Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP13-0230
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/04/2014 | AROMERO4 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/08/2014 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Passed | Approved during first review. |
| 04/08/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Approved | first review was informational only |
| 04/14/2014 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP13-030 9675 E Broadway Boulevard Development Package for Expansion of A-Family Storage TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 14, 2014 DUE DATE: May 2, 2014 COMMENTS: Zoning is conditionally approving the DP subject to including in the next submittal of the DP, the color renderings as requested by the previous comment 24 noted now as comment 01. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 01. Follow-up Comment to previous comment 24: The requested color renderings were not included with the current submittal of the DP. Submit copies of the renderings with the next submittal. 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. PREVIOUS COMMENT 24: Provide a separate response letter explaining how rezoning conditions have been indentified and met based on the proposed Development Package Site Plan. Provide additional documents as needed to demonstrate compliance with rezoning conditions specific to building requirements. Re-zoning condition 9 requires that exterior mechanical equipment be screened from view from the surrounding properties and streets. If any mechanical equipment is proposed on the new site and is visible from the surrounding properties and streets, a detail or detail drawings will have to be added to the plan detailing how the equipment will be screened. The screening must be architecturally compatible with the proposed development. Re-zoning condition 10 requires incorporating one (1) or more visually appealing design treatments for screen walls adjacent to public streets. Per the plans, the south elevation (wall) of building one (1) will serve as the screening. Provide color renderings of building one to verify that compliance with this condition can be met. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. |
| 04/24/2014 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 04/24/2014, SUBJECT: Expansion of A-Family Self Storage DP13-0230, T14S, R15E, SECTION 11 RECEIVED: Development Plan Package and Drainage Report on April 04, 2014 The Drainage Report is acceptable and it is hereby approved. The Development Package is recommended for conditional approval subject to revising the retention basin bleed pipe detail to show a cap at the pipe inlet with a two or three inch opening. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4933 or Laith.Alshami@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan Package |
| 04/24/2014 | LAITH ALSHAMI | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Reqs Change | The Development Package has been reviewed and is denied. Please address the following on the resubmittal: 1. The size of the expansion of the site requires the full code compliance for the entire site. Therefore, the addition of a metal recycling container and enclosure is required in addition to the existing single refuse container enclosure. Please revise the plans to address previous comments 1-3. 2. Move the note regarding the anticipated method of collection and frequency from the detail on Sheet 4 to the general notes on the cover sheet. If there are any questions, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net |
| 04/28/2014 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV, 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 MICHELENE NOWAK ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 721-9512 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: MICHELENE NOWAK, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: DP13-0230 A-FAMILY SELF STORAGE EXPANSION/2ND REVIEW DATE: APRIL 28, 2014 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. 1.) Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar or bond paper of approved Development Plan to City Planning. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files and can be emailed to CADsubmittals@pima.gov The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
| 04/29/2014 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. At detail 8/4 provide detectable warning strips at both ends of the marked crossing as per ICC A117.1, Sections 406.12, 13 and 14 as applicable. END OF REVIEW |
| 05/01/2014 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 05/02/2014 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/05/2014 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve this plan |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/05/2014 | GERARDO BONILLA | REJECT SHELF | Completed |