Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP13-0080
Parcel: 11207150D

Address:
2550 E WATER ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP13-0080
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/13/2013 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Denied Please indicate the location of the existing fire hydrant that will serve this development. I could not find it noted on the plans other than the statement on C-1 and could not find symbol 19 noted on sheet C-2.
05/13/2013 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed
05/14/2013 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Planning and Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Water Street - Multi Family Development
Development Package (1st Review)
DP13-0080


TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 15, 2013

DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) & Technical Standards Manual (TSM) were addressed.

1. This site was reviewed for full code compliance for the entire site. The site includes parcels -07-152A, 112-07-150D & 112-07-1510.

2. Remove all references to the Land Use Code (LUC) and Development Standards (D.S.) from the plan and provide the applicable UDC sections.

3. See the attached determination letter in regards to Group Dwellings.

The following comments are based on the requirements of Administrative Manual (AM) 2-06.0.
Development package review comments;

4. A.M. 2-06.3.3 All lettering and text (upper or lower case), and numbering, shall be a minimum of 3/32 inches in height to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for archiving. That said there are numerous dimension strings that are unreadable. Also under "ZONING CODE CHECK" there are text strings over text strings that are not readable.

5. A.M. 2-06.3.6 Provide the new "DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE" approval stamp on all development package sheets. This stamp can be found in "jpg, dwg, pdf" format at http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp.

6. A.M. 2-06.4.2 The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:
a. A.M. 2-06.4.2.B A brief legal description
b. A.M. 2-06.4.2.E The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e xx of xx).

7. A.M. 2-06.4.2.D Zoning acknowledges that A.M. 2-06.4.2.D states that an administrative street address is to be provided in the title block. After discussion with Pima County Addressing the administrative street address is to be provided adjacent to the title block. That said provide an administrative address adjacent to the title block.

8. A.M. 2-06.4.3 Provide the development package number, DP13-0080, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

9. A.M. 2-06.4.4 The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile, and provide the following information:
a. A.M. 2-06.4.4 Section, township, and range; section corners; and the scale will be labeled.

10. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.1 As this site is made up of three (3) parcels, 112-07-152A, 112-07-150D & 112-07-1510, and will operate as a single site, provide the gross area of the site by square footage and acreage as a general note on the plan.

11. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.4 The proposed use listed under "ZONING AND LAND USE" should be listed as "MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT SUBJECT TO USE SPECIFIC STANDARDS 4.9.7.B.6, .9, & .10

12. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.5 List the total number of units for the entire site, see note 1 above.

13. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.8 Provide a density calculation on the plan for the entire site, see note 1 above.

14. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.8.a Provide a lot coverage calculation for the entire site, see note 1 above.

15. A.M. 2-06.4.8.A Provide site boundary perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system.

16. A.M. 2-06.4.8.C The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way
17. adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. Provide this information for both Water & Spring Street

18. A.M. 2-06.4.9.A this site is made up of three (3) parcels, 112-07-152A, 112-07-150D & 112-07-1510, a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combination Request form with you next submittal.

19. A.M. 2-06.4.9.F All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined.

20. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.2 Show the required sight visibility triangles (SVTs) on the plan.

21. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.4 Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned.

22. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5 Provide fully dimensioned parking areas for the entire site, see note 1 above.

23. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a Provide a typical parking space detail for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled.

24. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a Provide a vehicle parking space calculation for the entire site, see note 1 above.

25. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a C-2, Keynote 17, shows a site wall encroaching into the proposed vehicle parking space shown near the northeast corner of Unit C.

26. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d Provide a Short and Long term bicycle parking space calculation for the entire site, see note 1 above.

27. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d Sheet C-2, Keynote 17, shows a site wall running through the proposed bicycle parking shown at the northeast corner of Unit C.

28. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d It appears that the location of the proposed Short-Term bicycle parking, called out under Keynote 35, encroaches into the vehicle overhang for the parking to the east.

29. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d Per UDC Section 7.4.9.B.2.f show the required 2'x6' parking space on detail 2 sheet C-2.

30. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d Per UDC Section 7.4.9.B.2.g A bicycle rack must be a minimum of two and one half feet from a wall or other obstruction. Show the 2'-6" dimension from the rack to the walls shown on detail 2 sheet C-2.

31. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d Show the location of the Long-Term bicycle parking on the plan.

32. A.M. 2-06.4.9.O Provide building elevations so that required perimeter yard setbacks can be verified.

33. A.M. 2-06.4.9.Q Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

34. A.M. 2-06.4.9.R Clarify where the sidewalk goes that is shown running west along the front of Unit C. It appears to run into the adjacent property. If a connection to the property to the west is proposed a recorded cross access agreement is required.

35. A.M. 2-06.4.9.R There is a sidewalk shown running along the east side of Unit C. Sheet C-2, Keynote 17, shows a site wall running through the proposed sidewalk.

36. A.M. 2-06.4.9.R Provide width dimensions for all sidewalks shown on site, see note 1 above.

37. A.M. 2-06.4.9.V If applicable show gang mailboxes indicating location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP13-0080

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & cross access & parking agreements.

Determination letter attached to site card.
05/17/2013 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Denied SHEET C-1
1. As per Table 1106.1 of the 2012 IBC, two accessible parking spAces are required for your provided 30 total spaces.
a. Please add another accessible parking space with aisles, ramps, markings and signage as per the 2009 ICC A117.1.
2. Add the following to note 10: "2009 Edition, ICC A117.1, Section 403.3".
3. Where does note 49 come in to play.
SHEET C-2
4. At note 23 add "5% running slope as per 2009, ICC A1171.1, section 403.3".
END OF REVIEW
05/21/2013 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Revise the zoning code check section so it is legible. Revise all dimensions and labels in the site plans to be at least 3/32 inch. (AM 2-06.3.3)
Show Spring Street on the site and grading plans. Include all required information for all adjacent streets. (AM 2-06.4.8.C)
Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. (AM2-06.4.8 A)

Since this proposed project is part of a larger site, provide a complete site plan for the overall site. All easements and all other development package site plan requirements must be met.
05/21/2013 LEERAY HANLY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
05/24/2013 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change 1. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.1 This site is made up of three (3) parcels, 112-07-152A, 112-07-150D & 112-07-1510, and will operate as a single site. Submit landscape plan indicating how entire site will meet full code compliance.

2. AM 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data.

3. Include the flowing on the landscape:

4. Include the relevant case number(s) on the lower right corner of each sheet.

5. Graphically show the ultimate size of plants indicated by the spread of canopy, circumference of shrubs, or spread of ground cover.

6. If necessary location, size, and name of existing vegetation to remain in place

7. Screening:

" Location of screening elements;
" Height of screening material and reference point for measurement;
" Nature of screening material (e.g., permanent or temporary as in phased development); and,
" Type of screening material (e.g., masonry wall, wood fence, species of plant material).

8. Separate Irrigation Plan

" Type of water conserving irrigation systems proposed and differentiation between systems for the different water use zones on the site;
" Source of irrigation water;
" Indicate potable or reclaimed water use. Reclaimed water system specifications, if used;
" System specifications and system design and layout (Section 4-01.4.2, Irrigation Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual);
" Extent of supplementary irrigation in each planting area, provided by water harvesting methods;
" Point of drainage off roof areas, amount of flow, and disposition of flow;

9. Grading Information

" Grade changes across the site indicated by one-foot interval contour lines or by spot elevations;
" Percent slope across the site and the direction of the slope of paved areas;
" Existing grades on adjacent rights-of-way and adjacent sites. If an adjacent right-of-way or site is under construction, show the proposed finish grades;
" Extent of grading boundaries if a portion of the site is to be kept in its natural undisturbed state. Indicate natural contours of undisturbed areas;
" Areas of detention/retention, depths of basins, and percentage of side slope;
" The methods by which water harvesting or storm water runoff is used to benefit the oasis allowance area and other planting areas on the site; and,
" Percent side slope of berms.

10. Submit NPP plan per AM 2-11.0

11. Ensure that all Zoning & Engineering comments are addressed.
05/24/2013 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied Submit NPP plan per AM 2-11.0

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/06/2013 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed