Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUB - SITE/GRADING ALL
Permit Number - DP12-0014
Review Name: RESUB - SITE/GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/08/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/08/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: O'Reilly Auto Parts - 51 S. Pantano Road Development Package DP12-0014 (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 8, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development package. If, at the end of that time, the development package has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is January 30, 2013. The following comments are based on Development Package Submittal Requirements: 1. Comment Addressed. The drawing order is not correct. The site plan should follow the cover sheet, grading plan should follow the site plan, detail sheet(s) should follow the grading plan, utility plan should follow the detail sheet(s). 2. Comment Addressed. Remove the Alta survey from the development package as it is not a required document. 3. This comment was not addressed. The same "GENERAL NOTES" are duplicated on sheets 2 & 3. There are "GENERAL NOTES" duplicated on the site and grading plans. These general notes should be on either the cover sheet or on a separate general not sheet. They do not need to be duplicated on each sheet. 4. Comment Addressed. The "SITE DATE TABLE" Shown on sheet C3 should be shown on the cover sheet. The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0: 1. Comment Addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.2.E Provide the number of pages, 1 of 9, 2 of 9, etc on each sheet. 2. Comment Addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the following relevant case numbers adjacent to the title block on each sheet; DP12-0014. 3. This comment was not addressed correctly. The project location map should be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile and the section corners identified on the map. The provided "VICINITY MAP" is un-readable. D.S. 2-01.3.4 Provide a project-location map that meets the following requirements; The project-location map shall cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile, and provide the following information. A. Show the subject property approximately centered within the one (1) square mile area. B. Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property. C. Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 4. Comment Addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.1 Sheet C1 General Note 1 remove the "GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONE" as the LUC does not reference "GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONE" 5. Comment Addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.2 Sheet C1 General Note 2 remove the reference to the "PARENT SITE". 6. Comment Addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the Land Use Code. List all Land Use Code sections each proposed use is subject to. That said the existing use should be listed as "VACANT", the proposed use should be listed as "GENERAL MERCHANDISE SALES "28", SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.9.2.C". 7. Comment Addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.6.b Provide a general note on sheet 1 stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA: SEC. 2.8.3, MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE" 8. Comment Addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Per LUC Section 3.2.3.1.C, Development Designator "28" Lot Coverage is not applicable. Provide a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) that meets the requirements of LUC Section 3.2.11. 9. Comment Addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B There is an "EXISTING 10' WIDE ELECTIRC EASEMENT" shown along the north side of the adjacent parcel, provide the recordation information, docket & page or sequence number, on the plan. 10. Comment Addressed. This comment will need to be addressed prior to approval of the development package. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B There is an "EXISTING 10' WIDE ELECTIRC EASEMENT DOCKET 3683 PAGE 137" shown on the plan that runs under the proposed building. This easement will need to be abandoned prior to approval of the development package. Provide the approved abandonment documents with your next submittal. 11. Zoning was not able to find a dimension for the future curb along Pantano Road. D.S. 2-01.3.8.C Provide dimensions for the location of the existing curbs, existing sidewalks, and future curbs within the right-of-way (ROW) along Pantano Road. 12. This comment will need to be addressed prior to approval of the development package. D.S. 2-01.3.9.E As it appears that a lot split is proposed. The lot split will need to be completed prior to approval of the Development Package. A separate lot split application is required. 13. Comment Addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.9.F All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 14. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.2 Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 15. This comment was not addressed. The entire north edge of the northern PAAL will need some type of barrier. The limits of paving called out under Key note 15 do not meet the requirements of LUC Section 3.3.6.8.A. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H Per LUC Section 3.3.6.8.A Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas or unpaved areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. That said the parking area access lane (PAAL) along the north side of the property requires some type of barrier to prevent vehicles from accessing the unimproved portions of the site. 16. This comment will need to be addressed prior to approval of the development package. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H As the northern most PAAL is located on the proposed adjacent property some type of cross access agreement or easement is required. Provide a copy of the recorded document with your next submittal. 17. Provide a clear dimension that shows that the fifteen (15) fool clearance is met. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H Keynote 14 references "PARKING LOT LIGHTING", provide a detail that shows how the requirements of LUC Section 3.3.6.5.B are met. 18. Comment Addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Provide a vehicle parking calculations that includes the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled on the first sheet. 19. Comment Addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. The details shall provide a dimension for the wheel stop curbing shown on the plans. This dimension shall meet the requirements of LUC Section 3.3.6.8.C. 20. Comment Addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a There are two proposed vehicle parking spaces shown in front of the "TRASH PAD". These spaces may not be located in front of the trash pad. 21. Comment Addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Per LUC Section 3.3.6.8.A Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas or unpaved areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. That said the vehicle parking spaces shown along the west side of the property require wheel stops to prevent them from overhanging the required landscape area. 22. Comment Addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a It appears that the sidewalk proposed west of the vehicle parking spaces is less than 6'-6" wide. Provide wheel stops for the vehicle parking spaces. 23. Comment Addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Provide a detail for a standard vehicle parking space that includes wheel stops. 24. Comment Addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.c Provide a loading space calculation on the plan. This calculation should show "LOADING SPACES REQUIRED = 0, LOADING SPACES PROVIDED = 0. 25. Comment Addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Provide a Short & Long Term bicycle parking calculation on the plan. Per LUC Section 3.3.8.2.B the required number of Short-Term bicycle parking spaces is two (2) and the required number of Long-Term bicycle parking spaces is two (2). 26. Comment Addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Provide a detail for both Short & Long Term bicycle parking that clearly shows how the following LUC Sections are met; LUC 3.3.9.2., .3 & .4. 27. Comment Addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O The street perimeter yard setback shown along Pantano Road is not shown correctly. Clearly indicate the back of future curb on the plan and provide a dimension from the back of future curb to the proposed building on the plan. 28. Comment Addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R Provide a clear width dimension from the proposed bollards to the proposed pop outs shown on the proposed building. Per D.S. 2-08.5.1.A the minimum width is four (4) feet. 29. Comment Addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.9.X It does not appear that the minimum street landscape buffer, ten (10) feet, is provided, see Landscape review comments. 30. Comment Addressed. Provide the CDRC stamp on all sheets of the development package. This stamp can be found at the following web site "http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp" If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-00014 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package, approved lot split documents, recorded cross access agreement or easement. |
| 08/28/2012 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Detail 13/4 is non-compliant. Please provide a curb ramp as per requirements of ICC A117.1, Section 406. a. Provide detectable warning strips as required by Section 406.12. 2. The dectectable warning strips are not indicated at either end of the marked crossing on any of your site plans. Please show the detectable warning strips at both ends of the marked crossing as required by 406.12, 13 and/or 14. a. Please show them also on all large scale details. 3. Move the middle parking lot pensula one parking space to the South so as to provide a more direct accessible route path accross the PAAL. END OF REVIEW |
| 08/29/2012 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a more complete drainage statement, showing how the retention volume will be achieved in the landscaping swales. 2. Provide site conditions for the site including conditions extending 50 feet outside of each property line and extending across Pantano Road. This requirement is necessary to demonstrate the site development will fit with existing surrounding conditions. (DS2-01.3.8) 3. The site plan shows an existing electric easement within the footprint of the building. Provide a letter from the Tucson Electric Power consenting to the construction of the building within its easement or provide recordation information for the vacation of the easement. 4. Provide sight visibility triangles for each driveway entrance to the site for both existing and future curb locations based on the standard sections. The SVTs must be clearly drawn and labeled on the site plan and grading plan. Include SVTs for both existing and future right-of-way conditions. (DS 2-01.3.9.J.) 5. Clearly show the size, depth and design of the water harvesting/retention areas with enough detail to demonstrate the required volume is provided. Make sure the designs on the grading plans and the landscape plans are consistent. Provide all of the information required by DS2-01.3.9.N. 6. Provide dimensions for the solid waste enclosure to ensure that it complies with DS 6-01 as amended April 4, 2011. The enclosure also requires steel bollards on the sides of the enclosure. If you don't have a copy of this amended version, contact me for a link to an online version. 7. Show locations of driveways on adjacent parcels along with dimensions between driveway locations. Per the Transportation Access Management Guidelines of the City of Tucson the minimum distance between driveways from an arterial roadway is 80 feet. Per the TAMGs curb returns are required for each entrance. Provide a letter or email from Jose Ortiz for any exceptions. 8. Show complete maneuverability to and from the solid waste enclosure location in accordance with DS 6-01. The details provided show access to the service area but don't show how the container will be serviced. If roll-out service is proposed, provide a letter from the waste hauler and statement that the container will be of sufficient capacity to meet the needs of the store. 9. Additional comments may be forthcoming based on the responses to these comments. |
| 08/31/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | The Native Plant Inventory Methodology is based upon a Native Plant Inventory of all Protected Native Plants per Development Standard 2-15.3.1. Revise plan as necessary to comply with the development standard.. |
| 08/31/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Landscape plan review: 1. The Native Plant Inventory Methodology is based upon a Native Plant Inventory of all Protected Native Plants per Development Standard 2-15.3.1. Revise plan as necessary to comply with the development standard.. 2. The site, grading and landscape plans must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site, and grading plans are reflected on the landscape plan. Indentify screening elements 3. Additional comments may apply Water Harvesting plan comments: 1. Site Water Budget shall be submitted with all applications for commercial developments at which landscaping is required The plan shall detail the landscape water demand and the harvested water supply needed to meet 50 percent of landscape demand DS 10-03.4.0 " A water budget format is shown in Exhibit A, along with the background data and assumptions used to develop it. This water budget format is available to applicants as an Excel spreadsheet @ http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/What_s_New/what_s_new.html>. " Applicants may use this water budget format to enter site-specific data to develop their Site Water Budget. Alternatively, applicants may develop their own Site Water Budget format. Whichever format is used, the submitted Site Water Budget shall incorporate and provide the following information: " Water Demand. Applicants shall use plant water demand categories and data provided in Exhibit A unless alternative assumptions are provided and satisfactorily justified. " Water Supply. Applicants shall use the effective monthly rainfall assumptions shown in Exhibit A unless alternative assumptions are provided and satisfactorily justified. " Output. Output of the Site Water Budget shall include calculations showing how 50 percent of landscape water demand as an average across the site will be met using harvested rainwater, and shall include assumptions and supporting calculations as necessary to document these outputs. Output of the Site Water Budget shall include total water demand and rainwater supply calculations for each Water Harvesting Infiltration Area at the site. " For the containment system actively serving each WHIA: " Tank Identifier " Percent of annual plant water demand provided by this tank to the WHIA " Label tank as delivering water by gravity flow or pump " Use arrows to indicate flow path water will take from source to WHIA " Show additional piping, pump and other infrastructure needed to store, overflow, and convey water to WHIA 2. Irrigation requierments: " Irrigation control. Irrigation systems shall be fitted with irrigation controllers and shall be capable of monitoring and responding to plant water needs through the use of soil moisture gauges, tensiometers, weather stations and/or evapotranspiration data. The irrigation technology chosen should be capable of preventing the irrigation system from running if sufficient soil moisture is present to support the vegetation. All systems shall include rain shut-off devices. Instruments shall be correctly placed to ensure plants are kept healthy using a combination of harvested and non-harvested water and to ensure the stated water-saving goal of the Ordinance is met. " Irrigation timers, where used, shall be used in conjunction with other irrigation controls to ensure compliance with the provisions of this development standard. " Show location where any sensors that control the irrigation system will be placed 3. Add the following notes to the Rainwater Harvesting Plan: 10-03.6.1 Maintenance: " MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS: All Passive and Active Water Harvesting System components, Water Harvesting Infiltration Areas, and other site improvements necessary for the water harvesting system to function properly, should be regularly inspected and maintained. The following maintenance requirements should be addressed on the Implementation Plan. " Passive Systems. In addition to requirements for all systems, to ensure proper functioning of Passive Water Harvesting Systems, periodically inspect and maintain Sub-watershed surfaces and infrastructure associated with the system such as French drains, spillways, scuppers and other elements. Repair and correct problems as needed. " Monitoring of water use and related information at the site shall be the responsibility of the property owner. " Monitoring is required to verify compliance with the approved Water Harvesting Implementation Plan. " Monitoring data shall be compiled, along with other necessary information, into an annual report to be submitted to the City by January 30 of each year per DS 10-3.7.1. |
| 08/31/2012 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | FROM: Zelin Canchola TDOT Traffic Engineering PROJECT: O'Rielly Auto Parts Development Package DP12-0014 Based on Transportation Access Management Guidlines for the City of Tucson, Both driveways need minimum curb return radius Driveway to Arterial =25 feet. Tabel 5.2 Access management guidelines. Show sight visibility Triangles for both driveways. |
| 08/31/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Comment not addressed. Verify that the proposed ¾" tap of the water main for use with the 1" and the ¾" water meters is acceptable to Tucson Water. |