Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP13-0248
Parcel: 141113850

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP13-0248
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/03/2014 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied Please indicate location of new and/or proposed fire hydrants. Refer to the 2012 International Fire Code, Section 507 for spacing requirements.
01/10/2014 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
01/10/2014 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Michael St Paul
Planning Technician

PROJECT: DP13-0248
9105 East Camino Abril
Industrial (no specific use)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 9, 2014

DUE DATE: January 15, 2014


COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code, The Administrative and Technical Manuals were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is December 19, 2014.

2. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.1.1 PURPOSE
This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews.

The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property.

This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes.

2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY
This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review.

2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided.
The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application:

2-06.2.1 Application Form
A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee;

2-06.2.2 Development Package
A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein;

2-06.2.3 Related Reviews
In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the;

2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews
The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and,

2-06.2.5 Fees
Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule.

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines.

1) COMMENT: Provide the email address for all of the above provided on the coversheet.

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

2) COMMENT: Have all the sheet numbers as one set. The Landscape plans need to be number as part of the whole set.

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

3) COMMENT: Place the Development Package number (DP13-0248) and the existing subdivision number (S99-049) and the Annexation case number (C9-84-84) adjacent to the title block on each sheet. Also remove "Road" from the address. The correct address is just 9105 E Camino Abril.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

4) COMMENT: Retail is among the "Prohibited Land Uses" in the ADC-2 overlay zone (UDC Section 5.6.8.B.2.g). Remove Retail as a proposed use from the plan. You only provided a Use Group (Industrial Use Group) on the cover sheet for the vehicular use parking calculation. You must provide a specific use, within the Industrial Use Group, for both the proposed use and the parking calculations. Under the Industrial Use Group add a note that states: "Hazardous Material Manufacturing is a Prohibited Use" (UDC Section 5.6.8.B.2.b(1) ).

2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan.

5) COMMENT: This site is located in the Airport Environs Zone, Approach Departure Corridors (ADC-2) for Davis-Monthan Air Force Base (DMAFB) overlay (DC Sections 5.6.2 & 5.6.8). State the following performance standards for the ADC-2 overlay (UDC Section 5.6.8.B.1.a & .c):

"No more than 20 employees per acre of the site area at any time may be accommodated by intention, design, or in fact." This site is stated as 0.54 acres, which is thereby limited to 10 employees at any one time on the entire site.

"The maximum FAR is .30 of the project site area."

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building;

6) COMMENT: Provide the floor-area ratio (FAR) in the General notes on the Cover Sheet.

2-06.4.7.C - Streets and Roads Notes

2-06.4.7.C.2 - List the following note on all development package documents: "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual."

7) COMMENT: Add the previous note to the General Notes.

2-06.4.7.E - Wastewater Management Notes
List the following notes as appropriate.

8) COMMENT: See comments from Wastewater Management.

2-06.4.7.E.4 - The following note will be provided if public and private sewers are proposed for construction or if public sewers are existing: "On-site sanitary sewers, except public sewers within public sewer easements or rights-of-way, will be private and will be constructed, operated, and maintained on a private basis. The location and method of connection to an existing public sanitary sewer is subject to review and approval by the Pima County Wastewater Management Department at the time of submittal of plumbing or building plans."

9) COMMENT: See comments from the County Wastewater Management Department.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability.

10) COMMENT: See Fire comments.

2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

11) COMMENT: The parking calculations do not match the plan. The parking calculations are also inconsistent with the ADC-2 employee limitations (UDC Section 5.6.8.B.1.a). Revise the parking calculations (UDC Table 7.4.4-1).

2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route. Provide as a note the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, whether the loading space is a Type A or B as provided in UDC Section 7.5.4.

12) COMMENT: None required.

2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

13) COMMENT: The minimum long-term bicycle parking requirement of two (2) shall be for each unit (UDC Table 7.4.8-1), if the long-term bicycle parking is to be inside. Revise the calculation on the cover sheet to reflect the actual parking and Detail 9 on Sheet 4.

2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval.

14) COMMENT: Delineate and dimension any proposed easements.

2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan

2-06.4.9.M.1 - A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan.

15) COMMENT: The grading plan appears to match the site plans. See Engineering comments.

2-06.4.9.P - The following Pima County Wastewater Management information will be indicated on the development package documents.

16) COMMENT: See comments from Pima County Wastewater Management.

2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

17) COMMENT: Depict sign locations as described above. Signs are a separate permitting process.

2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required, in accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements.

18) COMMENT: See Landscaping comments.



If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Michael St. Paul, (520) 837-4959.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents.

Provide two copies of the revised development package.
01/13/2014 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Reqs Change SHEET 1
1. At note 13, revise to read that all accessibile parking is to be as required by by the 2012 IBC, Chapter 11 and the 2009 ICC A117.1.
a. All signage to be as per the same requirements plus PDSD standards.
2. At notd 24 revise to read that all accessible routes are to comply with the 2009 ICC A117.1, Section 403.3 slope requirements of 5% maximum running slope and 2% maximum cross slopes.
SHEET 2
3. At note 23, revise to read "as per ICC A117.1, Section 405. Reference detail 3/4".
4. At note 1, add the code reference stated in comment 2 above.
SHEET 4
5. At detail 3:
a. Show all ramps and directional arrows
b. Show all dimensions
c. Show maximum 2% grade slope in all directions for the accessible parking space and accessible aisle.
END OF REVIEW
01/14/2014 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS

Identification and Descriptive Data

All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.

Additional comments may apply
01/15/2014 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
01/16/2014 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied 1. Provide an enclosure for both solid waste and recycling containers. TSM 8-01.5.1.A
2. General note 21 indicates the site will be graded to direct all runoff toward water harvesting areas. The grading plan and hydrology/hydraulic report do not reflect this. Revise the plans to be consistent.
3. Label the existing contours and indicate the contour interval on the plans. The existing spot elevations and the contours don't seem to correlate with each other. Please check.
12/20/2013 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/21/2014 SHANAE POWELL OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed