Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP12-0215
Parcel: 14043013B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP12-0215
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/16/2012 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Passed COT OWNED PROPERTY REFERENCE ADA FOLDER FOR ACCESSIBILITY COMMENTS
11/19/2012 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Passed
11/23/2012 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: November 29, 2012
SUBJECT: Raytheon Data Centers Development Plan Package- Engineering Review
TO: Metro TED Attn: Lisa Bowers
LOCATION: 1151 E Hermans Road; T15S R14E Sec19; Ward 5
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP12-0215


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under Development Standard 2-01. The following items need to be addressed:


SITE PLAN:

1) DS Sec.2-01.3.1: Revise the development plan document to include the contact name within the Owners Section.

2) DS Sec.2-01.3.3: The relevant Development Plan Package number (DP12-0215) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets.

3) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.2: Revise the development plan document to show design of the vehicular use area as required by Zoning per LUC 3.3.6.

4) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan document to clearly label the required separation of the proposed vehicular use area at the end of each proposed PAAL termination. Refer to LUC 3.3.6.8; A barrier, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond project area, damaging adjacent landscaping, fencing, or unpaved areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site.

5) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.3: Revise the development plan document to provide a construction detail for the proposed extension of the existing 24" CMP. Provide a detail for the connection of the pipes and any associated headwall design or erosion protection for the pipe inlet.

6) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Revise Keynote #6 that references COT/PC #207 for the curb access ramps for the driveway entrance, this detail does not meet ADASAD requirements per Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner, for private onsite improvements.


SWPPP: The SWPPP does not meet the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). Revise the SWPPP according to these comments:

7) Part III.A.3 and VIII.J.2: Ensure the SWPPP is signed by a person meeting the certification requirements of the Permit Part VIII.J. Specifically provide the contact name for the owner (COT Real Properties) under Section 1.2 on Sheet 7. Also have the owner sign the Owner's Certification Paragraph in Section 10.0 on Sheet 8.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Plan Package that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

Further comments may be generated upon re-submittal of the Development Plan Package. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
11/26/2012 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Denied GENERAL
1. Please delete all references to ADA and reference instead to "2010 ADASAD".
SHEET 2 AND 3
2. At note 6: The use of PC/COT 207 is for DOT right of way accessible desin standards only and may not be used for private property. Please change reference to 2010 ADASAD, Section 406.
3. At note 11: Detectable warnings are no longer required by the 2010 ADASAD in this situation. Please delete all detectable warnings (truncated dome) accordingly.
4. Please provide a large scale detail of the ramp and stair system to the modular office buildings showing all accessible requirements such as dimensions, slopes, widths, elevations, landings, riser and tread height and widths, handrails (plus handrail elevations) and etc.
5. The pedestrian gate looks like a turn style type of entrance gate. This is not an acceptable accessible entry gate. Please provide a 3' wide man gate.
SHEET 4
6. Please add a "Van Accessible" sign.
END OF REVIEW
11/28/2012 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Passed
11/28/2012 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Revise the site drawing to include the following information:
a. the location and size of the public or private sanitary sewer
b. the location of the building connection to the public or private sanitary sewer
c. the location, invert, and rim elevation of the upstream and downstream manholes and cleanouts
Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.0.0, Section 3.8 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
11/28/2012 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Passed
11/30/2012 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied Please indicate location(s) of existing and/or proposed fire hydrant locations, with dimensions to property lines.
Please indicate project will include a fire department approved lock box.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/03/2012 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed