Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP13-0227
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/30/2014 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 01/30/2014 | CHRIS POIRIER | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | Conditions reviewed and approved by Patricia |
| 02/03/2014 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Culver's @ Tucson Market Place Development Package (2nd Review) DP13-0227 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 3, 2014 DUE DATE: February 13, 2014 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is November 15, 2014. 2. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 1. COMMENT: Provide the TSMR case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets, DS14-01 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 2. COMMENT: Zoning acknowledges that a Technical Standards Modification Request (TSMR) is in process. If approved provide as a general note the TSMR Number, Date of Approval, What was modified, and if applicable any conditions of approval. Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A At least one sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage, unless there is no vehicular access from a street because of a physical barrier, such as a drainageway or an unbroken security barrier (e.g., a wall or fence). The sidewalk should be located to minimize any conflict with vehicular access to the project. That said provide a sidewalk to Campbell and Duvall Vista on the plan. Additional Comments: 3. COMMENT: As access is proposed across the parcel to the north a recorded cross access agreement is required. Provide a copy of the recorded agreement with your next submittal. If necessary once a building plan has been submitted a hold can be placed on the certificate of occupancy until the recorded documents have been provided to PDSD. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package, recorded cross access agreement . |
| 02/03/2014 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | As per ICC A117.1, Section 406.14, provide detectable warning at each end of all the marked crossings. END OF REVIEW |
| 02/05/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/06/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Approved | The resubmittal of the Development Package has been reviewed on behalf of ESD and is approved. If the applicant has any questions, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net |
| 02/12/2014 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/13/2014 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Jeff Behrana, P.E. Optimus, Clint Glass P.E., CMG Drainage SUBJECT: DP13-0227 Culvers Restaurant Development Package 2nd submittal Engineering Review ADDRESS: 3070 S CAMPBELL AV, Ward 5 LOCATION: T14S R14E Section 30 FLOODPLAIN: FEMA zone X-unshaded, 2287 & 2279 L WATERSHED: 18th Street Wash Above 36th Street Watershed CL BASIN: non-designated basin management area REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, P.E. SUMMARY: Engineering has reviewed the resubmittal for the Development Package sheets for the Culvers project. Engineering does not recommend approval at this time. Please note, additional comments are incorporated in master review of Block 14. Address the remaining comments for Block 14 and Culvers before resubmittal. MASTER COVER SHEETS/ GENERAL NOTES/GRADING/SITE SHEETS COMMENTS: 1) Tucson Code Chapter 26, Article II: Address remaining SWPPP comments for DP13-0228. 2) Admin Man Secs.4.9.I, 2-06.4.8.C, 4.9.H.4, Tech Man Sec.10-01.5.1.A: Address the remaining comments: a) Clarify notes on sheet C-1, that states 'new entrance by master developer' to state (or similar) that offsite improvements (impacting Culvers) will be constructed concurrently or prior to CofO for Culvers per PIA plan or as required by TDOT. Limits of improvements note on planview on sheet SP-1 should be clarified with keynote or other notation to clarify offsite improvements are required prior to final approval of Culvers' permits. b) Clarify keynote 11 on sheet C-1 to state that sidewalk shall be the width per TDOT / code or standard requirement compliance. c) Add additional information regarding offsite dimensions of adjacent ROW on detail A-A on sheet G-1. d) Dimension structural pavement design on a detail to match or comply with minimum recommendations in geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Report. 3) UDC 8.4.3.B.6, Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.9.N.4: Dimension minimum cover on detail 5/dtl-2. Submit 2 copies of revised Dev Pkg, geotechnical report, any supporting documentation, and comprehensive response letter. Submit one diskette with all copies of documents, unless CDRC needs separate diskette. Please call me at 837-4934 to set up a meeting prior to resubmittal to discuss comments. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 02/14/2014 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All items requested by review staff 3) All items needed to approve these plans. |
| 02/14/2014 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approv-Cond | From Zelin Canchola TDOT Date: Feb 10, 2014 This plan is approved however, Six foot sidewalk will be required for the Private Improvement Agreement. New sidewalk on Kino Campbell (Arterial) shall be constructed with six (6) foot sidewalk. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/18/2014 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |