Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP12-0094
Parcel: 10816008E

Address:
4930 N 1ST AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP12-0094
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/29/2012 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
07/02/2012 RONALD BROWN ADA REVIEW Passed
07/10/2012 JWILLIA4 WWM REVIEW Denied PIMA COUNTY
REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT
201 NORTH STONE AVENUE
TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207
JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 740-6500
DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135


July 6, 2012

To: KEN PERRY
PERRY ENGINEERING

Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager
City of Tucson Development Services Department


____________________________________________
From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department

Subject: SKYLINE PEDIATRICS, P.C.
Site Plan - 1st submittal
DP12-0094

The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use:

1. Obtain a letter from the PCRWRD's Development Liaison Unit, written within the past year, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at:

http://www.pima.gov/wwm/developer.htm#permits

The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Ref. A

2. The required General and Permitting Notes are missing.Refer to Pima County Development Services "Development Plan Review, Checklist Requirements" section J. WASTEWATER, for submittal requirements. The checklist is available at;

http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/DevPlanReq.pdf

3. Call out the IMS #'s for all of the existing public sewer manholes shown on plan. Also call out the construction plan # for the existing public sewer line shown on plan. Ref. A
4. Call out the slope and length for the proposed private BCS shown on plan. Ref. A

This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents.

Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet.

The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter.

If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly.

cc: Chad Amateau, PE Checked by:_________
Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager
DLU Project folder

Ref. A. Development Plan Checklist Requirements - Chapter 18.71 of the Pima County Code - Section J
http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/2006/DP_Requirements2Aug04.pdf

Ref. C - Arizona Administrative Code, Title 18, Chapters 5 & 9 (R18-5-205)
http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-05.htm
and (R-18-9-E301)
http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-09.htm

Ref. D - PCRWRD Procedures, Preliminary Sewer Layout Requirements, 1984 (revised April 1988)
http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/procedures.pdf

Ref. E - PCRWRD Design Standards for Public Sewerage Facilities, 1983 (revised April 1988)
http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/design_standards.pdf

Ref. F - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Details
http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/all_det.pdf

Ref. G - Pima County Code of Ordinances, Title 13 - Public Services, Division II - Sewers
http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientID=16119&stateID=3&statename=Arizona

Ref. H - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Specifications for Public Improvements, 2003 Edition
http://dot.pima.gov/transeng/stdspecsdet/standardspecs2003.pdf

Ref. I - PCRWRD Engineering Directives
http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/directives/
07/11/2012 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Scenic Corridor review and approval is required prior to completion of this submittal. Include with re-submittal approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site plan, the case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed.

2. Submit a separate landscape sheet with information indicated in DS-2-06 & 2-07

3. Within the required buffer area, indigenous plant material is to remain. If any disturbance occurs during construction or prior to permit application, the buffer area is to be revegetated with native plants indigenous to the site and the area reconstructed to look as natural as possible DS 2-06.7.1.B. Revise landscape plan as necessary to demonstrate how scenic buffer will be revegetated.

4. WATER HARVESTING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN. The Water Harvesting Implementation Plan (Implementation Plan) shall consist of a separate sheet from the landscape plan with a plan view layout of the site. The format and design of the Implementation Plan shall be consistent with the base plan.

5. Plant canopy area (square feet) that is served by each WHIA, consisting of the sum of understory, midstory and overstory plant canopies at 60 percent of the mature plant sizes DS 10-03.4.2.B.2. Check canopy area calculations and revise plan as necessary.

6. The Site Water Budget shall detail the landscape water demand and the harvested water supply needed to meet 50 percent of landscape demand. The Site Water Budget and the Water Harvesting Implementation Plan shall be consistent with one another DS 10-03.4.1 Verify that overall water demand calculations are correct.

7. Indicate spot elevations for the bottoms of water harvesting structures, at spillways, and to define other grades as needed.

8. Within a vehicular use area, one (1) canopy tree is required for each four (4) motor vehicle parking spaces LUC 3.7.2.3 Additional trees are required. The canopy trees must be evenly distributed throughout the vehicular use area. Every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk).

9. An unpaved planting area, which is a minimum of thirty-four (34) square feet in area and four (4) feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree, except allowed per Development Standard 2-06.3.3. Verify square footage of planters for trees within vehicle us area.

10. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-06.5.4.A & DS 2-06.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation and location where any sensors that control the irrigation system will be placed.

11. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan.

12. Additional comments may apply.
07/19/2012 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

PROJECT: DP12-0094
4930 N 1st Ave.
Development Package

TRANSMITTAL DATE: 07/23/12

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. DS 2-01.2.5: Revise the development package document to include the correct CDRC approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. The link to the stamp can be found here: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp

2. DS 2-01.3.3 This project has been assigned case number DP12-0094. Place this case number near the lower right corner of all sheets.

3. DS 2-01.3.7.A.4 Revise general note #3 to read as follows: "The proposed use of this property is Medical Service - Outpatient "29", subject to: Sec. 3.5.4.8.B."

4. DS 2-01.3.7.A.6.b Provide a general note indicating that this project has been designed to meet the criteria of the following overlay zones: Sec. 2.8.3, Major Street And Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone and Sec.2.8.2, Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ).

Note this project cannot be approved until the special application for the scenic corridor overlay has been completed and approved. Add a note indicating the date of approval, case number and any conditions of approval. Place the scenic overlay case number (T12SAxxxxx) near the lower right corner of all sheets.

5. DS 2-01.3.8.B Per the final plat there is an 8' utility easement along the east property line, clearly indicate on the plan. Provide recording information for the utility easement and the 70' access easement indicated on the plan.

6. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5 Clearly indicate the width of all two way PAALs. Minimum width is 24'. Near the south entrance from the edge of the parallel parking space to the island curb does not appear to be 24', clarify. Indicate the width of the PAAL for the southern parking spaces.

7. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.a On detail E/C3 indicate the location of the provided wheel stops, max. 2'-6" from the front of the parking space.

8. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Please provide a plan view detail of the proposed short term bicycle parking spaces. Single rack spaces placed in a row will allow a minimum of seventy -two (72) inch length per bicycle parking space and a minimum of forty-eight (48) inches between outer spaces of racks. The short term bicycle rack cannot be any closer than 30" to an adjacent wall. A five (5) foot wide access aisle measured from the front or rear of the seventy-two (72) inch long parking space will be provided beside each row.

Please provide a dimensioned detail for long term and short term bicycle parking racks and enclosures.

Please provide a plan view detail of the proposed long term bicycle parking spaces. A five (5) foot wide access aisle measured from the front or rear of the seventy-two (72) inch long parking space will be provided beside each row.

9. DS 2-01.3.9.Q Provide overall dimensions for the footprint of the building on the plan.
Please darken the lines of the building footprint for clarity purposes.

10. DS 2-01.3.9.R The section of the pedestrian circulation path at the west end of the crosswalk between the two islands is required to be constructed of concrete.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961

C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\DP12-0094.doc
07/26/2012 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
07/26/2012 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC REVIEW Denied SHEET C1
1. Provide 2' deep detectable warning strips at both ends of the marked crossing as required by ICC A117.1, Sections 406.12, 13 and 14.
2. Provide a large scale detail of the concrete ramp and stairs up to the front entrance patio. Show all accessibility requirements such as dimensions, grade elevations, handrails, slope percentages, risers, treads and landings.
a. Provide a handrail elevation.
3. As per ICC A117.1, Section 406, the flared sides of the curb ramp have a maxium slope of 1:10. Please draw in correct angle for this slope.
4. Reference the large scale detail E/C3 from the accessible parking space configuration.
SHEET C3
5. At Detail "M", provide handrails on both sides of the stairs.
a. Provide 2 handrail elevations as required.
6. At Detail "E":
a. Indicate 2% maximum slope in all directions for the accessible parking and aisle surface areas.
b. Show ramp with flared sides at 1:10 maxium slope
c. Delete the curb return.
d. Delete the detectable warning strip, not required.
END OF REVIEW
07/27/2012 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
07/30/2012 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Provide recordation information for all easements and delineate the easements on the site plan.
Provide a letter or other communication from the owner of the Walgreens parcel indicating permission to access the solid waste enclosure from that site.
Provide discussion of the discharge that is expected at the base of the fill slope adjacent to the south property line. Demonstrate there will be no adverse impact to the Walgreens site.
Environmental Services requests the inclusion of recycling facilities along with the solid waste disposal. Please consider providing a recycling container enclosure.
07/31/2012 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
08/01/2012 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied The review has been completed. Please include 3 rolled sets of the revised drawings along with other required items with the resubmittal of these plans.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
08/16/2012 FERNE RODRIGUEZ OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed