streets include the curb to property line dimensions. 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. 19. COMMENT: If there is a proposal to provide access to the Westside development, a cross access agreement will have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the site plan and a copy of the document provided prior to approval of the development package. 2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan 20. COMMENT: A grading plan was not included in the development package. A separate DP will be required for the grading plan. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 21. COMMENT: Label the overall building setback (both buildings) from the Broadway Blvd. future back of curb location. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 22. Comment: Label the width of the sidewalks connecting the onsite pedestrian path to the Broadway Blvd. and Leonora Street sidewalk. The minimum width requirement is four (4) feet. 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 23. COMMENT: TDOT or PDSD Engineering may require a sidewalk along the 10th St. right of way. If so, draw, label and dimension the sidewalk. 2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm. 24. COMMENT: The dumpster enclosures do not appear to be wide enough to provide for both a trash and recycle container. The width of the enclosure for two full size containers may impact the design of the parking areas. Check with Environmental Service's Ken Perry for this requirement. If the double enclosure is required by ES, revise the site plan sheets accordingly. 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 25. COMMENT: This plan has been reviewed by Zoning for compliance with UDC and Technical Standards regulations. The north portion of the site is being reviewed concurrently for a rezoning from R-3 to C-1. As of this review there are no rezoning conditions that can be applied to this project. Therefore as the rezoning process develops and preliminary conditions are drawn up by staff, the site plan drawing may have to be revised to include any conditions of rezoning. List the conditions of rezoning, date of authorization, and provide a copy of the conditions of rezoning with the next submittal of the development package. Include a separate response letter stating how all rezoning conditions have been addressed. Additional comments related to rezoning conditions may be forthcoming on the next review of the development package. 2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 26. COMMENT: If applicable, draw and label the location of gang Mailboxes. If gang mailboxes are not proposed include a general note stating how mail is to be delivered, to each suite etc. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 27. COMMENT: Draw and label the location of any proposed free standing monument signage. Label the size and type of sign. 2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. 28. COMMENT: See the Landscape reviewer comments related to requirements for screening and landscape borders. 29. COMMENT: Review the redline markings on the development package sheets and address or revise as required. Return the "redlines" copy of this development package with your next DP submittal. 30. COMMENT: Be aware that additional comments may be forthcoming based on the revisions to the development package plan sheets and requirements of the rezoning conditions. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents. |
| 05/01/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Approved | See documents in SIRE |
| 05/01/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | I have no issues with this request. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept. 1100 S. Alvernon Tucson, AZ 85711 520-837-7428 |
| 05/09/2014 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | SHEET C2 1. At detail 1: a. Revise the accessible parking to be exactly as that shown on sheet C3. b. Show the flared sides curb ramp at the accessible aisle and show the 3' deep landing clearances as required by ICC A117.1, Section 406.7. SHEET C3 2. The ramp on the east side of the marked crossing to Lenora Avenue is not code compliant as per the 2009 ICC A117.1, section 406. If flared sides on the curb ramp are to be used, please provide a 1:10 Maximum slope. If they are not to be used then provide a return curb on both side of the curb ramp. 3. Reference all the accessible parking layouts to the large scale detail shown on sheet C2. END OF REVIEW |
| 05/09/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Revise the site drawing to include the following existing utility information: a. The size of the sanitary sewers and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number. b. The proposed points of connection to existing public sewers. c. Any existing or proposed utility easements d. The first floor elevations for the buildings Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.13, IBC 2012. |
| 05/09/2014 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#277031 May 8, 2014 KBP Architecture Attn: Kevin Petrick 11635 E. Tanque Verde Rd. Tucson, Arizona 85749 Dear Mr. Petrick: SUBJECT: Broadway Festival DP14-0064 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted May 5, 2014. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Chuck Leon at (520) 917-8707. Sincerely, Jeffery Shea Admin Support Specialist Design/Build Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) C. Leon, Tucson Electric Power |
| 05/13/2014 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The development package cannot be approved until the rezoning conditions have been approved. Make all necessary changes to comply with the adopted conditions. Additional comments may be forthcoming. 2. Curb or other physical separation from the adjacent travel lane is required. Show the curb or other physical separation on the plan. TSM 1-01.3.3.D.5 3. The new sidewalk along Leonora Avenue must be at least 5 feet wide. Provide dimensions on the plans. TSM 10-01.4.1.A.1.a 4. Show correct SVTs and include the intersection of Leonora Avenue and Broadway Boulevard and the intersection of the PAAL on the adjacent property with Broadway. 5. Provide sufficient dimensions on the plan to demonstrate compliance with dimensional standards. Include curb radii, aisle widths, planter dimensions, pedestrian path widths and any other significant dimension. 6. Delineate approximate areas of water harvesting and show sufficient grade information to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed water harvesting. 7. Grading information is not included in this plan set and grading review was not included in the fees. Provide, at least in the response letter but preferably on the plan sheets, approximate cut and fill quantities and extent of water harvesting areas. If a grading permit is required, an additional submittal and review fees will be required. |
| 05/19/2014 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | SUBJECT: Broadway Festival @ 5601 E Broadway Boulevard DP14-0064 Rezoning Case C9-14-03 TDOT Review PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola, TDOT Permit Center The Preliminary Development Plan is acceptable; however a traffic study is required to adequately determine neighborhood impacts, and recommendations. A traffic count should be performed as a baseline for future reference. The following rezoning conditions are recommended by TDOT: 1. The installation of standard 6' width sidewalks and standard wheelchair ramps along Broadway Boulevard. 2. The installation of standard curb and sidewalk and wheelchair ramps along Leonora Avenue frontage. 3. The closure of all existing driveways that are proposed to be removed. Curb openings will be closed with new curb and sidewalks. 4. Chip Seal Leonora from Broadway to 10th Street. 5. Developer will be responsible for neighborhood traffic mitigation if traffic volume increases after opening year of development. |
| 05/21/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Reqs Change | See documents in SIRE |
| 05/22/2014 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1) Submit a Rainwater Harvesting Plan. TSM 4-01.3 2) Provide dimensions for all landscape areas. Revise the tree planters in and adjacent to the vehicular use areas to meet the minimum size requirements. UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a.3 3) Provide details for screen wall design in accordance with the conditions of rezoning. C9-14-03 4) Submit an Irrigation Plan. UDC 7.6.6.E.3 |
| 05/22/2014 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT DP-14-0064 Broadway - Festival () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: C9-14-03 Ina Group - Broadway NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Sewell-Hudlow Neighborhood Plan and Plan Tucson GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: YES COMMENTS DUE BY: May 21, 2014 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan X) Other Reviewer: msp DATE: 05/21/14 Planning and Development Services Department Community Planning Section DP14 0064 - Broadway/Festival May 21, 2014 Based on the applicant's request; a concurrent review is under way for both Development Plan DP14-0064, a retail/restaurant project and Rezoning Case C9-14-031, Ina Group-Broadway, to change the land use zone from C-1 and R-3 to C-1, to allow the site to be redeveloped for retail and restaurant land use with drive-through lane(s). Prior to the approval of the proposed development plan DP14-0064; rezoning case C9-14-03 must be approved by Mayor and Council. Development plan DP14-0064 shall be designed to be in full compliance with C9-14-03 rezoning conditions. Staff offers the following comments: 1. Prior to development plan resubmittal, the proposed development plan shall be in full compliance with rezoning case C9-14-03, as approved by Mayor and Council. 2. Prior to development plan approval, general notes to include all C9-14-03, rezoning conditions, verbatim, as approved by Mayor and Council. |
| 05/22/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Reqs Change | The Development Package has been reviewed on behalf of ES. Please address the following on the next submittal: 1. The use of APCs for recycling is not allowed for this commercial project per TSM Section 8-01.4.0.G. Please provide a metal container with an enclosure for recycling. Because the two uses are on one parcel, only one refuse and one recycle container inside enclosures is required. 2. Please demonstrate there is adequate truck access and maneuverability in the vicinity of the westerly enclosure. The service vehicle needs to approach the enclosure in an in- line position. See the details and turning templates in TSM 8-01. The landscape island to the east of the loading space may prevent adequate access to this enclosure. 3. The clear space for entry to a waste enclosure requires a 14' x 40' area in front of the enclosure for each container. The space required for a two container enclosure is therefore 28' x 40'. See TSM 8-01.5.3.B. Please show this area outlined on the plan. 4. The detail for the enclosure on Sheet C.2 will need to be revised to call out or show adequate spacing between bollards and walls, gate construction, concrete reinforcement, etc. per Figures 3A and/or 3B in TSM Section 8. 5. Grading information is not provided on the plan. Please show grades and slopes to demonstrate compliance with the sloping requirements within and away from the enclosures per the figures in TSM Section 8. 6. Per TSM 8-01.4.B, add the general note specifying anticipated method of collection and frequency. If there are questions, I can be reached if there are questions at kperry@perryengineering.net. |
| 05/27/2014 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk that contains all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve this plan. |
| 05/27/2014 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 05/27/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 05/27/2014 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/27/2014 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Passed | |
| 05/27/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 05/27/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | CENTURYLINK | Passed | |
| 05/27/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/25/2015 | AROMERO4 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |