Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP13-0201
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/07/2014 | CPIERCE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/12/2014 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Atlas Copco Development Package/Rezoning (2nd Review) DP13-0201 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 12, 2014 DUE DATE: June 5, 2014 Per the Non-Conforming Use Status Request dated August 23, 2013 the expansion of this non-conforming use requires full code compliance for the entire site. COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 12, 2014. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.3 - If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet. 1. COMMENT: Until the rezoning, C9-13-11, has been authorized zoning cannot approve the development package. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 2. COMMENT: Revise General Note 2 to read, "THE EXISTING ZONING IS P-I. PROPOSED ZONING IS I-1. THE ZONING FILE NUMBER IS C9-13-11. THE PROPOSED USE IS; CONSTRUCTION/HEAVY EQUIPMENT WHOLESALE AND TRADE SERVICE AND REPAIR MAJOR, SUBJECT TO USE SPECIFICE STANDARD 4.9.4.X.1 AND 4.9.13." Remove all other code reference as several are not applicable. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 3. COMMENT: The provided vehicle parking space calculation does not appear to be correct. It does not appear that the storage lockers were included in the calculation. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 4. COMMENT: Per UDC Article 7.4.3.A.1 Parking is required for every use unless otherwise specified in Section 7.4.4.B, Minimum Number of Motor Vehicle Spaces Required, or 7.4.8.B, Minimum Number of Bicycle Parking Spaces Required. You are proposing two primary uses, trade service and repair major and construction/heavy equipment wholesaling, therefore you are required to provide bicycle parking for both uses. The bicycle parking calculation is not correct. Per UDC Table 7.4.8-1 Commercial Use Group, Trade service and repair major, two (2) short term and two (2) long term bicycle parking spaces are required, Wholesaling Use Group, construction/heavy equipment wholesaling, two (2) short term and two (2) long term bicycle parking spaces are required, for a total of four (2) short term and four (4) long term. 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 5. COMMENT: Until final comments have been approved and provided on the plan zoning cannot verify compliance with conditions of rezoning. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package, copy of rezoning conditions. |
| 05/27/2014 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | SHEET 2 1. Parking Area Enlarged Plan: Provide a note for the accessible route to Campbell and the marked crossing that all slopes are to comply with ICC ANSI 117.1, Section 403.3, 5% maximum running slope and 2% maximum cross slope. 2. New Access Ramp Detail: a. Provide an arrow from the " DG SURFACE" note to the appropriate area in this detail. b. Delete the flared side of the ramp next to the DG SURFACE and provide a return curb. c. Extend the detectable warning width to the width of the ramp. d. Provide a dimensional width for the marked crossing. 3. Van Accessible Parking Stall Detail: a. Show and note the concrete patio on the Right side of the accessible parking space with a 6" high curb. b. Note 2% maximum slope in all directions for the accessible parking space and aisle. c. Show the ramp in front of the accessible parking space as indicated in the Parking Area Enlargement Plan. Indicate directional arrow and slope percentage. d. Relocate the accessible parking sign from within the building wall to a location just inside the concrete curb. e. Identify the line of the building f. Show a dimensional width of the accessible route. END OF REVIEW |
| 06/02/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | I have no issues with this request. |
| 06/03/2014 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT DP13-0201 Atlas-Copco - Campbell Avenue (X) Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: (In progress/pending - C9-13-11) Atlas-Copo - Campbell NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: General Plan and Kino Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: June 3, 2014 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: (X) Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER:msp DATE: 06/03/14 Planning and Development Services Department Community Planning Section DP13 0201 - Atlas-Copo - Campbell Avenue June 43. 2014 Based on the applicant's request; a concurrent review is under way for both Development Plan 13-0201, an industrial project and Rezoning Case C9-13-11, Atlas-Copo, to change the land use zone from PI Park Industrial to I-1 Light Industrial, to allow the site to be utilized for industrial uses that include; administrative office, sales, repair, service, and storage of mining equipment, paving equipment, and compressors. Prior to the approval of the proposed development plan DP13-0201; rezoning case C9-13-11, must be approved by Mayor and Council. As of June 3, 2014 rezoning case C9-13-11 is in progress as part of the rezoning procedures. If rezoning case C9-13-11 is approved by Mayor and Council, Development plan DP13-0201 shall be required to be in full compliance with C9-13-11. Staff offers the following comments: 1. Prior to development plan resubmittal, the proposed development plan shall be in full compliance with rezoning case C9-13-11, as approved by Mayor and Council. 2. Prior to development plan approval, add to the general notes all C9-13-11, rezoning conditions, verbatim, as approved by Mayor and Council. |
| 06/04/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Reqs Change | The DP has been reviewed on behalf of ESD. Please address these minor comments on the resubmittal: 1. On Detail B on sheet 3 pertaining to the modifications of the existing enclosure, note that the west gate (on the angled wall) shall open 180 degrees to allow service vehicle access. 2. On both enclosure details on sheet 3, note the distance of the bollards from the enclosure walls per Figure 3B of TSM Section 8. If there are any questions, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net |
| 06/05/2014 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The UDC requires continuous screens along street frontages for vehicle use areas and outdoor storage/other use areas as determined by Table 7.6.4-I. Provide appropriate screening. |
| 06/05/2014 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/09/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Reqs Change | Commnets from first review have not been addresses. |
| 06/09/2014 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve these plans. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/12/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 09/12/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/12/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |