Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUB - SITE/GRADING ALL
Permit Number - DP12-0014
Review Name: RESUB - SITE/GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/08/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: O'Reilly Auto Parts - 51 S. Pantano Road Development Package DP12-0014 (3rd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 8, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development package. If, at the end of that time, the development package has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is January 30, 2013. The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0: 1. Zoning acknowledges that this comment was shown as addressed on the last submittal. The area of this easement located under the building will need to be abandoned prior to approval of the development package. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B There is an "EXISTING 10' WIDE ELECTIRC EASEMENT" shown along the north side of the adjacent parcel, provide the recordation information, docket & page or sequence number, on the plan. 2. This comment will need to be addressed prior to approval of the development package. The lot split will need to be processed through the City of Tucson Development Services. D.S. 2-01.3.9.E As it appears that a lot split is proposed. The lot split will need to be completed prior to approval of the Development Package. A separate lot split application is required. 3. This comment was not addressed correctly. The SVT's need to be shown on the site plan and meet the requirements of D.S. 3-01.5.0 D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.2 Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 4. This comment will need to be addressed prior to approval of the development package. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H As the northern most PAAL is located on the proposed adjacent property some type of cross access agreement or easement is required. Provide a copy of the recorded document with your next submittal. 5. This comment was not addressed. Provide a clear dimension that shows that the fifteen (15) foot clearance is met. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H Keynote 14 references "PARKING LOT LIGHTING", provide a detail that shows how the requirements of LUC Section 3.3.6.5.B are met. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-00014 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package, approved lot split documents, recorded cross access agreement or easement. |
| 10/12/2012 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/15/2012 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | October 18, 2012 DP12-0014 1. The site plan shows an existing electric easement within the footprint of the building. Provide a letter from the Tucson Electric Power consenting to the construction of the building within its easement or provide recordation information for the abandonment of the easement. 2. Provide sight visibility triangles for each driveway entrance to the site for both existing and future curb locations based on the standard sections. The SVTs must be clearly drawn and labeled on the site plan and grading plan. Include SVTs for both existing and future right-of-way conditions. The SVT's must meet the requirements of DS 3-01 and should be presented on the site and grading plan views. (DS 2-01.3.9.J.) 3. Show locations of driveways on adjacent parcels along with dimensions between driveway locations. Per the Transportation Access Management Guidelines of the City of Tucson the minimum distance between driveway pavement edges is 80 feet. Per the TAMGs curb returns are required for each entrance. Provide a letter or email from Jose Ortiz for any exceptions. It appears the distance between the south driveway and the driveway on the adjacent property is less than 80 feet. 4. Check the proposed grades on the grading plan to make sure they are consistent. Show grading limits as well. 5. Show the proposed water harvesting tank on the site and grading plans. Please contact me at loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov if you have any questions |
| 10/22/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | The 5/8" water meters for irrigation and for water service to the building can be approved but the 5/8" water service pipe to the building is undersized. The smallest allowable water service pipe for a building is ¾" (Section 610.8, UPC 2006) however the plumbing engineer has determined that a 1" pipe is required for this building. In addition, Tucson Water has determined that the water pressure range for this address is 80 to 87 PSI which will require the addition of a pressure regulator after the water meter. Revise the size of the water service pipe to the building on the site utility plan to coordinate with the plumbing design and note that a pressure regulator is required. [Previous comment: Comment not addressed. Verify that the proposed ¾" tap of the water main for use with the 1" and the ¾" water meters is acceptable to Tucson Water.] |
| 10/26/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Landscape plan shall be in the same graphic scale to decipher the location of individual plants. 2. A Native Plant Inventory shall contain the following elements: a. An aerial photograph, taken within a maximum of three (3) years of submittal, at a minimum scale of 1" = 60' showing the site's boundaries, the locations of all Protected Native Plants within those boundaries, and the \plants' identification numbers keyed to the inventory list in Sec. 2- 15.3.1.A.2. Any aerial photograph submitted, which was taken more than one (1) year prior to submittal, shall be accompanied by a letter stating that the site is substantially unchanged from the date of the aerial photograph. b. Landscape and NPP plans shall include a summary of plants required for mitigation and show their site location on the landscape plans. Show the total PIP, TOS, required mitigation for each species. DS 2-15.3.4.B. c. It appears that a lot split is proposed (per Zoning comments). The lot split will need to be completed prior to approval of the Development Package. D.S. 2-01.3.9.E . A separate lot application is required. Protected Native Plants on proposed adjacent lots can not be credited to adjoining parcels. Revise plan as necessary. 3. The Water Harvesting Plan shall detail the landscape water demand and the harvested water supply needed to meet 50 percent of landscape demand DS 10-03.4.0. Additional information is necessary to accurately review plan 4. Provide additional water budget data, along with the background data and assumptions used to develop it. This water budget format is available to applicants as an Excel spreadsheet @ cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/dsd/water_budget_spreadsheet.xls. 5. Ensure that all Zoning comments and concerns are addressed. 6. Additional comments may apply. |
| 10/26/2012 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | |
| 10/26/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Landscape plan shall be in the same graphic scale to decipher the location of individual plants. 2. A Native Plant Inventory shall contain the following elements: a. An aerial photograph, taken within a maximum of three (3) years of submittal, at a minimum scale of 1" = 60' showing the site's boundaries, the locations of all Protected Native Plants within those boundaries, and the \plants' identification numbers keyed to the inventory list in Sec. 2- 15.3.1.A.2. Any aerial photograph submitted, which was taken more than one (1) year prior to submittal, shall be accompanied by a letter stating that the site is substantially unchanged from the date of the aerial photograph. b. Landscape and NPP plans shall include a summary of plants required for mitigation and show their site location on the landscape plans. Show the total PIP, TOS, required mitigation for each species. DS 2-15.3.4.B. c. It appears that a lot split is proposed (per Zoning comments). The lot split will need to be completed prior to approval of the Development Package. D.S. 2-01.3.9.E . A separate lot application is required. Protected Native Plants on proposed adjacent lots can not be credited to adjoining parcels. Revise plan as necessary. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/09/2012 | SHANAE POWELL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |