Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP12-0158
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/17/2012 | CPIERCE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/18/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/20/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | This review has been completed. Resubmittal is required. |
| 09/21/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 09/21/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Culvers's at 1st & River Development Package (1st Review) DP12-0151 & T12SA00315 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 21, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0: 1. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the development package number, DP12-0158, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2. D.S. 2-01.3.4 Identify the section corners on the location map. 3. D.S. 2-01.3.A.4 Sheet 1 "ZONING AND LAND USE NOTES" #6, the verbiage listed after LUC 3.5.4.6.C is not correct. Section 3.5.4.6.C references "SOUP KITCHENS ARE NOT ALLOWED". 4. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.6.b Sheet 1 "ZONING AND LAND USE NOTES" #9, Add the LUC Section "2.8.2" to the note. 5. D.S. 2-01.3.8.A The northeast property line appears to be made up of two (2) segments. Provide the bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, and the distances in feet for the southern most segment. 6. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B There are "1' NO ACCESS EASMENTS" shown on the last approved development plan. Show these easements on the plan and provide the recordation information. 7. D.S. 2-01.3.9.F There is a zoning reference to the west of 1st Avenue of "COT ZONE CB-1", this reference should be County Zone CB-1. 8. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5. Show the required drive-through stacking spaces on the plan. 9. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5. Show the required 1' setback between the building, at the pick-up window, and the drive-through. See LUC Section 3.3.6.6.B.1.b 10. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5. Provide a width dimension for what appears to be a one-way PAAL adjacent to the "CUSTOMER WAITING LINE". 11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a The vehicle parking calculation is not correct. The required number should be 51. 12. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.c The loading space calculation is not correct. Per LUC Section 3.4.3.2 Calculations for Loading Areas. The calculation for the required number of loading areas is based on the proposed land use and the size of the project as provided in Sec. 3.4.5. The size of the project is the gross floor area of the use, including any outdoor area dedicated to the use, but excluding vehicular use areas. That said based on 5,104 sq. ft. One (1) type A loading space is required for this project. Revise the calculation and show the loading space on the plan. 13. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Demonstrate on the plan or a detail how the requirements of LUC Section 3.3.9.4.B, .C & .E are met. 14. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O Per LUC Section 2.8.2.5.A The maximum height of a structure will be one-third (1/3) the distance of the structure from the future right-of-way line. That said based on a 52.78' distance form the right-of-way the maximum height of your building is 17.59' 15. D.S. 2-01.3.9.Q Show the footprint for the "DINING AREA (COVERED) on the plan and provide the height of the proposed cover. 16. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R As it appears parking vehicles will be allowed to over-hang the sidewalk shown along the west side of the proposed building the sidewalk is required to be a minimum of 6'-6" wide, 2'-6" overhang and minimum sidewalk width of 4'-0". 17. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R There are two sidewalks with marked crosswalks shown, one east and one south of the building the direct pedestrians into a vehicle use are. Clarify the purpose of these sidewalks. The southern stripped area located between the vehicle parking spaces is require to be a sidewalk physically separated from the parking area. 18. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R Demonstrate on plan or detail that the proposed accessible signs do not encroach in to the required 4'-0" sidewalk. 19. D.S. 2-01.3.9.W All signage, directional, menu, preview, shown on the plan will require separate permits. Provide a note on the plan stating that separate permits are required. The following comments are based on LUC Section 2.8.2. 1. Per LUC Section 2.8.2.4.A A buffer area thirty (30) feet wide, adjacent to the MS&R right-of-way line, is to be preserved and maintained in its natural state. The buffer area shall be in lieu of the landscape border required along street frontages under Sec. 3.7.0, Landscaping and Screening Regulations. That said as this is a full code compliance review. Show the required 30' buffer and the native vegetation will need to reestablished. 2. As the proposed project has a street frontage of greater than two hundred (200) feet demonstrate on the plan how the requirements of LUC Section 2.8.2.6.B are met. 3. Per LUC Section 2.8.2.5.A The maximum height of a structure will be one-third (1/3) the distance of the structure from the future right-of-way line. That said based on a 52.78' distance form the right-of-way the maximum height of your building is 17.59' If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0158 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. |
| 09/21/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/27/2012 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Show and identify existing plants to remain in place on the landscape plan. Include plants in the adjacent right-of-way areas. DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.e 2) Within the Scenic Route buffer area and the MS&R right-of-way, all areas between the MS&R right-of-way line and the existing street right-of-way that are disturbed by development shall be revegetated with native vegetation. 3) Within the 30' scenic route buffer area, indigenous plant material is to remain. If any disturbance occurs during construction or prior to permit application, the buffer area is to be revegetated with native plants indigenous to the site and the area reconstructed to look as natural as possible. DS 2-06.7.1.B 4) Fencing is required during construction for all undisturbed natural desert areas and individual Protected Native Plants to be preserved-in-place. The area to be fenced shall be beyond the "drip-line" of the vegetation by one-half (½) the distance of the "drip-line" radius. DS 2-15.6.0 Show the grading boundaries and fence locations on the NPP Plan. 5) Applications for projects within the Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ) shall be reviewed in accordance with the DSD Full Notice Procedure, Sec. 23A-50 and 23A-51. The decision to approve or deny the project will be based on the purpose, intent, and specific regulations of LUC 2.8.2. The SCZ review will likely include comments on the plant palette, the extent of grading/construction along the River Rd. frontage and requirements to employ a rip-rap treatment that provides a natural appearance. 6) Provide screening and landscaping along the southern boundary per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. 7) Revise Landscape Note 1 to correspond with SCZ regulations. In most cases screened rock is not appropriate for the scenic route buffer area of the adjacent ROW areas. |
| 09/27/2012 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Passed | |
| 10/01/2012 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | October 1, 2012 DP12-0158 Culvers Restaurant 1. Direct runoff from building and parking areas to and through landscaping areas to maximize water harvesting. (LUC 3.7.4.3.B) The Development Package plan sheets and water harvesting sheet appear to meet this requirement. Ensure the report is consistent with the plans. 2. On sheet 2, provide all keynotes for call-outs used on this sheet. Check other sheets for completeness as well. 3. Per the Transportation Access Management Guidelines section 5.7, the minimum curb return radius for a driveway or PAAL to an MS&R arterial or collector is 25 feet. Revise the plan to provide 25-foot radii at the entrances. 4. Revise the plan as necessary to be consistent with the requirements of the Scenic Review. |
| 10/01/2012 | LEERAY HANLY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | ALL SITE SEWER AND WATER SUPPLY WORK FOR RESTAURANT WILL REQUIRE APPROVAL AND INSPECTIONS AS PART OF RESTAURANT BUILDOUT. |
| 10/04/2012 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | The Access Ramps at the three proposed driveway locations may not be acceptable to TDOT-Engineering. Please provide a PDF via email for TDOT review of the ramps. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/19/2012 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |