Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUB - SITE/GRADING ALL
Permit Number - DP13-0156
Review Name: RESUB - SITE/GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/30/2013 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Caid Industries - 6220 S. Tucson Blvd. Development Package (2nd Review) DP13-0156 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 30, 2013 DUE DATE: November 05, 2013 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is August 20, 2014. 2. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. COMMENT: Show the proposed easements as "PER SEPARATE INSTRUMENT" and zoning will put a hold on the certificate of occupancy for permit number T13CM06530 so that the development package can be approved prior to recordation of the easements. Provide the sequence numbers for all proposed easements on the plan. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. COMMENT: Zoning acknowledges that a TSMR has been applied for and it appears that the TSMR has been approved. Provide the TSMR case number date of approval, what was approved and if applicable any conditions on the plan. Once the two items above have been addressed Zoning will provide an over the counter review. Call or email to schedule this review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 10/30/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/31/2013 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/07/2013 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 11/12/13, SUBJECT: CAID Industries @ the NWC of Tucson Blvd and Ganley Road DP13-00156, T15S, R14E, SECTION 8 RECEIVED: Development Package and Drainage Report on October 24, 2013 The subject submittal has been reviewed and it can not be approved at this time. Address the following comments before review can continue. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location on the Development Package where the revisions were made: Drainage Report: The Drainage Report is acceptable and it is hereby approved. Provide a CD that includes the Drainage Report and Development Package documents. Development Package: 1. Provide, on every sheet, the approved TSMR case number (A.M. 2-06.4.3). 2. Indicate by a note to all proposed easements that they will be dedicated by a separate instrument. A hold will be put on the C of O for the proposed building until recordation date is provided for the easements (A.M.2-06.4.9.L). SWPPP: The SWPPP is acceptable. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4933 or Laith.Alshami@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/12/2013 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/14/2013 | SHANAE POWELL | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/14/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |