Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP13-0201
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/21/2013 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Passed | |
| 11/04/2013 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a large scale detail of the accessible parking layout showing all accessible requirements such as dimensions, grade slopes, markings, van accessible spaces, access to accessible route, aisles, Van Accessible space, ramps as required and markings. 2. Delete the marked pedestrian walk way indicated behind the accessible parking and to the entrance road. 3. Provide an accessible route to the Campbell Av right of way pedestrian way. a. Provide all marked crossings with detectable warnings as required. b. Provide a large scale detail of the marked crossing showing all accessible requirements such as dimensions, grade slopes, markings, landings, access to accessible route and ramps as required. END OF REVIEW |
| 11/04/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Denied | Peter, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the subject development application. The Tucson Airport Authority requests the following conditions (3) of development: That development shall conform with the City of Tucson Airport Environs Zone overlay district. That the owner/developer shall record the Airport Disclosure Statement form prior to the City's approval of the development plan or building permit. The Airport Disclosure Statement discloses the existence, and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport, to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. That the owner/developer shall send one executed form set of FAA Form 7460-1, Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration, to the Manager, Air Traffic Division, FAA Regional Office. Copies of the form and electronic submittal are available at: https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp/ Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Respectfully, Jordan Feld, AICP Director of Planning & Economic Development Tucson Airport Authority jfeld@flytucson.com 520.573.5115 |
| 11/04/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | DESIGN EXAMINER | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 11/04/2013 | SPOWELL1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/04/2013 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Atlas Copco Development Package/Rezoning (1st Review) Dp13-0201 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 24, 2013 DUE DATE: November 08, 2013 Per the Non-Conforming Use Status Request dated August 23, 2013 the expansion of this non-conforming use requires full code compliance for the entire site. COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 12, 2014. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.9 - The plan drawing shall be oriented with north toward the top of the sheet. If it is not practical to orient north to the top of the sheet, the plan drawing shall be oriented with north to the left side of the sheet. 1. COMMENT: Sheet 2 of 2, NP-1, L-1, L-2, L-3& L-4 all have the plan north oriented to the right. Orient the plan north to the top or left for all sheets. 2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. 2. COMMENT: If the NPPO and landscape plans are to be submitted as part of this development package, the Sheet Index should include these sheets, i.e. the NPPO and landscape sheets. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 3. COMMENT: If the NPPO and landscape plans are to be submitted as part of this development package, provide the name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the other firm(s), that prepared development package documents on the right half of the cover sheet. 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). 4. COMMENT: If the NPPO and landscape plans are to be submitted as part of this development package, the drawing numbers should reflect the total number of sheets submitted, i.e., sheet xx of 7, on all sheets. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 5. COMMENT: Provide the administrative street address adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 6. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP13-0201, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 7. COMMENT: Provide the rezoning case number, C9-13-11, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage. 8. COMMENT: General Note 1 add the gross area of the site by square footage to the note. 2-06.4.7.A.3 - If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet. 9. COMMENT: The rezoning number shown in General Note 2 is not correct. The current rezoning number is C9-13-11. 10. COMMENT: Provide the rezoning conditions on the plan. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 11. COMMENT: General Note 2 lists the proposed use as "CONSTURCTION/HEAVY EQUIPMENT WHOLSALE. Based on the rezoning application and Non-Conforming Use Status letters dated October 12, 2012 and August 23, 2013 the propose use appears to be "HEAVY EQUIPMENT SALES", clarify what the proposed use is. Zoning will continue this review based on a use of "HEAVY EQUIPMENT SALES, SUBJECT TO USE SPECIFIC STANDARDS 4.9.9.C and 4.9.13.Q". If the use changes additional comments may be forth coming. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 12. COMMENT: Provide a General Note stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESINGED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC SECTION 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R) & UDC SECTION 5.6 AIRPORT ENVIRONS ZONE (AEZ)." 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage; 13. COMMENT: Sheet 1, CALCULATIONS, remove the reference to F.A.R. and LUC as these references are not longer applicable. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. 14. COMMENT: Remove the lot lines shown on the plan as the lots have been combined. 15. COMMENT: Remove the parcel numbers and lot designations shown on the plan as the lots have been combined. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 16. COMMENT: Sheet 2 there is a "30' PRIVATE ACCESS & DRNG. EAMT." shown along the south side of the property. Provide the recordation information for this easement. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 17. COMMENT: Provide the dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks for the adjacent right-of-ways. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. 18. COMMENT: Provide the existing zoning classifications adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 19. COMMENT: Show the future sight visibility triangles, based on the MS&R cross-section on the plan. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 20. COMMENT: Provide a fully dimensioned vehicle parking area on this plan. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 21. COMMENT: Provide a fully dimensioned vehicle parking area. 22. COMMENT: Provide a vehicle parking space calculation that includes the ratio used. Until the proposed use is verified the vehicle parking space requirements cannot be verified. If the use is vehicle sales show the break down per UDC Table 7.4.4-1 RETAIL TRADE USE GROUP, Vehicle Sales, 1 space per 400 sq. ft. GFA of show room, retail, and office area, plus 1 space per 10,000 sq. ft. of gross lot area, plus 1 space per 300 sq. ft. GFA of Automotive and Vehicle Repair use. Based on gross lot area the existing vehicle parking is well short of the required number of vehicle parking spaces. 23. COMMENT: Based on the most current aerial photo there appears to be wheel stops at all the vehicle parking spaces. Show the wheel stops on the plan or show the vehicle overhang on the plan. 24. COMMENT: Provide a typical parking space detail for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 25. COMMENT: Until the proposed use is verified the bicycle parking space requirements cannot be verified. If the use is vehicle sales the provided bicycle parking space calculation is not correct. Per UDC Table 7.4.8-1, RETAIL TRADE USE GROUP, Heavy Equipment Sales, 2 short-term and 2 long-term bicycle parking spaces are required. 26. COMMENT: Clearly shown the proposed location for the short & long term bicycle parking on the plan. 27. COMMENT: Provide a detail for both short & long term bicycle parking that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Sections 7.4.9.C, .C & .D are met. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 28. COMMENT: Sheet 2 under "EXISITNG ZONING (P-I) PERIMETER YARD SETEBACK NOTES" and "PLANNED RE-ZONING (I-1) PERIMETER YARD SETBACK NOTES" remove all references to the Land Use Code (LUC) as it is not longer applicable. 29. COMMENT: The references to street perimeter yards are not correct. As this property boarders on a street designated on the MS&R map the street perimeter yard setbacks are based on UDC Section 6.4.5.C, & UDC Table 6.4.5.C-1, ADT of 1,000 or greater. Revise the street perimeter yard requirements. 30. COMMENT: Interior perimeter yard setbacks should be based on UDC TABLE 6.3-5.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE P-1, I-2, & I-2 ZONES, Nonres Use to Nonres Zone. Revise the interior perimeter yard setbacks. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 31. COMMENT: Provide the square footage within the footprint of the building. 32. COMMENT: There is what appears to be a canopy, located near the southwest corner of the building, not shown on this plan. Show the canopy on the plan. 33. COMMENT: Based on the most current aerial photos there is what appears to be a storage shed, shown at the north end of the building. Show the shed on the plan with the square footage and the height shown within the footprint and include the square footage in all applicable calculations. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 34. COMMENT: Provide width dimensions for all sidewalks shown on the plan. 35. COMMENT: The striped area shown running behind the accessible vehicle parking space is not allowed to run between parking space and the PAAL providing access, see TSM Section 7-01.4.1.F. 36. COMMENT: The striped area shown along the west side of the building main entrance is required to be a sidewalk, physically separate from the vehicle use area, see TSM Sections 7-041.4.B & 7-01.4.2.A 37. COMMENT: Per TSM Section 7-04.4.1.D Sidewalks must connect all areas of the development and must also connect to the pedestrian circulation path located along any adjacent street. Clearly shown this connection out to Campbell Avenue. 38. COMMENT: Per TSM Section 7-04.4.1.D Sidewalks must connect all areas of the development and must also connect to the pedestrian circulation path located along any adjacent street. That said provide a sidewalk to Sears Blvd. 2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm. 39. COMMENT: Show the refuse collection area on the plan. 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 40. COMMENT: Once available indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package, copy of rezoning conditions. . |
| 11/04/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Approved | See Letter and other information in SIRE. Letter contains informational issues only. |
| 11/04/2013 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Passed | Per form |
| 11/04/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PAG - PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Here are my comments - DATE: 11/4/2013 CASE: DP13-0201 ATLAS-COPCO COMMENT: No objections or adverse comments Daily PM Peak Vehicle Trip Generation: 75 7 Thanks, -Eric Additional notes: Trips are from existing development See SIRE for additional information |
| 11/04/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | See letter in SIRE |
| 11/04/2013 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 11/04/2013 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 11/04/2013 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 11/04/2013 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 11/04/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Denied | The Development Package has been reviewed. Please address the following on the next submittal: 1. There does not appear to be any dimensions or proposed construction details for the required onsite solid waste and recycle container enclosure on the plans. Please provide a detail of the layout of the enclosure, demonstrating compliance with clearance and construction requirements as shown in TSM 8.01 Figure 3A, or add sufficient notes specifying the clearances and construction materials, spacing of bollards, gate materials, etc. 2. The recycle container needs to be a metal container and have the same 10’x10’ clear enclosure area as the solid waste container per TSM 8-01.4.G. Please show an adequate enclosure for the recycle container. 3. Please demonstrate there is adequate truck access and maneuverability in the vicinity of the enclosure. Trucks need to approach the enclosure in an in- line position. See the details and turning templates in TSM 8-01. 3. The clear space for entry to a waste enclosure requires a 14' x 40' area in front of the enclosure for each container. The space required for a two container enclosure is therefore 28' x 40'. See TSM 8-01.5.3.B. Please show this area outlined on the plan. 4. Per TSM 8-01.4.B, add the general note specifying anticipated method of collection and frequency. 5. There may be additional comments once the enclosure is shown on the resubmittal. I can be reached if there are questions at kperry@perryengineering.net. |
| 11/04/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Denied | Could I please receive the plans on lighting for this and any others that you are sending me? Thank you! (: |
| 11/05/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/05/2013 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT DP13-0201 Atlas-Copco - Campbell Avenue (X) Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: C9-13-11 Atlas-Copo - Campbell Avenue NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: General Plan and Kino Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: November 7, 2013 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: (X) Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER:msp DATE: 11/05/13 Planning and Development Services Department Community Planning Section DP13 0201 - Atlas-Copo - Campbell Avenue November 05, 2013 Based on the applicant's request; a concurrent review is under way for both Development Plan 13-0201, an industrial project and Rezoning Case C9-13-11, Atlas-Copo, to change the land use zone from PI Park Industrial to I-1 Light Industrial, to allow the site to be utilized for industrial uses that include; administrative office, sales, repair, service, and storage of mining equipment, paving equipment, and compressors. Prior to the approval of the proposed development plan DP13-0201; rezoning case C9-13-11, must be approved by Mayor and Council. Development plan DP13-0201 shall be required to be in full compliance with all of C9-13-11 approved rezoning conditions. Staff offers the following comments: 1. Prior to development plan resubmittal, the proposed development plan shall be in full compliance with rezoning case C9-13-11, as approved by Mayor and Council. 2. Prior to development plan approval, add to the general notes all C9-13-11, rezoning conditions, verbatim, as approved by Mayor and Council. |
| 11/07/2013 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Per the Non-Conforming Use Status Request dated August 23, 2013 the expansion of this non-conforming use requires full code compliance for the entire site. Submit a revised landscape plan with the following requirements: ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Rezoning case; Subdivision case; Board of Adjustment case; Design Development Option case; Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or, Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Planting Plan Vegetation Plan and Schedules Ultimate size of plants indicated by the spread of canopy, circumference of shrubs, or spread of ground cover; Both the proper and common name of each type of plant material. Material and areas of inert ground cover. Calculations Square footage of the site; Square footage of the oasis allowance area and calculation; Square footage of the vehicular use area; number of parking spaces, including the required and provided parking space calculations; and the calculation of the required number of canopy trees. Maintenance Schedule Pruning schedules to show that plant material will maintain pedestrian and vehicular clearances or that the material will establish opaque hedge screens, if required; Replacement criteria, should plant material not survive; Replacement or upkeep maintenance schedules for inert ground cover materials; Upkeep maintenance schedules for exterior hardscape materials; and, Maintenance and replacement schedules for irrigation systems. Grading Information Grade changes across the site indicated by one-foot interval contour lines or by spot elevations; Percent slope across the site and the direction of the slope of paved areas; Existing grades on adjacent rights-of-way and adjacent sites. If an adjacent right-of- way or site is under construction, show the proposed finish grade Extent of grading boundaries if a portion of the site is to be kept in its natural undisturbed state. Indicate natural contours of undisturbed areas; Areas of detention/retention, depths of basins, and percentage of side slope; The methods by which water harvesting or storm water runoff is used to benefit the planting areas on the site. Irrigation Plan Type of water conserving irrigation systems proposed and differentiation between systems for the different water use zones on the site; Source of irrigation water; Indicate potable or reclaimed water use. Reclaimed water system specifications, if used; System specifications and system design and layout (Section 4-01.4.2, Irrigation Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual); Extent of supplementary irrigation in each planting area, provided by water harvesting methods; Point of drainage off roof areas, amount of flow, and disposition of flow; Temporary systems proposed to establish native seeded areas; The length of irrigation duration (e.g., for native plat material, automatic drip for two years or until established); and, The extent to which systems are proposed within the public right-of-way. ARTICLE 7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING Fifty percent or more of the area of the street landscape border must be covered with shrubs or vegetative ground cover. The required ground coverage must be achieved within two years from the date of planting. Continuous screens along street frontages for vehicle use area must be as determined by Table 7.6.4-I. Provide appropriate screening. Within a vehicular use area, one canopy tree is required for each four motor vehicle parking spaces or fraction thereof. The canopy trees must be evenly distributed throughout the vehicular use area. Every parking space must be located within 40 feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk). Submit NPPO plan as determined by A.M. Section 2-11. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
| 11/07/2013 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | |
| 11/08/2013 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Submit NPPO plan as determined by A.M. Section 2-11. |
| 11/08/2013 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/13/2013 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 11/13/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 11/13/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | CENTURYLINK | Passed | |
| 11/13/2013 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Passed | |
| 11/13/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Passed | |
| 11/15/2013 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two copies of the rolled plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted. 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve this plan. |
| 11/15/2013 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#270558 November 14, 2013 Civil Engineer Hydrologists Attn: Patrick Marum 2730 E Broadway Blvd Tucson, Arizona 85716 Dear Mr. Marum: SUBJECT: Atlas Copco New Spain Industrial Park DP13-0201 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted October 14, 2013. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (OH-204) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Jennifer Necas at (520) 918-8295. Sincerely, Tina Zarate Admin Support Design/Build Enclosures Cc: City of Tucson Je Necas, Tucson Electric Power |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/07/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |