Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - SITE
Permit Number - DP12-0014
Review Name: REVISION - SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
02/15/2013 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
02/25/2013 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Ensure that all Zoning & Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. |
02/25/2013 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: O'Reilly Auto Parts - 51 S. Pantano Road Development Package DP12-0014 (Revision) TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 25, 2013 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.a As a vehicle parking space has been removed the vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. The plan shows 28 provided and only 27 are shown. 2. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R The striped area shown between the two (2) vehicle parking spaces is required to be a sidewalk, physically separated from the parking spaces. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-00014 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. |
02/26/2013 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
03/11/2013 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
03/11/2013 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The flared sides of the ramp is to have a slope of 1:10 as per detail 13/C4. Please indicate this configuration on the site plan. a. Flared sides are generally provided where there is cross pedestrian traffic over the ramp. A better solution for this ramp would be to omit the flared sides and provide a return curb. END OF REVIEW |
03/14/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed |