Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP12-0014
Parcel: 13413057W

Address:
51 S PANTANO RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - DP12-0014
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/01/2012 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied Please include existing fire hydrant location(s), with dimensions to property lines. Per C.O.T. amendments to the 2006 IFC, a hydrant must be within 300' of all parts of the building (as the hose lays). A new hydrant or fire sprinklers may be required.
02/01/2012 CAGUILA1 ADA REVIEW Passed
02/03/2012 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Denied SHEET C3
1. At note 8, delete the detail 207 reference and insert ICC A117.1, Section 406, Curb Ramp. Detail 207 is a DOT detail to be used for public right of way accessibility construction only.
a. In lieu of flared side which required a minimum slope of 1:10, please consider a turn back curb ramp instead.
b. Please provide a large scale detail of all different types of ramps showing dimensions, slopes, elevations, detectable warnings as required and etc.
2. Please provide detectable warning strips at both ends of the marked crossing as per ICC A117.1, Sections 406.12 and 406.14.
3. Please provide a large scale detail of the accessible parking layout showing all required accessible dimensions, slopes, signage, aisles, access to accessible route and markings.
a. The signage is to be positioned down the center of each accessible parking space.
b. Please define the transition from the accessible parking aisle to the accessible route.
c. One accessible parking space must be "Van Accessible". Please identify which one.
SHEET C5
4. Detail 7:
a. The dimension to the bottom of the main sign is to be 7'-0": as per COT DOT directive.
b. Please include the "Van Accessible" sign.
END OF REVIEW
02/22/2012 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. A street landscape border, per Sec. 3.7.2.4 of the LUC, is a landscape area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet, running the full length of the street property line(s) bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress. Dimension street landscape borders.

2. Fifty (50) percent or more of the street landscape border area must have shrubs and vegetative ground cover per LUC 3.7.2.4.

3. Indicate square footage of all landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g.

4. A 30" continuous screen along street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Identify screening elements.

5. The screening requirement is in addition to the landscape requirement.

6. Within a vehicular use area, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 4 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.

7. Include NPP plan with subsequent submittal that indicates the disposition and identifies Protected Native Plants on site and within public Right of Way or Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property. The Application for Exception can be found @ http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/dsd/NPPOapp.pdf

8. Add note to landscape plan: The area between the right-of-way line and sidewalk and the area between the sidewalk and the curb, if not covered with vegetation, shall be covered with an appropriate inorganic ground cover, such as decomposed granite.

9. DS 10-03.0 COMMERCIAL RAINWATER HARVESTING applies to all commercial development plans submitted after June 1, 2010. Provide Rainwater Harvesting Plan. .

10. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan.

11. Additional comments may apply.
02/22/2012 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied Include NPP plan with subsequent submittal that indicates the disposition and identifies Protected Native Plants on site and within public Right of Way or Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property. The Application for Exception can be found @ http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/dsd/NPPOapp.pdf
02/27/2012 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: O'Reilly Auto Parts - 51 S. Pantano Road
Development Package
DP12-0014

TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 28, 2012

DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development package. If, at the end of that time, the development package has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is January 30, 2013.

The following comments are based on Development Package Submittal Requirements:

1. The drawing order is not correct. The site plan should follow the cover sheet, grading plan should follow the site plan, detail sheet(s) should follow the grading plan, utility plan should follow the detail sheet(s).

2. Remove the Alta survey from the development package as it is not a required document.

3. There are "GENERAL NOTES" duplicated on the site and grading plans. These general notes should be on either the cover sheet or on a separate general not sheet. They do not need to be duplicated on each sheet.

4. The "SITE DATE TABLE" Shown on sheet C3 should be shown on the cover sheet.

The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0:

1. D.S. 2-01.3.2.E Provide the number of pages, 1 of 9, 2 of 9, etc on each sheet.

2. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the following relevant case numbers adjacent to the title block on each sheet; DP12-0014.

3. D.S. 2-01.3.4 Provide a project-location map that meets the following requirements;
The project-location map shall cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a
minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile, and provide the following information.
A. Show the subject property approximately centered within the one (1) square mile area.
B. Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property.
C. Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled.

4. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.1 Sheet C1 General Note 1 remove the "GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONE" as the LUC does not reference "GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONE"

5. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.2 Sheet C1 General Note 2 remove the reference to the "PARENT SITE".

6. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the Land Use Code. List all Land Use Code sections each proposed use is subject to. That said the existing use should be listed as "VACANT", the proposed use should be listed as "GENERAL MERCHANDISE SALES "28", SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.9.2.C".

7. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.6.b Provide a general note on sheet 1 stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA: SEC. 2.8.3, MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE"

8. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Per LUC Section 3.2.3.1.C, Development Designator "28" Lot Coverage is not applicable. Provide a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) that meets the requirements of LUC Section 3.2.11.

9. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B There is an "EXISTING 10' WIDE ELECTIRC EASEMENT" shown along the north side of the adjacent parcel, provide the recordation information, docket & page or sequence number, on the plan.

10. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B There is an "EXISTING 10' WIDE ELECTIRC EASEMENT DOCKET 3683 PAGE 137" shown on the plan that runs under the proposed building. This easement will need to be abandoned prior to approval of the development package. Provide the approved abandonment documents with your next submittal.

11. D.S. 2-01.3.8.C Provide dimensions for the location of the existing curbs, existing sidewalks, and future curbs within the right-of-way (ROW) along Pantano Road.

12. D.S. 2-01.3.9.E As it appears that a lot split is proposed. The lot split will need to be completed prior to approval of the Development Package. A separate lot split application is required.

13. D.S. 2-01.3.9.F All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined.

14. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.2 Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

15. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H Per LUC Section 3.3.6.8.A Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas or unpaved areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. That said the parking area access lane (PAAL) along the north side of the property requires some type of barrier to prevent vehicles from accessing the unimproved portions of the site.

16. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H As the northern most PAAL is located on the proposed adjacent property some type of cross access agreement or easement is required. Provide a copy of the recorded document with your next submittal.

17. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H Keynote 14 references "PARKING LOT LIGHTING", provide a detail that shows how the requirements of LUC Section 3.3.6.5.B are met.

18. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Provide a vehicle parking calculations that includes the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled on the first sheet.

19. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. The details shall provide a dimension for the wheel stop curbing shown on the plans. This dimension shall meet the requirements of LUC Section 3.3.6.8.C.

20. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a There are two proposed vehicle parking spaces shown in front of the "TRASH PAD". These spaces may not be located in front of the trash pad.

21. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Per LUC Section 3.3.6.8.A Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas or unpaved areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. That said the vehicle parking spaces shown along the west side of the property require wheel stops to prevent them from overhanging the required landscape area.

22. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a It appears that the sidewalk proposed west of the vehicle parking spaces is less than 6'-6" wide. Provide wheel stops for the vehicle parking spaces.

23. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Provide a detail for a standard vehicle parking space that includes wheel stops.

24. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.c Provide a loading space calculation on the plan. This calculation should show "LOADING SPACES REQUIRED = 0, LOADING SPACES PROVIDED = 0.

25. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Provide a Short & Long Term bicycle parking calculation on the plan. Per LUC Section 3.3.8.2.B the required number of Short-Term bicycle parking spaces is two (2) and the required number of Long-Term bicycle parking spaces is two (2).

26. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Provide a detail for both Short & Long Term bicycle parking that clearly shows how the following LUC Sections are met; LUC 3.3.9.2., .3 & .4.

27. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O The street perimeter yard setback shown along Pantano Road is not shown correctly. Clearly indicate the back of future curb on the plan and provide a dimension from the back of future curb to the proposed building on the plan.

28. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R Provide a clear width dimension from the proposed bollards to the proposed pop outs shown on the proposed building. Per D.S. 2-08.5.1.A the minimum width is four (4) feet.

29. D.S. 2-01.3.9.X It does not appear that the minimum street landscape buffer, ten (10) feet, is provided, see Landscape review comments.

30. Provide the CDRC stamp on all sheets of the development package. This stamp can be found at the following web site "http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp"

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com

Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-00014

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package, approved lot split documents, recorded cross access agreement or easement.
02/28/2012 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied 1. Provide a complete drainage report showing how the project complies with the retention and detention requirements of the City of Tucson. See the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management in Tucson Arizona and the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual for detailed instructions and requirements.
2. The Stormwater Runoff Notes indicate no detention is required. Demonstrate that no adverse impact will be caused by this development in accordance with section 14.1 of the Standards Manual.
3. If the drainage report doesn't indicate that floodplain conditions exist on the project site, remove the note indicating a floodplain use permit will be required. (DS 2-01.3.7.B.2)
4. Provide site conditions for the site including conditions extending 50 feet outside of each property line and extending across Pantano Road. (DS2-01.3.8)
5. The site plan shows an existing electric easement within the footprint of the building. Provide a letter from the Tucson Electric Power consenting to the construction of the building within its easement.
6. Provide the floodplain information for the drainage channel along the south boundary of the project, including all of the information required by DS 2-01.3.8.I.
7. Provide sight visibility triangles for each driveway entrance to the site for both existing and future curb locations based on the standard sections. (DS 2-01.3.9.J.)
8. Show all drainage information required by DS 2-01.3.9.N. based on the results of the drainage study required above.
9. Provide dimensions for the solid waste enclosure to ensure that it complies with DS 6-01 as amended April 4, 2011. If you don't have a copy of this amended version, contact me for a link to an online version.
10. Show locations of driveways on adjacent parcels along with dimensions between driveway locations. Per the Transportation Access Management Guidelines of the City of Tucson the minimum distance between driveways from an arterial roadway is 80 feet. Per the TAMGs curb returns are required for each entrance. Provide a letter or email from Jose Ortiz for any exceptions.
11. Show complete maneuverability to and from the solid waste enclosure location in accordance with DS 6-01.
12. Additional comments may be forthcoming based on the responses to these comments.
03/01/2012 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Verify that the proposed ¾" tap of the water main for use with the 1" and the ¾" water meters is acceptable to Tucson Water.
03/08/2012 JOSE ORTIZ COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied March 12, 2012
ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP12-0014
PROJECT NAME: O'Reilly Auto Parts
PROJECT ADDRESS: 51 S. Pantano Road
PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer

Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Package (DP); therefore a revised DP is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plans. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed.

1. The access points shall have 25' radius curb returns. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6). The southern access driveway needs to be modified to include curb returns.

2. Dimension the width of all ingress/egress points (Tucson City Code, Chapter 25, section 39 & 40)

3. Label the right of way line as existing and/or future.

4. Show and label both existing and future Sight Visibility Triangles SVTs (DS 2-03.2.4.M). If the existing and future SVTs are the same then label as both existing and future.

5. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.

6. To avoid left turning vehicular conflicts within the Pantano Road two-way left turn lane the northern proposed driveway will be restricted to right in/right out therefore left in and left outs will not be permitted for the northern driveway.

7. The proposed Circle K development at Broadway and Pantano is considering design options for off-site improvements that will allow for full access at the proposed northern driveway. Contact Erin Harris of STAR Consulting (Phone (520) 425-3795) to coordinate the two developments in an effort to ensure full access from the northern driveway.


If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-6730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
03/16/2012 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed