Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP13-0002
Parcel: 11706168A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP13-0002
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/01/2013 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Planning and Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: 5th & Congress - Elevator Addition
Development Package (1st Review)
DP13-0002

TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 2, 2013

DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) & Technical Standards Manual (TSM) were addressed.

1. This site was reviewed for full code compliance for the additions and areas of change.

2. This project requires Design Review per the Design Review Board (DRB) and Historic Review. Contact Joanne Hershenhorn @ 520-837-6976 or email at Joanne.Hershenhorn@tucsonaz.gov for DRB review requirements and Frank Dillon @ 520-837-6957 or email at Frank.Dillon@tucsonaz.gov for Historic review requirements. Both reviews must be completed and approved prior to approval of this development package. Provide the DRB and Historic review number, date of approval, and if applicable any conditions of approval on the plan.

The following comments are based on the requirements of Administrative Manual (AM) 2-06.0. Development package review comments;

1. A.M. 2-06.4.2.E Provide the sheet number 1 of 1 on all sheets.

2. A.M. 2-06.4.3 Provide the following relevant case numbers on the plan adjacent to the title block on all sheets, DP13-0002.

3. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.1 List as a general note: "EXISTING ZONING IS OCR-2"

4. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.2 List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage.

5. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.6 Provide a general notes stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA SEC. 5.4, MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE, Sec. 5.11, 5.11 Rio Nuevo District (RND), 5.12 Downtown Area Infill Incentive District (IID)

6. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any.

7. A.M. 2-06.4.9.F All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined.

8. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.d As new bicycle parking, Short & Long term, is proposed provide a detail for the Short-Term bicycle parking that shows how UDC Sections 7.4.9.B & .C are met and a detail for Long-Term bicycle parking that shows how UDC Sections 7.4.9.B & .d are met.

9. Remove all references to the Land Use Code (LUC) and Development Standards (DS) from the plans at they are not longer applicable.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP13-0002

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package.
08/02/2013 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed
08/02/2013 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied Please indicate location (and diameter) of underground fire service.
Please locate proposed (if any) and existing fire hydrants, with dimensions to property lines.
08/02/2013 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Revise the site drawing to include the following information:
a. The location and size of water lines, and fire hydrants.
b. The location and size of sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number.
c. The points of connection to existing public sewers.
d. The locations of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles, and communications cables, on-ground junction boxes, and street lights.
e. Any existing or proposed utility easements
f. The first floor elevation of the building in the area affected by this activity.
Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual No. 2-06.0.0, Section 4.8 and Section 107.2.13, IBC 2012.
08/08/2013 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: August 9, 2013
SUBJECT: Connect on Congress Development Plan Package- Engineering Review
TO: Miguel Fuestevilla
LOCATION: 300 E Congress St, T14S R13E S12 Ward 6
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP13-0002

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the following link for further clarification:
http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

The following items need to be addressed:

SITE PLAN:


1) AM Sec.2-06: Revise the development plan document to remove all references to the Land Use Code (LUC) and Development Standards (DS) as they are not longer applicable. All notes must reference the correct UDC, AM or TSM Sections since this review falls under the UDC.

2) AM Sec.2-06.4.2.D: Revise the development plan document to provide the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e Sheet 1 of 1).

3) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: The relevant Development Plan Package case number (DP13-0002) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets.

4) AM Sec.2-06.4.4: Revise the development plan document to provide a project location map to meet the minimum requirements within the referenced section; show the property approximately centered within 1 square mile, label sections, township and ranges, section corners, north arrow and scale (3"=1 mile).

5) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.A.6: Revise the development plan document to provide a general note stating "This project is designed to meet the overlay zones criteria Sec.5.4, Major Streets and Routes Setback Zone. If other overlays are applicable please include them in the note as well.

GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Plan Package that addresses the comment provided above. For expedite purposes the development plan package can be reviewed over the counter (PDSD Engineering Division comment only) for stamp approval once all items have been addressed. Please call to schedule an appointment when ready.

For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
08/09/2013 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change The following comments pertain to:

UDC ARTICLE 7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

7.6.4. LANDSCAPE STANDARDS

UDC ARTICLE 5: OVERLAY ZONES

5.8. "H" HISTORIC PRESERVATION ZONE (HPZ)

This project requires Design Review per the Design Review Board (DRB) and Historic. Both reviews must be completed and approved prior to approval of the development package. Provide the DRB and Historic review number, date of approval, and if applicable any conditions of approval on the plan.

Plantings and other ornamental features shall reflect the historic period of the subject structure. Landscaping may be reviewed in the context of a required HPZ review; landscaping alone shall not be considered through an HPZ review.

The Planning and Development Services Department Director may grant a complete or partial exception to the landscape border standards for development within a HPZ. The exceptions may be granted if, after completion of the HPZ development review required by the HPZ, the PDSD Director determines that the standards are not compatible with the character and design elements of the HPZ.

Ensure that all zoning and comment are addressed

Additional comments may apply.
08/12/2013 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
08/20/2013 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Denied 1. Provide a large scale detail of the ramp showing all accessibility requirements such as dimensions, grade changes, slopes, handrails, rise and run definations and landings.
a. Provide elevations of the handrails.
END OF REVIEW
08/27/2013 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
08/30/2013 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed