Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP12-0143
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/28/2012 | GBONILL1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/29/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/14/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Please indicate location of proposed fire hydrant with dimensions to property line. (I've seen the water plan and believe hydrant location is satisfactory, but it should show up on DP) |
| 09/19/2012 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. At detail 5/C1.0: a. Detectable warnings are not required in this situation. Accessible parking aisles are safe zones, no vechile access. Please remove the detectable warning strip. b. The slope of the parking area and aisles are to be 2% maximum in all directions as per ICC A 1171.1, section 502.5. 2. Details 3 and 4/C1.0: Please add a "Van Accessible" sign just below the reserved parking sign. 3. At note 12, please include the maximum slope requirements as per ICC A117.1, Section 403.3; 5% max running and 2% max cross. END OF REVIEW |
| 09/19/2012 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: DP12-0143 5145 S. 1st Ave. Development Package - Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL: 09/26/2012 DUE DATE: 09/26/2012 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 08/27/2013. 2. DS 2-01.2.5: Revise the development plan document to include the correct CDRC approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. The link to the stamp can be found here: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp 3. DS 2-01.3.2.E Number all sheets in the package in sequence. Example: 1 of 10, 2 of 10, etc. 4. DS 2-01.3.3 This project has been assigned case number DP12-0143. Place this case number near the lower right corner of all sheets. Add the case number S06-044 to all sheets within the package near the lower right corner. 5. DS 2-01.3.7.A.4 The proposed use indicated on sheet C-1.0 is not correct. The correct use should read as follows: "Neighborhood Recreation "12", subject to: Sec. 3.5.13.2 and Sec. 3.5.13.3" 6. DS 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Provide the amount of proposed lot coverage percentage. Lot coverage includes all vehicle use areas and square footage of the foot print of the building. 7. DS 2-01.3.8.A The tax parcel combo has been completed. Remove all dashed property lines from the plan that were a part of the tax parcel combo. 8. DS 2-01.3.8.B Clearly indicate on sheet C-1.0 the 10' landscape and public utility easement along the north boundary of this lot. 9. DS 2-01.3.9.G Per review of the aerial photos it appears this subdivision is being phased. If the project is to be phased, provide calculations, setbacks, etc., to indicate that each phase complies with all requirements as a separate entity. Show phase lines on the drawing. Revise the tentative plat. 10. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5 The proposed backup spur at the south end of the parking lot does not meet LUC Sec. 3.3.6.6.D.3 A minimum distance of three (3) feet shall be provided between the back of spur and any wall, screen or other obstruction over six (6) inches in height. 11. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.d The detail for the short term bicycle parking racks does not meet the criteria of LUC Sec. 3.3.9.2.B.6 Each required short-term bicycle parking space must be at least two (2) feet by six (6) feet. See LUC Sec. 3.3.9.5.B Minimum distance between racks is 4'. 12. DS 2-01.3.9.Q On the footprint of the proposed building, provide overall dimensions and proposed height of the structure. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\DP12-0143tp.doc |
| 09/26/2012 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the landscape plan to include the location and purpose of utility easements and other easements. DS 2-07.2.2.E.1 2) Trees and shrubs and screening elments are to be selected and located so that, at maturity, they do not interfere with existing on-site or off-site utility service lines or utility easements or with solar access. LUC 3.7.2.6.B 3) Include the legal description and address of site on the site and landscape plans. DS 2-07.2.1.b 4) Revise the landscape to include a maintenance schedule per DS 2-072.2.A.4 including: A) Pruning schedules to show that plant material will maintain pedestrian and vehicular clearances or that the material will establish opaque hedge screens B) Replacement criteria, should plant material not survive. C) Replacement or upkeep maintenance schedules for inert ground cover materials. D) Maintenance schedules for exterior hardscape materials. E) Maintenance and replacement schedules for irrigation systems. 5) Revise the landscape plan to provide the square footage of the oasis allowance area and calculation. DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.b 6) The site is required to include screening per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Revise as necessary. LUC 3.7.3 & DS 2-06.3.7. 7) Show and label all existing proposed screen walls on the development plans and landscape plans. DS 2-07. 8) The grading plan included in the package appears to be part of the plans for T12PI00004. A separate application may be required if this is an intended revision for that project. A separate site grading application may also required. Consult with the PDSD Engineering reviewer. 9) Revise Landscape Note as appropriate. The plan appears to specify turf. 10) Submit an irrigation plan that details the standards for turf irrigation. LUC 3.7.4.5.C. Refer to DS 2-06 for special requirements for turf areas. 11) Identify the source of water on the irrigation plan. Identify the water meter and backflow preventer locations and type. 12) Revise C-1.0 to match the number and location of trees shown on the landscape plan, or consider removing them from the site plan. 13) Locate the Acacia greggii in accordance with the following standard: Vegetation, such as those with spines, thorns, or needles, that may present hazards to pedestrians, bicycles, or vehicles are to be planted a safe distance from the outer branch tips to the edge of a walkway, bike lane or path, roadway, or parking area access lane (PAAL). The growing characteristics of the vegetation are to be taken into consideration when determining this distance. Revise the plans as necessary to comply. DS 2-06.3.8.A 14) Revise the landscape plan to include the specific plants specified on the landcape plan for Sunnyside Pointe (S06-044). These plants may have been required for Native Plant Preservation mitigation or other purposes. The plants previously shown can be included in this plan in order to avoid additional revisions to related plans. Use the exact genus and species from the previous plans. |
| 09/26/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the site drawing for lot 45 to include the following information: a. the location and size of the water meter and backflow preventer b. the location of the main water lines and fire hydrants c. the location of the gas meter (if one is planned) d. the location and size of the public sanitary sewer e. the location of the building connection to the public sewer f. the location, invert, and rim elevation of the upstream and downstream manholes and cleanouts g. the first floor elevation for the building Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.0.0, Section 3.8 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 09/26/2012 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | September 26, 2012 The Engineering Section recommends approval. Loren Makus, EIT |
| 09/27/2012 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | This review has been completed. Resubmittal is required |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/28/2012 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | REJECT SHELF | Completed |