Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP13-0093
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/24/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/24/2013 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 05/28/2013 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/31/2013 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP13-0093 Panda Express Development Package (UDC) TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 3, 2013 DUE DATE: June 10, 2013 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is May 24, 2014. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above. 2. - 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS: 3.2 - All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than fifty (50) feet to the inch. This scale is the minimum accepted to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for record-keeping purposes. The same scale shall be used for all sheets within the set. Smaller scales (60:1 or greater) may be used for some or all of the sheets with the prior approval of PDSD when it is determined legibility and the ability to be digitized and/or reduced for archiving will not be affected. COMMENT: All sheets must be drawn to an engineering scale as noted above, revise the plan sheets as required. 3. - 2-06.3.3, All lettering and text (upper or lower case), and numbering, shall be a minimum of 3/32 inches in height to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for archiving. COMMENT: Verify that all text meets the minimum text height of 3/32. The text for the legal description on the cover sheet appears to be less than the minimum required text height. The text height used on sheet two is also less than the required text height. Review all sheets and adjust the text height as per this standard if the height is less than 3/32 or the engineering scale equivalent. 4. - 2-06.3.6, Provide a blank three (3) inch by five (5) inch block in the lower right corner of the plan adjacent to the title block on the first sheet of the development package for use by Pima County Addressing. COMMENT: The plan sheets have been provided with a 3 x 5 inch box as noted in this standard but sheet one needs an additional box above the one that has already been provided. The box on the cover sheet is always used by Pima County Addressing. Better yet, instead of providing the 3 x 5 boxes for the development package approval stamp you can download the digital approval stamp and insert it into all you r plan sheets. The approval stamp of the cover sheet should be placed of the 3 x 5 inch box required for Pima County Addressing. The following link will get you to the web site to download the digital stamp in one of three formats, dwg, jpg, and pdf, http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp If you have any questions or problems downloading the digital stamps feel free to call or email me. 5. - 2-06.3.7 - A small, project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet and section, 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS - 4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile, and provide the following information. A. Show the subject property approximately centered within the one (1) square mile area. B. Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property. C. Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 6. - 2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. COMMENT: Add the required information of this standard to applicable sheets, (site, grading sheets). 7. - 2-06.3.11 - A key plan (if provided) shall be located on the first sheet, and 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS - 4.6, If the project is located within the boundaries of a Planned Area Development (PAD) zone, include a reduced-scale map of the PAD on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed. COMMENT: The key plan must include the entire PAD drawn at a reduced scale and the subject parcel indicated. Revise the key plan as per these standards. 8. - 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS - 4.1 - The name, mailing and addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. COMMENT: List the email address for the Project Architect listed on the cover sheet. 9. - 2-06.4.2, - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat. COMMENT: If the parcel is a lot in a recorded subdivision the legal description should be specific to the lot to be developed and if the lot is to be split, combined, or re-subdivided by a newly recorded plat the new legal description should be listed in the title block, otherwise use the text format in the following paragraph below. COMMENT: The title block should include a brief legal description under the name of the project. The brief legal description can be something such as i.e., "A Portion of the NW Qtr of the SE Qtr of the SW Qtr of the S ½ of S.13, T. 13, R. 13". (It should be written based on the applicable location.) 2-06.4.2.B - The administrative street address. COMMENT: List the property address on the cover sheet 10. 2-06.4.3 - Relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. COMMENT: This project has been assigned the development package case number DP13-0093. List the DP case number associated with this project on all plan sheets next to the title block. (Also, review the activity numbers listed in the lower right corner of the cover sheet of S11-044 and include any related activity numbers to this plan that are not listed presently.) 11. 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile, and provide the following information. A. Show the subject property approximately centered within the one (1) square mile area. B. Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property. C. Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. COMMENT: The location map on the cover sheet must be drawn based on the above criteria. Revise the location map per this standard. 12. 2-06.4.6 - If the project is located within the boundaries of a Planned Area Development (PAD) zone, include a reduced-scale map of the PAD on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed. COMMENT: The key plan should be drawn to include the overall Houghton Town Center area for clarity as it relates to location of this project in relation to the overall site. (It is clear this is not a PAD but it would make it very clear where the proposed development is located on the overall site.) 13. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes - The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. COMMENT: To ensure consistency with all plans for the overall development it is encouraged for the consultant to review the general notes on the cover sheet as well as any applicable notes to the Scenic Corridor etc that apply to the Houghton Town Center Plat as it provides additional notes that need to be added to the cover sheet and other applicable sheets of this plan. The project number assigned to the referenced Plat is S11-044 and the plans sheets can be viewed through the COT PRO website, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO/pro/AdvancedSearch.jsp 14. 2-06.4.7.D - Utilities Note - All development package documents are to include the following note: "Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public." COMMENT: This note has been listed twice under the General Notes text block on the cover sheet. Note 22 and 29 are the same note. Remove one and also replace the word "ALL' with the word 'Any' at the beginning of the sentence. 15. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions - The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within fifty (50) feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of fifty (50) feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 2-06.4.8.A and 4.9.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. COMMENT: The text height on the ALTA Survey is less than the required minimum height allowed by the A.M. 2-06.3.3. Increase the text height of the perimeter distance bearings and for those perimeter distance and bearings and the bold text is not legible. Address as required for text height and legibility. Label the parcel perimeter distance and bearings on sheet 3 of 15 (Site Plan). (The drawing scale must be an engineering scale for all plan sheets, see comment number 2.) COMMENT: Prior to approval of the development package, lots 22 and 23 will have to be combined and any recorded documentation for the lot combo must be provided to PDSD Zoning Review as verification of the lot combo. COMMENT: Draw, label and reference block one on the site plan sheet 3 16. 2-06.4.8.B and 2-06.4.9.L All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. COMMENT: Any existing or proposed easements must be drawn, labeled with the width and purpose of said easement along with any recordation information. If applicable, any abandonment or vacation of existing easements must be noted on the plan. This information is probably best added to the utilities plan sheet but the easements if any should be drawn and labeled on site sheets as well. 17. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.B - Identify each block or lot by number within the subdivision boundary and include the approximate square footage of each, or a note may be provided stating that all lots comply with the minimum lot size requirements. COMMENT: Identify the new lot number once lots22 and 23 are combined or the description of the new parcel. Also as requested to draw and block one, label the block as reference. 18. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two (2) or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. COMMENT: Label the actual adjacent zoning to the development parcel and remove from the site plan sheets, the words "USE: GENERAL MERCHANDISE" labeled around the parcel. If split zoning exists adjacent to the boundary of the parcel, delineate and label the zoning boundary lines accordingly. 19. 2-06.4.9.H - Proposed traffic circulation: 2-06.4.9.H.1 - Proposed traffic circulation will be designed in accordance with Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual, to include streets, intersections, street names, right-of-way widths, curve radii of centerlines and curb returns, and proposed improvements, such as pavement, curbs, access points (driveways), accessible ramps, and sidewalks. Street improvements, such as sidewalks, curbs, pavement, and accessible ramps, do not need to be drawn on the plan if such information is provided on typical street cross sections. COMMENT: It is acknowledged that a new street is not to be built interior to the development but access to the specific development is through a drive entrance along Houghton Road according to this plan. Clarify how much infrastructure is in place that will provide the necessary vehicle access to the Panda Express pad. Label and dimension the width of the sidewalk providing pedestrian access from Houghton Road to the onsite pedestrian circulation and to the pedestrian circulation to the Panda Express building. This circulation must also be accessible to comply with any ANSI requirements. Callout any required early warning devices (truncated dome pads) where they are required by the Building Code accessibility section. 20. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. COMMENT: Draw, label and dimension the existing and future Sight Visibility triangles at the Houghton Road and site driveway entrance. 21. 2-06.4.9.H.2.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. Per UDC article 7 section 7.4.6.H.1, Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. Wheel stops must be provided at all parking areas where parking spaces abut a landscape area. There are 4 landscape areas on this project where the vehicles will overhang the landscape islands. Add wheel stops 2.5 feet from the edge of the landscape islands. Label and dimension the wheel stops. 22. 2-06.4.9.H.2.5.c - Show all loading zones, and vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route, and provide, as a note, the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, and the design vehicle(I am not sure what is meant by the term design vehicle) Per the calculations on the cover sheet 2 loading zones are to be provided on lot 22, yet there are no loading zones provided for this specific development. Clarify if loading zones are required or proposed for this Food Service on per this development package plan. (It is acknowledged that the calculations section on the cover sheet will have to be revised to reflect the lot combo and any revisions to not only the loading zone requirements but also the vehicle and bicycle parking requirements that are referenced for lot 22.) 23. 2-06.4.9.H.2.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. The location and type of long term bicycle parking could be verified on the site plan. The proposed development is required to provide a minimum of two (2) long term spaces. Draw, label, and indicate the type of facility that will be provided. If the facility is to be provided somewhere within the building indicate as such and provide detail drawings that demonstrate compliance for the long term facilities. 24. 2-06.4.9.M.1 and .2 - Grading Plan - 1. A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan. 2. Concurrent Review. For all projects, grading plans may be included in the development package and will be reviewed concurrently. The grading plan has been reviewed by zoning to ensure compliance with the site plan as presented. While the grading plan is in substantial compliance with the site plan as submitted for this initial review the site plan may have to be revised based on plans reviewer comments. Any changes that are necessary and made to the site plan must also be made to the grading and landscape plan sheets. Once zoning approves development package it is also approves the grading plan unless there remain outstanding issues with regards to compliance with site plan, 25. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. Add an overall building setback from the Houghton Road right of way line. 26. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. There does not appear to be any pedestrian connection for the sidewalk system around the building to the sidewalk system along the drive along the south of the proposed development. Provide a sidewalk (accessible) connection from the sidewalk along the drive to the sidewalk system adjacent tot eh building. Pedestrian connections may not be provided through the Drive-through lane. 27. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code is required. If applicable draw and label any proposed freestanding ground mounted signs. Provide the size and type of the signs. 28. The calculations on the cover sheet will have to be revised to accurately represent the new lot once combined and the lot numbers should reflect what is recorded with the lot combo. All calculations need to be revised where applicable based on any revisions made to the site plan. In the calculations text block remove the words Land Use Code and replace with the words Unified Development Code. 29. Be aware that additional comments may be forthcoming based on the revisions that are made site plan, grading or landscape sheets. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents. |
| 06/05/2013 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET A100 1. Add an accessible parking space quantity summary for 2 spaces. SHEET A101 2. Provide an accessible route to: a. The rest of the commerical development b. The public right of way 3. Add an additional requirement to note 32: "All accessible route slopes are to comply with the 2009 Edition, ICC A117.1, Section 403.3; 5% maximum running slope and 2% maximum cross slopes". SHEET A408 4. At detail 4: a. Indicate maximum 2% grade slopes at all accessible parking spaces and accessible aisles in all directions. b. The flared sides of the curb ramp are to be sloped at a maxium of 1:10. c. At both sidewalk ramps leading down to the landing, delete the arrows pointing up and down and add an arrow to both leaders at the 1:12 slope note. d. At the landing, show a max 2% slope towards the aisle. e. Add the 8'-0" dimensions to the accessible parking spaces. 5. At detail 5 add the "Van Accessible" sign. 6. At detail 15 add a note stating that the detectable warnings are to be included as required by the 2009 Edition, ICC A117.1, Section 406.12, 13 and 14 as applicable. 7. At detail 14, add to the boxed note: ..."SHALL COMPLY WITH THE 2012 IBC, ICC A117.1, SECTION 705". END OF REVIEW |
| 06/06/2013 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 06/06/2013, SUBJECT: Panda Express at Home Town Center DP13-0093, T15S, R15E, SECTION 26 & 35 RECEIVED: Development Package on May 24, 2013 The subject submittal has been reviewed and it can not be approved at this time. Address the following comments before review can continue. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location in the Drainage Report and on the Development Package where the revisions were made: Drainage Report: 1. Submit a drainage report that addresses onsite and offsite drainage and their impact on the subject site. Additionally, the report shall address the provision of runoff detention/retention and any other needed drainage facilities. 2. The drainage report shall address the basins and drainage facilities maintenance requirements and responsibility in details. Additionally, it shall provide the proposed drainage structure maintenance checklist that addresses all drainage structures including the detention/retention system. 3. Provide, in the report, a drainage exhibit that includes all existing and proposed drainage related information including scuppers, ground and water surface elevations, drainage structures, slopes, drainage arrows, dimensions, materials, etc. 1. Address, in the report, drainage facilities maintenance requirements and responsibility and specify that inspections shall be performed by a registered civil engineer annually and/or after every major storm. Additionally, provide a drainage facilities maintenance checklist to facilitate the required maintenance. 2. Explain in the text the building roof drainage direction and explain if sidewalk scuppers will be required. Show the roof drainage direction and provide the scuppers design calculations if proposed. 3. Address the maximum disposal time for the proposed retention basins based on the basins infiltration rates found in the Geotechnical Report. Verify, that the basins will completely empty out in about 12 hours or less as required by Section 3.5.1.3.a of the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual. If bleeders are utilized to drain the retention basins, verify that they are adequate to drain them in the required time. Provide basins' inlet and outlet details to clarify the proposed structures and the location and elevation of the bleeders. 4. Address the required building setbacks from the retention and water harvesting basins based on the recommendation of the Geotechnical Report. 5. According to Section 3.3.5 "Low-Flow Channels" of the Stormwater Retention Manual, the proposed basins floors should be sloped to provide positive drainage especially if bleed pipes will be utilized to drain out the basins. The section recommends a minimum of 0.5% floor slope and 0.2% low flow concrete channel slope. Please be advised that based on the City's experience with similar projects, 0.5% slope was difficult to construct and maintain which resulted in nuisance ponding in the basins. Show the provided positive drainage on the drainage exhibit and provide the inlet and outlet proposed grades. 6. If there was a master drainage report for the entire subdivision that addressed all the required drainage information, submit a copy of the master report. Development Package: 1. It does not appear that the "Legal Description" font, on sheet one, meets the requirements of (A.M. 2-06.3.3). Revise as necessary. 2. Provide a title block that meets the applicable requirements of A.M. 2-06.4.2 including the administrative address. 3. Provide, on every sheet, the complete case number (DP13-0093) (A.M. 2-06.4.3). 4. The provided location map is not adequate to show the exact project location. Provide a location map that is in compliance with (A.M. 2-06.4.4). 5. Revise General Note #6 to reference the correct detail number and the correct "Standard Details" document name. 6. General Note #8 is not used. Revise. 7. Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system (A.M. 2-06.4.8.A). 8. Show, on the plan, the tie between the basis of bearing and one of the corners of the parcel (A.M. 2-06.4.8.A). 9. Show, if applicable, any existing onsite easements (A.M. 2-06.4.8.B). 10. Provide all adjacent private or public right of way names, widths, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks, as required by (A.M. 2-06.4.8.C). 11. Dimension all access driveways and PAAL's (A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.1.) 12. Show sight visibility triangles as required by A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.2. 13. Include a general note that specifies the PAAL's and parking spaces dimensions are taken from the gutter line (A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.). 14. Clarify if there are any proposed easements (A.M. 2-06.4.9.L.). 15. Provide additional grades in the center of the PAAL's and show the proposed high and low points (A.M. 2-06.4.9.M.). 16. If applicable, show the detention/retention basins and water harvesting 100-year ponding limits with water surface elevations (A.M. 2-06.4.9.N.1). 17. Show proposed buildings roof drainage directions (A.M. 2-06.4.9.N.2). 18. Provide sidewalk scuppers if roof drains discharge onto sidewalks or walkways. Additionally, show retention basin bleed pipes if applicable (A.M. 2-06.4.9.N.3). 19. Show, if applicable, the detention/retention basin maintenance access ramp(s) (A.M. 2-06.4.9.N.3). 20. Provide the construction details of all proposed drainage structures including materials, dimensions, etc. (A.M. 2-06.4.9.N.3). 21. Provide filter fabric underneath the proposed riprap described in Construction Keynote #19 (A.M. 2-06.4.9.N.3). 22. It looks like Keynotes #15 and #16 were not used on Sheet 9 of 15. Revise as needed. 23. Show the required building setbacks from the proposed retention and water harvesting basins (A.M. 2-06.4.9.O). 24. Either provide the standard construction detail for the trash enclosure or reference the standard detail in the notes (A.M. 2-06.4.9.T). 25. Fill in the correct information instead of the question marks in Additional Note 3 on Sheet 9 of 15. 26. Add the following standard grading notes: a. The approved Development Package/Grading Plan is the only acceptable construction plan onsite. The Contractor may not use any other plans, such as the approved Tentative Plat and/or Development Plan, for construction purposes. The Contractor may ask the Development Services Inspector to consult with the other approved plans for additional information or details that might not be included on the approved grading plan but needed for completion of work. b. The contractor shall remove the fine materials from the bottom of the detention/retention basin and scarify the basin bottom once the construction activities are completed in order to remove any fine material build up caused by construction and to restore soil percolation. Install BMP's at the basin inlet(s) to prevent the fines from entering the basin c. Any proposed engineering work to be done below grade (i.e. toe-downs, cutoff walls, drainage pipes/structures, etc.) shall not be back filled until Development Services Inspector inspects the work and approves it. d. The contractor is not permitted to make an autonomous decision to carry out construction field changes without prior written approval from the Engineer of Record and the City of Tucson Development Services Department. e. "CALL FOR SWPPP INSPECTION AND PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETINGS. FOR A PDSD ENGINEERING INSPECTIONS, CALL IVR (740-6970), OR SCHEDULE WITH A CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE AT THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, OR CONTACT DSD ENGINEERING AT 791-5550 EXTENSION 2101, OR SCHEDULE INSPECTIONS ONLINE AT: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/inspections". f. The project will be in compliance with City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01.0 or Technical Standard 2-01.0 (Excavation and Grading). g. A copy of the approved Development Package/Grading Plan, Grading Permit, and any Geotechnical Reports shall be kept at the site at all times, until final grading approval. h. Any revision to the Development Package/Grading Plan MAY require a re-submittal of a revised grading plan for review. Contact PDSD Engineering at 791-5550 to discuss changes in grading design. i. If grading construction is expected to last longer than the expiration date of the grading permit, contact PDSD to renew/extend the Grading Permit. If Final Grading Inspection has not been completed before the Grading Permit expires, and the permit has not been renewed, additional fees and reviews may be required. j. See the associated Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan as a part of this grading permit. k. Contact Permits and Codes at 791-5100 for any questions regarding any right-of-way permit requirements. l. As-builts and letters of completion for basin and overall project are required. m. The Engineer of Record shall submit a statement of conformance to as-built plan and the specifications. n. The permitee shall notify the PDSD when the grading operation is ready for final grading inspection. Final grading approval shall not be given until all work, including installation of all drainage facilities and their permanent protective devices, and all erosion control measures have been completed in accordance with the approved grading plan and grading permit, and any required reports have been submitted. o. Depress all landscaped areas a maximum of 6" for waterharvesting" Landscape Plan: 1. Ensure that the proposed landscaping does not conflict with the basin inlets, outlets, and access ramps. 2. Ensure that the proposed landscaping does not obstruct visibility within the sight visibility triangles. Geotechnical Report: 1. Revise the Geotechnical Report to address retention basin soils percolation rates. 2. The Geotechnical Report shall address the required building setbacks from ponding water within the retention and waterharvesting basins. 3. The report shall address, if applicable, slope protection requirements. SWPPP: 1. Submit a copy of the SWPPP report that satisfies the requirements of State of AZ general permit. 2. Revise "Sequencing and Scheduling of Construction Activities and Disturbance Activities" section, to include the following first two activities: a- Determine the disturbance limits. b- Install the proposed BMP's within these limits. 3. Include a copy of the completed (signed by the owner) NOI form that was submitted to ADEQ (Part III.D.3). Provide some blank forms for the unknown operators. (Part IV.F) Each operator is responsible for submitting a completed NOI to ADEQ and to the City of Tucson. Please note that the remaining signatures from the operators must be on the onsite copy of the SWPPP at or before commencement of construction. 4. Include a copy of the authorization certificate received from ADEQ (Part III.D.2). 5. Include a dated and signed certification form for each known operator (including the owner) in accordance with Part VII.K. (Part IV.J.1). 6. BMP's are required around all existing and proposed drainage structures and their inlets and outlets. 7. Show on the SWPPP exhibit the locations of on-site material storage, waste storage or receptacles, borrow areas, (Part III.C.3.e). 8. Identify the nearest receiving waters on the Location Map (Part III.C.4). 9. Revise the SWPPP exhibits in accordance with the Site and Grading Plan comments. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4933 or Laith.Alshami@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan Package, drainage report, Geotechnical Report and SWPPP |
| 06/07/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/10/2013 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the plans as requested by other agencies. Revise the landsape plans such that all improvements and site information shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. AM 2-10.2.0, AM 2-10.4.1.A |
| 06/10/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | I have no issues with this request. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept 837-7428 |
| 06/11/2013 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Three rolled sets of the plans 2) All items requested by review staff 3) All items needed to approve this plan. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/19/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |