Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP12-0103
Parcel: 141185240

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP12-0103
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/10/2012 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
07/11/2012 RONALD BROWN ADA REVIEW Passed
07/12/2012 JOSE ORTIZ COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
07/13/2012 KBROUIL1 COT NON-DSD FIRE Approv-Cond The proposed fire hydrant will need to be located to the island located to the west of the proposed island to avoid the gate during fire ground operations. The FDC should also be located in the island a minimum 3 feet away from the fire hydrant. The gate will be required to have rapid entry capabilities for the fire department.
07/17/2012 JWILLIA4 WWM REVIEW Denied PIMA COUNTY
REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT
201 NORTH STONE AVENUE
TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207
JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 740-6500
DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135


July 12, 2012

To: Jeff Hunter
Hunter Engineering

Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager
City of Tucson Development Services Department


____________________________________________
From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department

Subject: Blue Bell Creameries
Site Plan - 1st submittal
DP12-0103

The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use:

1. Obtain a letter from the PCRWRD's Development Liaison Unit, written within the past year, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at:

http://www.pima.gov/wwm/developer.htm#permits

The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Ref. A

2. Sheet 7: The required General and Permitting Notes are missing.Refer to Pima County Development Services "Development Plan Review, Checklist Requirements" section J. WASTEWATER, for submittal requirements. The checklist is available at;

http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/DevPlanReq.pdf

3. Sheet 8: Call out the IMS #'s for all of the existing public sewer manholes shown on plan. Also call out the construction plan # for the existing public sewer line shown on plan. Ref. A
4. Sheet 8: Call out the slope and length for the proposed private BCS shown on plan. Ref. A

5. Sheet 8: The existing public sewer line shown in East Old Vail Rd should terminate at MH# 3311-01. Ref. A

6. Sheet 8: The cleanout shown near the property line should be located a minimum of 5' inside the property line. Ref. A

7. Sheet 8: Call out the entire 4" line from the point of connection to the public sewer as private. Ref. A

8. Sheet 8: The BCS should not be shown connecting to the existing public manhole but should be shown connecting directly to the existing line a minimum of 5' away from the manhole. Ref. A

This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents.

Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet.

The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter.

If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly.

cc: Chad Amateau, PE Checked by:_________
Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager
DLU Project folder

Ref. A. Development Plan Checklist Requirements - Chapter 18.71 of the Pima County Code - Section J
http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/2006/DP_Requirements2Aug04.pdf

Ref. C - Arizona Administrative Code, Title 18, Chapters 5 & 9 (R18-5-205)
http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-05.htm
and (R-18-9-E301)
http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-09.htm

Ref. D - PCRWRD Procedures, Preliminary Sewer Layout Requirements, 1984 (revised April 1988)
http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/procedures.pdf

Ref. E - PCRWRD Design Standards for Public Sewerage Facilities, 1983 (revised April 1988)
http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/design_standards.pdf

Ref. F - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Details
http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/all_det.pdf

Ref. G - Pima County Code of Ordinances, Title 13 - Public Services, Division II - Sewers
http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientID=16119&stateID=3&statename=Arizona

Ref. H - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Specifications for Public Improvements, 2003 Edition
http://dot.pima.gov/transeng/stdspecsdet/standardspecs2003.pdf

Ref. I - PCRWRD Engineering Directives
http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/directives/
07/31/2012 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Planning and Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Blue Bell Creameries - 9398 E. Old Vail Road
Development Package (1st Review)
DP12-0103

TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 31, 2012

DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This site is being reviewed for full code compliance.

The following comments are based on Development Standards 2-01.0

2. D.S. 2-01.2.4.5 Provide the City of Tucson (COT) new "DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE" approval stamp in the lower right quadrant on all sheets. This stamp can be found in "jpg, dwg, pdf" format at http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp.

3. D.S. 2-01.3.1 The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The information as provided on sheet 1S-1 does not meet the location requirement.

4. D.S. 2-01.3.2.B Provide a brief legal description within the title block.

5. D.S. 2-01.3.2.D Zoning acknowledges that D.S. 2-01.3.2.D states that an administrative street address is to be provided in the title block. After discussion with Pima County Addressing the administrative street address is to be provided adjacent to the title block. That said remove the address from the title block and provide the address adjacent to the title block.

6. D.S. 2-01.3.2.D.E Provide the page number and number of pages on all sheets i.e., sheet 1S-1 should have sheet 1 of 16

7. D.S. 2-01.3.3 _Provide the development package number, DP12-0103 in the lower right hand corner adjacent to the title block on all sheets

8. D.S. 2-01.3.4 Provide a project location map that meets the requirements of Development Standard (D.S.) 2-01.3.4. The Vicinity Map shown on Sheet 1S-1 does not meet this standard.

9. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.1 List as a general note: "EXISTING ZONING IS I-2."

10. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 As a general note identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the Land Use Code. List all Land Use Code sections each proposed use is subject to. That said the existing use should be shown as "VACANT", proposed use should be shown as "PERISHABLE GOODS MANUFACTURING "35", SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.5.1 AND SEC. 3.5.5.2.A AND .B"

11. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.6.b Provide a general notes stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA SEC. 2.8.3, MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE & Sec. 2.8.5, AIRPORT ENVIRONS ZONE (AEZ)".

12. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.7 Provide the annexation number "C9-84-84" in the lower right corner adjacent to the title block of each sheet.

13. 13. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Provide a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) calculation the meets the requirement of LUC Section 3.2.11. This calculation with show the allowed floor area (FA) and proposed floor area. Per LUC Section 2.8.5.8.C.1.a The maximum FAR is .40 of the project site area for land uses in the Industrial, Wholesaling and Storage land use groups.

14. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Provide the required information for all easements on the plan.

15. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.2 Provide the size of the sight visibility triangles (SVTs) shown on sheet
1S-1.

16. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a The provide vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. The calculation is based on the gross floor area of the propose use. That said based on the proposed use of Perishable Goods Manufacturing per LUC Section 3.3.4.2, INDUSTRIAL USE GROUP, the required number of vehicle parking spaces would be 14,165/1000 = 14 vehicle spaces required.

17. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a As required vehicle parking spaces are proposed within the proposed gates called out under keynote 16, provide a note on the plan stating "VEHICLE GATES TO REMAIN OPEN DURING BUSINESS HOURS".

18. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d The provide bicycle parking space calculation is not correct. Per LUC Section 3.3.8.2.B, INDUSTRIAL USE GROUP, 0 Short-term are required, 2 Long-term bicycle parking spaces are require. That said the bicycle parking calculation should be as follows; Short-term required 0, provide 6, based on what is shown on the plan, Long-term required 2, provided 0. A Board of Adjustment for Variance will be required for not providing the Long-term bicycle parking.

19. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d The provide detail for the short-term bicycle parking does not meet the requirements of LUC Sections 3.3.9.2.B.6 & 7. For your information per LUC Section 3.3.9.2.B.4 A single rack is designed and located to accommodate two bicycles.

20. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d If Long-term bicycle parking is going to be provided, provide a long-term bicycle parking detail that meets the requirements of LUC Section 3.3.9.4.

21. D.S. 2-01.3.9.Q Provide the height of the proposed building within the footprint of the building(s).

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com

Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0103

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
07/31/2012 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC REVIEW Denied SHEET 1GS-1
1. Relocate the ramp in front of the accessible parking aisle. In fact, better redesign the whole accessible parking space layout as per Sheet 1S-1. These are not the same. Please reconcile.
SHEET 1S-1
2. The accessible parking space is not the same as deplicted on sheet 1GS-1. Please reconcile.
3. Note 48 and detail 4/1S-3 conflict. Please reconcile.
4. Delete the truncated dome requirements as per note 18. These are not required at the accessible parking aisle.
5. Detail 4/1S-3 does not represent a typical accessible parking detail as designed for this project. Please delete this as a typical detail and provide another large scale accessible parking detail that represents the design shown on detail 1/1S-1.
a. Please show all accessible requirements such as dimensions, grade slopes, signage, aisles, access to accessible route, ramps, "Van Accessible" space and signage, all markings and etc.
b. Detail 4/1S-3 may be used for signage and marking requirements of COT DOT only and does not supersede accessible requirements
SHEET 1S-3
6. Accessibility requirements for this project are governed by
the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC A117.1, 2003 Edition. Please remove all ADA references and replace with the above accessible code stated.
7. At detail 3, delete the truncated dome requirements and provide detectable warning strips as per ICC A117.1, Sections 406.12, 13 and 14 (2' deep).
8. Delete detail 8 as a typical accessible parking space reference. It is to be used for COT DOT signage and marking requirements, not covered by the governing code, only. Specifications for van accessible spaces and quantity of accessible parking spaces are to be deleted and referenced to the governing accessible code reference to in comment 6 above.
END OF REVEIW
08/01/2012 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Street landscape borders shall be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee LUC 3.7.2.4.A.3. Obtain permission for use of public right of way.

2. NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN LUC 3.8.3.1 The provisions of this Division apply to all new development. A Native Plant Preservation Plan shall consist of the information itemized according to the preservation and mitigation methodology chosen by the applicant LUC 3.8.6.1.

3. All commercial development and site plans submitted after June 1, 2010, shall include a rainwater harvesting plan. The rainwater harvesting plan shall include a landscape water budget and an implementation plan.

" The landscape water budget shall calculate the estimated volume of water required yearly for all site landscaping detailed in the development and/or landscape plan.

" The implementation plan shall show how any combination of capture, conveyance, storage, and distribution will be utilized on-site to harvest rainwater. Implementation plans shall comply with applicable development standards for water harvesting applications.

" The implementation plan shall also provide for water metering of all onsite landscape water through either:
" A separate water meter connected to the main water supply; or,
" An irrigation sub-meter.

4. The rainwater harvesting plan shall be submitted concurrently with the site plan and landscape plan. Submit Rainwater harvesting plan per DS 10-03.

5. Provide the following notes on the landscape plan:

2-06.6.0 MAINTENANCE STANDARDS.

6.1 Plant Materials.

A. Any plant material in areas of required landscaping that does not survive will be replaced with an equivalent size and species within thirty (30) days.

B. Plant material will be pruned as necessary to control size but not to disrupt the natural growth pattern or characteristic form of the plant except as necessary to achieve height clearance for visibility and pedestrian passage or to achieve a continuous opaque hedge if required.

C. Clipping and pruning of the plant material are required to allow maximum shading while preserving surveillance opportunities and preventing obstructive overhang into walks, curb areas, drives, and line of sight triangles.

For general guidelines on height clearance of tree canopies, refer to Sec. 2-06.3.6.D, Sec. 2-06.3.6.E, Sec. 2-06.3.6.F, and Sec. 2-06.3.7.D.

D. All dead or removed plant material will be replaced with plant material acceptable under the requirements of the xeriscape landscaping regulations. Replacement material will be a minimum fifteen (15) gallon size for trees and five (5) gallon size for shrubs.

E. Regular landscape maintenance should ensure water efficiency and include, but not be limited to, pruning, mulching, weeding, litter removal, aerating areas, and fertilizing nonnative plant materials.

6. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan.

7. Additional comments may apply.
08/02/2012 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2961.95') is less than 12" below the first floor elevation (2962.75'). Provide a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
2. Provide cleanouts in the building sewer at intervals not exceeding 100 feet. Reference: Section 719.1, UPC 2006.
08/09/2012 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Joe Burke, P.E. DATE: August 9, 2012
Hunter Engineering, Inc.
10450 N. 74th St., Ste. 200 Scottsdale,, Arizona 85258

Subject: Blue Bell Creameries, 9398 E. Old Vail Rd.
Development Package, DP12-0103 (First Review)

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Package and Drainage Statement

The Development Package (DP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Development Package:

1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP.
2. A three (3) inch by five (5) inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. D.S. 2-01.2.5.
3. The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. D.S. 2-01.2.7.
4. A legend that shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing is to be provided, preferably on the first sheet. D.S. 2-01.2.9.
5. The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. D.S. 2-01.3.1.
6. The project-location map shall cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile, and provide the following information. D.S. 2-01.3.4.
A. Show the subject property approximately centered within the one (1) square mile area.
B. Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property.
C. Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled.
7. General Notes. The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. D.S. 2-01.3.7.
6. List special exceptions, zoning variances, zoning and development standard modifications, overlay zones, and other reviews that are applicable to the project.
b. List overlay zones that are applicable to the property, such as Sec. 2.8.1, Hillside Development Zone (HDZ); Sec. 2.8.2, Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ); Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone; Sec. 2.8.4, Gateway Corridor Zone; Sec. 2.8.5, Airport Environs Zone (AEZ); Sec. 2.8.6, Environmental Resource Zone (ERZ); Sec. 2.8.7, Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; Sec. 2.8.8, Historic Preservation Zone (HPZ), 2.8.9 Drachman School Overlay (DSO), or 2.8.10 Rio Nuevo And Downtown (RND) of the LUC; or Sec. 29-12 through 29-19 Watercourse Amenities, Safety, and Habitat (WASH) Ordinance of the Tucson Code, by case number, in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note state that the project is designed to meet the overlay zone(s) criteria, and provide the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and conditions of approval. If there is more than one (1) lot within the site, the note should specify which lots are affected by the overlay zones. Projects involving Historic Preservation Zones, Downtown Heritage Incentive Zones (involving demolition), or overlay zones, require separate review and approval.
c. If the property includes Protected Riparian Area add a note stating that the project is designed to comply with Development Standard 9-06.0., specifying all lots impacted and including a total for the regulated area and the Protected Riparian Area.
B. Drainage Notes. List the following notes as appropriate.
1. List the following notes on all plans/plats.
a. "The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall."
3. List the following note on all development package documents
a. "Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this (site or development) plan."
C. Streets and Roads Notes.
2. List the following note on all development package documents: "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Development Standard 3-01.0."
3. Provided the following notes as applicable:
a. "Total miles of new public streets is ____________.
b. Total miles of new private streets is ____________.
If both are zero, list as zero.
D. Utilities Note. All development package documents are to include the following note:
"Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public."
F. Trails Notes. List the following notes as appropriate.
3. The Eastern Pima County Trails System Master Plan does not show any trails on or adjacent to the development site.
8. Existing Site Conditions. The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within fifty (50) feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of fifty (50) feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. D.S. 2-01.3.8.
B. All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.
C. The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.
D. The following information regarding existing utilities shall be provided: the location and size of water wells, water pumping plants, water reservoirs, water lines, fire hydrants, sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number; locations of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles, and communications cables, on-ground junction boxes, and street lights. If water mains and sewers are not located on or adjacent to the tract, indicate the direction, distance to, and sizes of those nearest the property. Identifying the locations of all utilities and service equipment immediately adjacent to the project is especially important in situations where pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation or landscaping can be in conflict. By knowing the location of the existing utilities, design of the project can take those elements into consideration and can help avoid expensive and time-consuming relocation of utilities, major redesign, or requests to vary regulations after commencement of construction.
E. Indicate the ground elevation on the site based on City of Tucson Datum (indicate City of Tucson field book number and page).
G. If the project is to be phased, provide calculations, setbacks, etc., to indicate that each phase complies with all requirements as a separate entity. Show phase lines on the drawing. Show and label any temporary improvements that may be needed to make the site function for each phase as one entity. If such temporary improvements are off
the site of the phase under consideration, a temporary easement or other legal documentation to assure legal use of the property is required. Note recording information.
2. Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.
3. Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability.
I. Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development package documents have been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes. Projects bounded by streets having only a portion of the right-of-way width dedicated will be required to dedicate right-of-way, up to one-half (½), to complete the street width. Should there be any proposed street or alley vacation, provide this information. If vacation has occurred, include the recording
N. In conjunction with a drainage report or statement, as applicable, prepared in accordance with the City Engineer's instructions and procedures, the following information will be indicated on the development package documents. For additional information regarding drainage standards, see the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management.
1. Show areas of detention/retention including 100-year ponding limits with water surface elevations.
6. The 100-year flood limits with water surface elevations for all flows of one hundred (100) cfs or more will be drawn on the development package documents.
7. Draw locations and indicate types of off-site runoff acceptance points and/or onsite
runoff discharge points.
O. All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.
T. Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Development Standard 3-01.0. Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Development Standard 6-01.0. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that Standard, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm.
W. Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26 may be required.

Drainage Report:
1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR.
2. The quantity of the stormwater calculated using the "Hydrologic Design Data Record Rational Method" seems a bit low. Using the City of Tucson's 100-yr peak estimator in the "Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Flood Plain Management" is required to estimate the amount of stormwater generated by the project. Revise the Drainage Report to include the peak estimator's data sheets.
3. Addendums to any Drainage Reports and Hydrology Reports etc. are not accepted. The new layout or revisions must be incorporated into the approved Drainage Report.
4. If applicable, add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR.
5. Depending on the results of the peak estimator, additional comments may be necessary.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson - Planning and Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 837-4932 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
C:/ 9398 E. Old Vail Rd._DevPkg
08/10/2012 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied This review has been completed. The resubmittal will need to include 3 rolled sets of the revised plans, WWM fee and all other documents required.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
08/15/2012 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed