Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - DP13-0228
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/02/2013 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Master Grading & Paving Plan - Bridges Block 14 Grading Plan (1st Review) DP13-0228 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 02, 2013 DUE DATE: December 09, 2013 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.3.9 - The plan drawing shall be oriented with north toward the top of the sheet. If it is not practical to orient north to the top of the sheet, the plan drawing shall be oriented with north to the left side of the sheet. COMMENT: Sheet G-3 has the plan oriented with north to the right, revise so that north is to the left. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised Grading Plan |
| 12/04/2013 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Jeff Behrana, P.E. Optimus, Clint Glass P.E., CMG Drainage SUBJECT: DP13-0228 Master Plan Block 14 Development Package 1st submittal Engineering Review ADDRESS: 3070 S CAMPBELL AV, Ward 5 LOCATION: T14S R14E Section 30 FLOODPLAIN: FEMA zone X-unshaded, 2287 & 2279 L WATERSHED: 18th Street Wash Above 36th Street Watershed CL BASIN: non-designated basin management area REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, P.E. SUMMARY: Engineering has reviewed and provided comments to the Master Plan for Bridges Block 14 Development Package sheets. Engineering does not recommend approval at this time. Please note, additional comments are incorporated in Culvers Development Package review DP13-0227. Additional comments may be forthcoming for this project. Prior to resubmittal, address following comments. MASTER COVER SHEETS/ GENERAL NOTES/GRADING/SITE SHEETS COMMENTS: 1) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.9: Address the following grading related comments: a) Tech Man Sec. 2-01.8.1: Further comments may be forth coming regarding the following proposed improvements: i) It appears from plans, that the fill within northern undeveloped portion of Block 14, is not warranted other than for containment of drainage, and perhaps stockpiling. Unless authorized under PAD, the proposed fill indicates a height that exceeds 2-ft and will require differential grading paperwork and processing if located within 100-ft of parcels that have residential use. ii) Dimension and label distance on base plan between proposed fill on northern portion of block 14 and parcels east of Campbell. iii) Remove (second) note 27 at center of sheet G-1 from plans. Standard erosion protection (reseeding or gravel is expected) or the area outside of drainage improvements should remain natural until developed. iv) Revise note 27 on left side of sheet G-1 to add geotech/soils engineer's name, report reference. b) Admin Man Sec. 2-03.4.2.F: Provide copy of soils report showing recommended grades for slope stability, pavement structural section recommendations, and other recommendations for the project. c) Labeled cover material (reseed or gravel) for all disturbed areas on grading sheets or as general note. d) Label section call-out for 1/G-4 on sheet G-3. e) Show any proposed staging area on northern portion of Block 14 for Culver's parcel for grading construction staging; show grading limits for staging area. f) Provide note specifically indicating total disturbance area for project on master cover sheet or grading note sheet. g) Provide 2-ft minimum setback on grading plan for downstream outlet structure. 2) Tucson Code Chapter 26, Article II: Address the following comments for sheets SWMP1 and SWMP-2. a) Consider revising silt fence detail on sheet SWMP-2 to remove washed gravel backfill as this is generally not ever used and can be constructed without this built-up material against fence. b) Provide SWPP report with sample forms including certification statements with signature lines. c) Identify and label receiving waters to location map and as a general SWPPP exhibit note. d) Revise location of construction entrance to northern Campbell Avenue entrance to minimize high-speed traffic conflicts along Kino Boulevard. e) Provide 2-ft minimum setback for labeled SWPPP disturbance limits to match grading limits. 3) Admin Man Secs.4.9.I, 2-06.4.8.C, 4.9.H.4, Tech Man Sec.10-01.5.1.A: On base and Site Plan sheets address the following comments: a) Admin Man Sec.2-02.2.3: Address the following PAD-related comments: i) Confirm whether design meets PAD requirements. ii) In resubmittal response letter (or show recordation of vacation on plans), status of vacation of Campbell ROW. b) Show relocated location of Suntran bus stop on planview sheet. c) Clarify any proposed turnbay area on planviews. Add note to state (or similar) that offsite improvements (impacting Culvers) will be constructed concurrently or prior to CofO for Culvers per PIA plan or as required by TDOT. d) Show SVT's on planview sheets with labeled dimensions based on any turn-bay requirements for project. 4) UDC 8.4.3.B.6, Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.9.N.4: Address the following drainage comments: a) Tech Man Sec.4-04.8.5.1.4: Label calculated freeboard on drainage exhibit Figure 5 sections A-A, B-B, & C-C, and on sections on Development Package detail sheets. b) Explain minimum cover requirements for pipe materials proposed for project at driveway crossing. c) Provide calculation for dissipation rip rap area for downstream structure. Label dimensions on a detail of outlet structure. d) Floodplain use permit application required to be submitted with Master plan. e) Additional drainage comments may be forthcoming after resubmittal and any design changes. 5) Address redlines and return with resubmittal. Submit revised sheets, revised drainage report, floodplain use permit application, geotechnical report, SWPP report, differential grading engineering justification letter, any supporting documentation, red lines, and comprehensive response letter. Due to specific comments for this project (disturbance area and erosion/dust control) additional comments may be forthcoming. Please call me to set up a meeting prior to resubmittal to discuss comments, or call for clarifications at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 12/09/2013 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Ensure that all Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior NPP / Landscape approval. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/22/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |