Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP12-0144
Parcel: 13705293A

Address:
5160 S 12TH AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP12-0144
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/04/2012 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Approved
09/04/2012 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed
09/04/2012 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved DATE: September 10, 2012
SUBJECT: El Tingon Tire Shop Development Plan Package- Engineering Review
TO: George Hayduke
LOCATION: 5160 S 12th Ave; T14S R14E Sec17; Ward 1
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP12-0144


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under Development Standard 2-01. The following items need to be addressed:


DRAINAGE STATEMENT:

1) Provide a Drainage Statement for the property to ensure conformance with Balanced Basin Design per DS Sec.10-01. The property is located within a Balance Basin of Wyoming Wash and the Drainage Statement needs to show pre and post imperviousness that demonstrates alleviation of offsite flows.


SITE PLAN: It is recommended that Development Standard 2-01 "Development Package" be reviewed prior to resubmittal. DS Sec.2-02 and 2-05 no longer exists and all reviews fall under DS Sec.2-01 for Development Package. The standard has changes that must be incorporated into the plan sheets for review and approval.

2) DS Sec.2-01.2.5: Revise the development plan document to include the CDRC approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. The link to the stamp can be found here: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp

3) DS Sec.2-01.3.1: Revise the development plan document to include the name, mailing and email addresses and phone numbers of the registrant, persons, firms, etc that prepared the Development Plan Package.

4) DS Sec.2-01.3.3: The relevant Development Plan Package number (DP12-0144) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets.

5) DS Sec.2-01.3.4: Revise the project-location map to correctly label the section corners in plan view. Refer to redlines.

6) DS Sec.2-01.3.7: Provide the following note on the development plan document stating; "All retaining walls, proposed fencing and other walls will require a separate permit for review and approval by all necessary Planning Development Services Departments."

7) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.A.6.b: Provide a General Note on the Development Plan Package that references all special overlay zones that are applicable to this site, specifically state that "the project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria for Sec.2.8.3 Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone."

8) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.B.1.a: Revise the development plan document to include a Drainage Note per the referenced standard specifically; "The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall."

9) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.B.3.a: Revise General Note #3 of the development plan to correctly state the drainage note per the referenced standard; "Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this development plan."

10) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.D: Revise the development plan document to include a General Note per the referenced section; "Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public."

11) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.C: Revise the development plan document to include all information regarding the existing public right-of-way for Utah Street. Label the width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

12) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.2: Revise the development plan document to correctly dimension the near side sight visibility for the PAAL to the MS&R Street per DS Sec.3-01.5.3. Per the table the near side dimension should be 20'x345' not the labeled 380', revise.

13) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.2: Revise the development plan document to design the vehicular use area to relocate the proposed parking spaces within the future MS&R sight visibility triangles. Required parking spaces can not be constructed within the future SVT per DS Sec.3-01.5.1.B.2, revise.

14) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5: Revise the development plan document to clearly dimension all PAAL widths to verify minimum requirements, specifically the PAAL located to the eastside of the proposed building for 2-way traffic. Verify the 1-foot separation from the structure and 24-foot PAAL per LUC 3.3.6.6.B.1.a.

15) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.J: Revise the development plan document to label all dimensions for the MS&R Route, 12th Avenue. Since the project site is adjacent to a Major Street & Route clearly label and dimension the future sidewalk area.

16) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.J: Revise the development plan document to relocate the proposed 30-inch screen wall to be constructed completely onsite. The proposed screen wall can not be constructed within the future MS&R right-of-way as shown.

17) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Revise Keynote #34 on the development plan document to reference the PC/COT Standard Detail for Public Improvement for the proposed concrete sidewalk, or provide a detail in the plan set to meet minimum conformance with said detail.

18) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Revise the development plan document to verify that pedestrian circulation connects all buildings to all other areas of development, pedestrian circulation within the right-of-way, and to the proposed refuse enclosures per DS Sec.2-08.3.1.

19) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project.

20) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.T: Revise the development plan document to provide the minimum 5-foot width of sidewalk within the right-of-way of 12th Avenue per DS Sec.3-01.3.3.A. Due to a full code compliant submittal review and the existing curb along 12th Avenue right-of-way a 5-foot wide sidewalk is required along the entire right-of-way that is adjacent to the property line.

21) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.T: Verify or provide approval through Environmental Services for refuse pickup. Per DS Sec.6-01 onsite refuse collection is required and the development plan package should reflect the location and access to the required refuse container. If Environmental Service is not requiring onsite collection then PDSD Engineering will approve this comment based on their written approval for refuse collection.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Plan Package and Drainage Statement that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

Further comments may be generated upon re-submittal of the Development Plan Package. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
09/04/2012 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved Comments have not been addressed. JG
09/19/2012 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approved 1. Provide the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines DS 2-10.3.1

2. Indicate square footage of all landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g.

3. Wall, Screens, and Vegetation with a height greater than thirty (30) inches cannot be located within the sight visibility triangle (SVT) required by Development Standard 3-01.0. Dasylirion wheeleri and Tacoma stans will grow in excess of 30". Revise plant selection as necessary.

4. A 5' wall is required to screen vehicle use area from adjacent office zoned properties per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. All required wall must be of masonry material or masonry with a stucco textured finish

5. Add note to landscape plan: The area between the right-of-way line and sidewalk and the area between the sidewalk and the curb, if not covered with vegetation, shall be covered with an appropriate inorganic ground cover, such as decomposed granite.

6. All landscape areas will be depressed to accept water flow from roofs, PAAL, and parking areas. Show by detail or spot elevations how landscape areas will accommodate water harvesting.

7. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan.

8. Additional comments may apply.
09/21/2012 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Approved 1. Zoning may require a pedestrian access way to the 12th AV right of way. If so, this pedestrian way must be accessible. Reference Zoning comments.
a. Please provide all necessarry curb ramps, marked crossing, detectable warnings and accessible routes.
2. Please provide detectable warnigs strips at the marked crossing from the accessible parking to the bottom landing of the existing ramp as per ICC A117.1, Section 406.12, 13 and 14.
3. All the slopes of all accessible routes are to comply with ICC A1171., Section 403.3, 5% max running and 2% max cross.
4. At detail 1/2 of 4: Please notes that all accessible parking areas including the access aisle shall have slopes in all directions at a maximum of 2% as required by ICC A117.1, section 502.5.
5. Detail 2/2 of 4:
a. Provide a "Van Accessible" sign on the sign pole just below the reserved parking sign.
b. The bottom of the reserved parking sign is to be 7'-0" above finished grade.
END OF REVIEW
09/21/2012 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
09/25/2012 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
09/26/2012 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Approved DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

PROJECT: DP12-0144
5160 S. 12th Ave.
Development Package

TRANSMITTAL DATE: 09/26/12

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. DS Sec.2-01.2.5: Revise the development plan document to include the correct CDRC approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. The link to the stamp can be found here: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp.

2. DS 2-01.2.6 Revise the section corners on the location map to the correct numbers.

3. DS 2-01.3.1 The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer.

4. DS 2-01.3.7.A.6.b Provide a general note indicating that this project has been designed to meet the criteria of Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets & Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone.

5. DS 2-01.3.8.A Per a search of the county assessor records this property is only one tax parcel not two as indicated on the site plan. Remove the property line indicated on the plan running through the center of the property.

6. DS 2-01.3.8.B All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Provide for the easement along the west side of the property.

7. This site must be designed to meet the future MS&R criteria. The landscape border screen wall, etc. cannot be locate within the future right of way unless a future site plan is submitted, along with this proposed plan, showing how the site will work once the right of way is taken. A MS&R Covenant would be required to recorded and a note on the future site plan that any changes to site will be done at no expense to the City of Tucson at time of widening. This comment will require a change to the parking, PAALs, landscape, screen walls, etc. on the future site plan. The following comments are based on the site plan as submitted

8. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5 Clearly dimension all PAALs. The minimum width of a two way PAAL is 24'. Missing behind the parking spaces facing 12th Ave.

Per LUC Sec. 3.3.6.6.B.1 PAALs shall be setback at least one (1) foot from An open structure, such as a carport or covered pedestrian access path as measured from the closest part of the structure or roof overhang.

Per LUC Sec. 3.3.6.8.A Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas or unpaved areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. Barriers ae required along the north property line, around the proposed island and around the area near the sign.

9. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Long bicycle parking with a minimum of 2 spaces is required for this site. The use area counts the same as GFA. Provide a detail of the long term bicycle parking locker, access aisle, etc.

10. DS 2-01.3.9.O The indicated setbacks are incorrect for the east and south setbacks. Any property fronting an MS&R uses developing area setbacks. Per LUC Sec. 3.2.6.5.B the required setback along 12 th Av is 21' or the height of the structure from the back of future curb. The setback along Utah is 21' or the height of the structure from the edge of the nearest travel lane. Revise notes and plans.

11. DS 2-01.3.9.Q Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

12. DS 2-01.3.9.R Show on-site pedestrian circulation as required by the LUC utilizing location and the design criteria in Development Standard 2-08.0.

Per DS 2-08.3.1 Within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation path is required. This path must connect all public access areas (buildings) of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets. Must connect to sidewalk at 12th Ave.

Review DS 2-08.4 and DS 2-05 for location, size, materials, slope, etc.

Striped asphalt can only be used at a cross walk crossing a PAAL. All other pedestrian circulation paths must constructed of concrete. Revise plans.

13. DS 2-01.3.9.T Clearly indicate the location of the required trash enclosure and maneuverability for vehicles for the trash enclosure.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961

C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\DP12-0144.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
02/15/2013 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed