Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP12-0007
Parcel: 12709016A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - DP12-0007
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/17/2012 FRODRIG2 ADA REVIEW Passed
01/18/2012 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied A-2 occupancy (proposed restaurant) appaers to have an occupant load over 100 (4600 sq. ft/15, per table 1004.1.1, 2006 IBC), which would require fire sprinklers. Either show proposed fire line location or show occupant load calculations indicating occupant load under 100.
01/23/2012 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Denied SHEET C1
1. Zoning requires only 1 access to each public right of way. There are three shown on this plan to the Craycroft right of way, two of them may be eliminated.
2. Insure all accessible route slopes comply with ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 403.3.
3. Relocate one of the two "Van Accessible" parking spaces located in from of the existing Major Building to the North side of Pad-1.
4. Please provide large scale details of all the different types of curb and sidewalks ramps shown on this plan. Please show all accessible requirements such as dimensions, slopes, detectable warnings as required, curbs, marked crossings as required and accessible routes.
5. The side walk located just off the South east corner of the existing Major Building leading to the parking lot is not required to be accessible. It does not appear to have an accessible requirement nor does it serve a particular function. Please delete the ramp and detectable warning strip and maintain a 6" high curb at the end of the walk.
SHEET C2
6. At details 2, 3 and 4:
a. The truncated dome warning note referencing ADAAG is not applicable for this project. Accessibility for this project is the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC/ANSI 117.1. Detectable warnings strips are not required at the accessible parking aisles. Please delete the ADAAG reference.
b. For the asterick shown please reference ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 502.5; surface slopes shall be no more than 1:48 for accessible parking and aisle areas.
7. At details 1 and 2, the South end of the marked crossing connecting the Major Building to the Pad-1 Building, the detectable warning strip is to be as wide as the marked crossing as per ICC/ANSI 117.1, Sectiion 406.12.
SHEET 3 OF 13
8. Reference Comment 1: It may be desirable to delete detail 11.
END OF REVIEW
01/26/2012 LEERAY HANLY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
01/30/2012 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approved
01/30/2012 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
01/30/2012 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: January 30, 2012
SUBJECT: NEC Broadway and Craycroft Retail Center Development Plan Package
TO: Dennis Barcena
LOCATION: 5545 E Broadway Blvd, T14S R14E 12 Ward 6
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP12-0007


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package, Drainage Statement (Cypress Civil Development, 28DEC11), Geotechnical Report (Terracon, 09DEC11), and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Cypress Civil Development, 06JAN12). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under Development Standard 2-01. All comments reflect Site Plan, Grading Plan and SWPPP review. The following items need to be addressed:


SITE PLAN: It is recommended that Development Standard 2-01 "Development Package" be reviewed prior to resubmittal. DS Sec.2-02 no longer exists and all reviews fall under DS Sec.2-01 for Development Package. The standard has changes that must be incorporated into the plan sheets for review and approval.

1) DS Sec.2-01.2.4: Revise the plan sheets to include the title block in the lower right quadrant of each sheet.

2) DS Sec.2-01.2.5: Revise the development plan document to include the correct CDRC approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. The link to the stamp can be found here: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp

3) DS Sec.2-01.3.2: The corrected title block shall include a brief legal description and the page number and number of pages within the set.

4) DS Sec.2-01.3.3: The relevant Development Plan Package number (DP12-0007) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets.

5) DS Sec.2-01.3.5: Revise the plan set to include a sheet index on the first sheet listing the names of each sheet included in the development plan package; this is to also include the SWPPP Exhibit.

6) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.F: Revise the plan set to label all existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site. Provide the Improvement Plan reference Number in plan view.

7) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project.

8) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Provide written approval from both TDOT and Real Estate Departments for the proposed pedestrian access ramp with handrail within the public right-of-way of Craycroft Road. Provide all Real Estate conditions on the development plan document, i.e. Temporary Revocable Easement with conditions.

9) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.3: Revise the development plan document to clearly label the number of scuppers proposed for collecting Stormwater runoff. The architectural sheets and civil sheets must match with the proposed number of scuppers as labeled.

10) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.T: Revise the development plan document to provide a Refuse Enclosure Detail to meet the minimum requirements of DS Sec.6-01.5.2. Verify that each container has a clear 10'x10' area plus a 1-foot dimension from the enclosure wall to the required bollards.

11) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.T: Revise the development plan document to verify the maximum backup dimensions fort he proposed refuse container location. Per DS Sec.6-01.5.3.F a maximum backup distance for collection vehicles shall be 80-feet measured from the front of the collection vehicle, per the proposed plan it appears that the vehicle will have to backup a distance great than the allowed maximum, verify.


SWPPP: The proposed SWPPP meets the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). However the SWPPP Exhibit should be part of the Development Plan package. All site, grading, landscaping and SWPPP exhibits are required to be in the submittal. Revise the sheet count and the sheet index to reflect the SWPPP Exhibit. Provide 2 copies of the SWPPP Report for stamp approval.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Plan Package that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

Further comments may be generated upon re-submittal of the Development Plan Package. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
01/31/2012 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

PROJECT: DP12-0007
5545 E. Broadway Blvd.
Development Package - Site Plan

TRANSMITTAL DATE: 01/30/12

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. DS 2-01.2.4. A title block shall be provided in the lower right quadrant of each sheet.

2. DS 2-01.2.5: Revise the development plan document to include the correct CDRC approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. The link to the stamp can be found here: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp

3. DS 2-01.3.1 The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet.

4. DS 2-01.3.2 The title block shall include the following information.
A. The proposed name of the project or if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name.
B. A brief legal description.
D. The administrative street address.
E. Page number and number of pages. The development package is considered a complete set. Number the pages in sequence for the entire project including site, details, grading, landscape, etc.

5. DS 2-01.3.7.A.4 Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the Land Use Code. List all Land Use Code sections each proposed use is subject to. As follows: General Merchandise Sales "28", subject to: Sec. 3.5.9.2.C and Food Service "28", subject to: Sec. 3.5.4.6.A and .C

6. DS 2-01.3.7.A.6 As a note provide the overlay zones this project has been designed to meet: Sec. 2.8.3 Major Streets and Routes (MS&R)

7. DS 2-01.3.7.A.9.c Provide the percentage of building area expansion for this project.

On the site plan near the entrance to the Major Building an expansion of 432 square feet is indicated. In the same area is an expansion enclosing an open covered area. This must be included on the plans as well as in the expansion calculations.

8. DS 2-01.3.8.B If applicable, all easements shall be shown on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated.

9. DS 2-01.3.8.C Provide the location of the future curb on the site plan. Provide dimensions from the back of future curb to the closest point of the proposed building for both streets, Craycroft and Broadway.

10. DS 2-01.3.9.H.2 Provide the location of existing and future sight visibility triangles.

11. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.c Show all loading zones. It appears that the existing loading zone at the north side of the major building is to remain and an additional loading zone is being added. Provide dimensions of both loading zones. FYI: The loading zone indicated at the east side of the new building is not required and can be removed from the plans. Revise loading zone calculations indicating the number of required loading zones ( 1 is required) and proposed loading zones (2 or 3) are being provided.

12. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Review LUC Sec. 3.3.8 for the number of required short term and long term bicycle parking spaces. The major building would require 15 short term and 7 long term bicycle parking spaces. The new proposed building would require, food services area - 2 short term and 2 long term, the retail portion would require 2 short term and 2 long term. Revise calculations.

Review LUC Sec. 3.3.9.2.B for the design of short term bicycle parking spaces. Minimum distance between racks is 4', each space must be minimum 2' x 6'.

Clearly indicate the required 5' access aisles for both short term and long term bicycle parking spaces.

The indicated class 1 (long term) bicycle parking spaces indicated along the north side of the major building must be physically separated from the vehicle use area either by raised concrete or bollards spaced at no greater than 5' on center. See LUC Sec. 3.3.9.2.A.7.

13. DS 2-01.3.9.R Provide dimensioned widths of all sidewalks on the site plan.

The indicated painted cross walk connecting the existing pedestrian circulation path to the new construction where it passes through the vehicle parking spaces must be constructed of concrete and physically separated from the vehicle use area. See DS 2-08.4.1 and DS 2-08.5.1.C.

14. For clarity please remove all lines indicating existing buildings, curbs, and existing parking spaces which are to be demolished, from the site plan and grading plan.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961

C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\DP12-0007.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents
01/31/2012 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/31/2012 GERARDO BONILLA REJECT SHELF Completed