Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP13-0227
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/26/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/26/2013 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | SHEET DP1 1. At note 16, update the IBC to 2012 edition and the ICC A117.1 to the 2009 Edition SHEET SP1 2. Delete the detectable warning strips at the accessible parking aisles. Accessible parking aisles are not hazardous areas. 3. Reference all accessible design elements to the large scale details shown on sheet DTL1 SHEET DTL1 4. At detail 4: a. Delete the detectable warning strips. b. Provide the parking space depth dimension. 5. At detail 12 note the detectable warning strips are to be installed only if the ramp is part of a marked crossing. END OF REVIEW |
| 11/26/2013 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and supports its acceptance. Thank you. |
| 11/26/2013 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Culver's @ Tucson Market Place Development Package (1st Review) DP13-0227 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 20, 2013 DUE DATE: December 02, 2013 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is November 15, 2014. 2. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 1. COMMENT: Provide the following case numbers adjacent to the title block on all sheets, DP13-0227, S11-043, DP12-0113 & S12-055. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.1 - List as a general note: "Existing zoning is ____." 2. COMMENT: Revise general note 2 to include PAD 15. 2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage. 3. COMMENT: Add the square footage of the site to general note 1. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 4. COMMENT: Revise general note 15 to read "EXISTNG USE VACANT, PROPOSED USE FOOD SERVICE". 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 5. COMMENT: Revise general note 17 to include the UDC section, 5.4 for the MS& R setback zone. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 6. COMMENT: Provide the dimensioned width of the curbs and sidewalks located within adjacent right-of-ways (ROW). 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. 7. COMMENT: Show all existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project, including across any adjacent right-of-way. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 8. COMMENT: Per UDC Section 7.4.6.H.1 Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. That said provide some type of barrier where access is proposed to the parcel to the north. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 9. COMMENT: Per PAD 15 Section C.2.2.C.4.A In Sub-Areas D, E, and F, vehicle parking requirements shall be calculated according to use pursuant to UDC Section 7.4.4. That said per UDC Section 7.4.4.B, TABLE 7.4.4-1: MINIMUM NUMBER OF MOTOR VEHICLE SPACES REQUIRED, COMMERCIAL SERVICES USE GROUP, Food Service, the required vehicle parking ratio is 1 space per 100 sq. ft. GFA and outdoor seating areas. That said the VEHICULAR PARKING - SUB AREA "F", shown on sheet 2 is not correct. Based on 4,977 sq. ft the required number of vehicle parking spaces should be 50. 10. COMMENT: Sheet 2 VEHICULAR PARKING - SUB AREA "F" remove the reference to "RETAIL TRADE GROUP, 1/300 SF OR 3.33/1000 SF" as it is not correct. This should reference COMMERCIAL SERVICES USE GROUP, FOOD SERVICE, 1/100 GFA AND OUTDOOR SEATION AREAS". 11. COMMENT: Provide a detail for a standard vehicle parking space. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 12. COMMENT: Per PAD 15 Section C.2.2.C.4.A In Sub-Areas D, E, and F, bicycle parking requirements shall be calculated according to use pursuant to UDC Section 7.4.4. That said per UDC Section 7.4.8.B.2, TABLE 7.4.8-1: MINIMUM Required Bicycle Parking Spaces, COMMERCIAL SERVICES USE GROUP, Food Service, the required short-term bicycle parking ratio is 1 space per 2,000 sq. ft. GFA. Minimum requirement is 2 spaces. That said the short-term bicycle parking calculation is not correct. List the required ration as above and provide the number of short-term required in the calculation. The number of short-term required should be two (2). Based on UDC Section 7.4.9.B.2.d and the three racks shown on the site plan the short-term provide should be six (6). 13. COMMENT: Sheet 2 PARKING - BICYCLE PER UDC SECTON 7.4.8 - RETAIL TRADE GROUP remove the reference to "RETAIL TRADE GROUP, as it is not correct. This should reference COMMERCIAL SERVICES USE GROUP, FOOD SERVICE. 14. COMMENT: Sheet 2 PARKING - BICYCLE PER UDC SECTON 7.4.8 the provided long-term bicycle parking does not appear to be correct. Per detail 2 sheet 5 each unit provides two (2) long-term bicycle parking spaces. That said the number of long-term bicycle parking spaces should be four (4). 15. COMMENT: Detail 3 sheet 5 does not meet the requirements of UDC Section 7.4.9.B.2.f, the clear space between racks should be 4'-0" clear, see UDC figure 7.4.9-C. 16. COMMENT: Indicate on the plan and/or details how the requirements of UDC Section 7.4.9.B.1.e are met. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 17. COMMENT: Per TSM Section 7-01.3.3 .B Within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation path is required as follows: The areas within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas, and all other common use areas. That said provide a pedestrian circulation path to the dumpster area. 18. COMMENT: Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A At least one sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage, unless there is no vehicular access from a street because of a physical barrier, such as a drainageway or an unbroken security barrier (e.g., a wall or fence). The sidewalk should be located to minimize any conflict with vehicular access to the project. That said provide a sidewalk to Campbell and Duvall Vista on the plan. Additional Comments: 19. COMMENT: As access is proposed across the parcel to the north a recorded cross access agreement is required. Provide a copy of the recorded agreement with your next submittal. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package, recorded cross access agreement . |
| 11/26/2013 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Passed | |
| 11/26/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | POLICE | REVIEW | Approved | I have no issues with this proposal. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept 837-7428 |
| 11/26/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Approved | See letter in SIRE |
| 11/26/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | See the letter in SIRE |
| 11/26/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The rim elevation of the proposed upstream sanitary manhole (2489.60') is more than 12" lower than the first floor elevation (2491.00'). Provide justification for the installation of a backwater valve for the building sewer. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 2. An approved development plan is not to be used for construction of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to the building, building sewer, site lighting, or electrical service to the building). The construction of the on-site utilities may be included with the permit for constructing the building or as a separate permit. |
| 11/26/2013 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | MICHELENE NOWAK ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 721-9512 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: MICHELENE NOWAK, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: DP13-0227 CULVERS AT THE BRIDGES PTN BLOCK 14-1ST Review DATE: NOVEMBER 18, 2013 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. Please label project number DP13-0227 on all sheets 1.) Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar or bond paper of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Development Plan needs to be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through Pima County Addressing. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County's Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
| 11/26/2013 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 11/26/2013 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 11/26/2013 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Passed | |
| 11/27/2013 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | From: Zelin Canchola TDOT Date Nov 27, 2013 DP13-0227 Culvers 1. Please clarify timing of construction of driveway pertaining to General Note 22 (DP1 page 1 of 16): "A grading permit will be secured as part of this development plan approval". 2. A deceleration lane will be required on Kino Parkway to the driveway. This must be shown on the development plan. Clarify the resonisibility for the installation, or add to Construction note (proposrd improvements) C-1 3 of 16 Proposed deceleration lane by master developer. Refer to master grading plans under seperate permit. This will require a Private Improvement Agreement. Call 791-4259 Permits and Codes for information. 3. New Entrance Drive to Campbell by culvers should have 25 foot curb return radius. 4. Show curb return radius of 25 feet on north Driveway to Campbell (to be done by master developer) |
| 12/02/2013 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Jeff Behrana, P.E. Optimus, Clint Glass P.E., CMG Drainage SUBJECT: DP13-0227 Culvers Restaurant Development Package 1st submittal Engineering Review ADDRESS: 3070 S CAMPBELL AV, Ward 5 LOCATION: T14S R14E Section 30 FLOODPLAIN: FEMA zone X-unshaded, 2287 & 2279 L WATERSHED: 18th Street Wash Above 36th Street Watershed CL BASIN: non-designated basin management area REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, P.E. SUMMARY: Engineering has reviewed and provided comments to the Development Package sheets for the Culvers project. Engineering does not recommend approval at this time. Please note, additional comments are incorporated in master review of Block 14. Prior to resubmittal, address the comments for Block 14 and the following comments. MASTER COVER SHEETS/ GENERAL NOTES/GRADING/SITE SHEETS COMMENTS: 1) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.9: Address the following comments: a) Make sure all Development Package sheets are consecutively numbered. b) Correct labeling for blocks that appear to be switched on sheets C-1 and SP-1. c) Add as a note a reference to master plan on sheet DP-1. d) Provide and label local vertical benchmark on planview. e) Labeled cover material for all disturbed areas on grading sheets or as general note. f) Provide cross section at east side of north basin showing basin outlet, existing and proposed grades to ROW. g) Consider adding additional staging area on Culver's parcel for grading construction staging; show grading limits. h) Provide total disturbance area for Culvers Restaurant project in a general note on master cover sheet or grading note sheet. 2) Tucson Code Chapter 26, Article II: Address the following SWPP comments. a) Consider revising silt fence detail to remove washed gravel backfill as this is generally not ever used and can be constructed without this built-up material against fence. b) Provide SWPP report with sample forms including certification statements with signature lines. c) Identify and label receiving waters to location map and as a general SWPPP exhibit note. d) Revise location of construction entrance to northern Campbell Avenue entrance to minimize high-speed traffic conflicts along Kino Boulevard. 3) Admin Man Secs.4.9.I, 2-06.4.8.C, 4.9.H.4, Tech Man Sec.10-01.5.1.A: On Site Plan sheet SP-1 address the following comments: a) Show relocated location of Suntran bus stop on planview sheet SP-1. b) Clarify note that states 'new entrance by master developer' to state (or similar) that offsite improvements (impacting Culvers) will be constructed concurrently or prior to CofO for Culvers per PIA plan or as required by TDOT. c) Confirm whether design meets PAD requirements. d) Show SVT's on planview sheet SP-1 with labeled dimensions based on any turn-bay requirements for project. 4) UDC 8.4.3.B.6, Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.9.N.4: Address the following drainage comments: a) Tech Manual Secs.4-04, 4-03: Clarify basin outlet exit elevation to show positive gradient in basin system. b) Floodplain use permit application required to be submitted with Master plan. c) Additional drainage comments for adjacent drainage system provided on master plan review DP13- 0228. 5) Tech Man Sec 8-01.5: Clarify solid waste area trash enclosure detail 2 on sheet DTL-2 showing dimensions. Assure a minimum 10-ft clear between bollards and gate for solid waste pick-up area, and minimum 20-ft clear between interior side bollards. Label / clarify gate material - this material must be opaque. Submit revised sheets, geotechnical report, any supporting documentation, and comprehensive response letter. Please call me to set up a meeting prior to resubmittal to discuss comments, or call for clarifications at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 12/03/2013 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 12/03/2013 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the plans to provide a 10' wide street landscape border per UDC 7.6.4.C.2 |
| 12/03/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Here are my comments - DATE: 12/3/2013 CASE: DP13-0227 CULVERS COMMENT: No objections or adverse comments Daily PM Peak Vehicle Trip Generation: 448 37 Thanks, -Eric Additional notes: See additional information in SIRE |
| 12/03/2013 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/03/2013 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Passed | |
| 12/03/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 12/03/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | CENTURYLINK | Passed | |
| 12/03/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 12/03/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Passed | |
| 12/03/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Passed | |
| 12/03/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Reqs Change | ESD has reviewed the Development Package and offers the following comment: 1. Provide 28 ft. clear space between the curbs for 40 ft. in front of the enclosure for accessibility per TSM 8.01.5.3.B. Please show this 28' x 40' area outlined on the plan. If the applicant would like to discuss this comment, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net |
| 12/04/2013 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following the following items: 1) three rolled sets of the plans 2) a disk containing all items submitted 3) all items requested by review staff 4) all items needed to approve this plan. |
| 12/04/2013 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#270897 December 03, 2013 Optimus Civil Design Group 4650 E Cotton Center Blvd Suite 200 Tucson, Arizona 85040 Dear Optimus Civil Design Group: SUBJECT: Culvers At The Bridges Block 14 DP13-0227 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted November 20, 2013. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Our pullbox is shown on the drawings. The pull box does not appear to be in conflict. However, with the new proposed ROW, a portion of the pullbox may be on private property requiring us to need an easement. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (OH-204) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Jennifer Necas at (520) 918-8295. Sincerely, Tina Zarate Admin Support Design/Build Enclosures Cc: City of Tucson Je Necas, Tucson Electric Power |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/22/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |