Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP13-0104
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/22/2013 | SPOWELL1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/26/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Denied | Project not approved. Recycle storage and service is not addressed. Jeff Drumm, P.E. Environmental Manager City of Tucson Environmental Services 520-837-3713 |
| 09/12/2013 | KBROUIL1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 09/16/2013 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS IN ALL CAPS SHEET 2 1. At the most Northerly marked crossing leading to Irvington Road: a. The crossing would be shorter and more safe if the crossing angle were more perpendicular to the PAAL and flow of traffic. THERE ARE SEVERAL ASPHALTIC PAVING AREAS THAT MAY BE REDUCED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOST WATER HARVESTERING AREA DUE TO THE EXTENSION OF THE SIDE WALK. PLEASE PROVIDE A SAFE ACCESSIBLE MARKED CROSSING BY MAKING IS STRAIGHTER AND SHORTER. b. At the south end of the marked crossing, provide a curb ramp as per 2009 ICC A117.1, Section 406.7 including flared sides. SHOW THE FLARED SIDES WITH A 1:10 SLOPE MAXIMUM. c. At the North end of the marked crossing, provide a sidewalk ramp as per 2009 ICC A117.1, Section 405.7 including required landing space. OK d. Provide dimensions for all accessible elements of the marked crossing. SHOW MORE DIMENSIONS FOR LANDING AND SIDEWALK WIDTHS. 2. At the most Southerly marked crossing leading to Midvale Park Road: a. At the most westerly end of the marked crossing, provide a sidewalk ramp as per 2009 ICC A117.1, Section 405.7 including required landing space. OK 3. Insure all accessible slopes comply with the 2009 ICC A117.1, Section 502.5, 5% maximum running slope and 2% maximum cross slopes. SHOW A NOTE ON THE DRAWINGS TO THIS EFFECT 4. Show dimensional widths of all accessible routes and marked crossings. OK SHEET 4 5. At detail 2, show grade slopes to be in compliance with ICC A117.1, Section 502.5, 2% maximum in all directions. OK END OF REVIEW |
| 09/16/2013 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Midvale Auto Spa Development Package (2nd review) DP13-0104 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 16, 2013 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) & Technical Standards Manual (TSM) were addressed. 1. This site was reviewed for full code compliance for the entire site. The following comments are based on the requirements of Administrative Manual (AM) 2-06.0. 2. The "CANOPY 15' HIGH" does not clarify if it is 15' to the top of canopy or 15 clear height from grade to bottom of canopy. Clarify. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H Per UDC Section 7.4.6.E.2 The minimum height clearance along access lanes and PAALs is 15 feet. That said provide the clearance dimension for the proposed "CANOPY" shown on the plan. 3. This comment was not addressed, elevations have not been provided for the canopies or vacuum buildings. A.M. 2-06.4.9.U The requirements of Rezoning Condition 15 have not been fully met. Provide four-sided elevations for all structures, canopies and vacuum buildings, with the next submittal. 4. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP13-0104 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. |
| 09/19/2013 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/20/2013 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Add the complete CDRC case number to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B All disturbed, grubbed, graded, or bladed areas not otherwise improved shall be landscaped, reseeded, or treated with an inorganic or organic ground cover to help reduce dust pollution. Revise landscape plan to include dust control for the future development area. LUC 3.7.2.7. DS 2-06.5.2.C Trees and shrubs are to be selected and located so that, at maturity, they do not interfere with existing on-site or off-site utility service lines or utility or other easements. Revise the landscape/NPP plans to show the limits of grading. DS 2-07.2.2.B.5 Vegetation or structures higher than thirty (30) inches must be located outside of the sight visibility triangle Submit a native plant preservation plan. LUC 3.8.4.2 Revise the page titles for accuracy. The landscape sheets should not be titled as paving and grading plans. Revise the note regarding the total shrubs and groundcovers on sheet 6 located below the plant schedule. It appears to be incorrect. |
| 09/23/2013 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) a disk containing all items submitted 3) all items requested by review staff 4) all items needed to approve this plan. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/25/2013 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/25/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |