Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D11-0021
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/13/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/21/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 September 20, 2011 To: Erin Harris STAR Consulting of Arizona, Inc Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: Circle K at Valencia/ Midvale Park Rd Dev. Plan – 2nd submittal D11-0021 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby approves the above referenced submittal of the development plan as submitted. cc: Chad Amateau, PE Checked by:_________ Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 09/23/2011 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D11-0021 Circle K at Valencia and Midvale Park Development Plan (Development Package Process) TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 23, 2011 DUE DATE: October 11, 2011 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 01. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is July 7, 2012. 02. DS 2-01.3.3 - Per your response to the previous comment, a lot split application has been submitted. List the lot split application case number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets. Include a copy of the recorded documentation with the next submittal. 03. This comment has been left as reference requiring the zoning conditions to be added to the development plan as they are made available. Zoning will review for compliance with this standard on the next review of the development package. A portion of previous comment #04, DS 2-01.3.7.A.3 - It is acknowledged that the rezoning case and the development package are being reviewed concurrently and that rezoning conditions are not available. At some time in the future as the rezoning process continues the rezoning conditions will be made available. The conditions will have to be added to the plans and revisions to the DP will have to be made accordingly if necessary prior to final approval of the DP. 04. The previous comment will remain until the recordation has occurred and the recordation information added to the plan. Previous Comment 11 - DS 2-01.3.8.B - Recordation of abandonment of all easements listed as to be abandoned by separate instrument is to be completed prior to final approval of the development plan. 05. Approval by the COT Transportation Bicycle Coordinator Tom Thivener is required if the intent to leave the short term facility as depicted is proposed. Otherwise an approval PDSMR will be required. The entire short term facility must be within the fifty-foot distance and visible from the front door. Neither one of these requirement is met. Previous Comment 20 left as reference specifically related to short term facilities - DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.d - Bicycle parking is required for this development. The number of short and long term spaces is two (2) each. The short term bicycle parking is to be provided within 50 feet of the main entrance tot eh building. Based on the location of the bicycle pad facility it is outside the 50 foot radius (LUC Section 3.3.9.3). Approval may be granted for a greater distance by the PDSD Director based on findings by the COT Transportation Bicycle Coordinator Tom Thivener. The location of the Short term facility is not visible from the main entrance. The location of the facility must be visible and must be relocated unless the Bicycle Coordinator's findings are that the proposed location is consistent with best practices pertaining to siting short-term bicycle racks, particularly in regards to visibility, security, and convenience for bicyclists. Revise the facility location to ensure visibility and distance meet code. 06. Zoning will also approve the grading plan once the development is fully approved. Previous Comment 24 DS 2-01.3.9.M - Zoning has reviewed the grading plan included in the Development Package but has no comments at this time. Due to the first review of the DP and the number of comments not only zoning but other review agencies it appears that the design of the site could or may change. If this is the case the grading plan will have to be revised to reflect the changes and match the site plan. Zoning will review the grading plan on the next submittal and make any applicable comments related to the grading plan. 07. This comment will remain until the rezoning conditions have been provided and added to the development plan. DS 2-01.3.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. List the conditions of rezoning on sheet two (2). 08. After discussion with the Engineering Reviewer it is requested that the site plan on sheet 3 only depict the new information for the development. Removal of all line work that is associated with existing conditions should be removed to provide not so busy drawing as this is not the drawing that is used for construction. 09. Additional comments may or will be forthcoming on the next review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 837-4957 |
| 10/06/2011 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Please provide large scale details of all the different types of sidewalk and curb ramps showing compliance with the ICC/ANSI 117.1 accessibile code, Sections 405 and 406. Please include all dimensions, slopes, landings, flared sides as required and detectable warnings strips where required. a. Several ramps are shown with flared sides that are not drawn with a 1:10 miminum slope. In some of these areas you may want to delete the flared sides and provide return curbs instead. 2. At the accessible parking space detail on sheet 6: a. Show compliance with ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 403.3. b. The 8.4' dimension is either not to scale or is an incorrect dimension. c. Reference comment 1. END OF REVIEW |
| 10/11/2011 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D11-0021 Circle (K) at Valencia-Midvale Park () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: C9-11-10 (Concurrent process with D11-0021) NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Santa Cruz Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Yes COMMENTS DUE BY: October 11, 2011 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER:msp 791-5505 DATE: 10/07/2011 Department of Planning and Development Services Community Planning Comments D11-0021 Circle (K) at Valencia/Midvale Park Road October 07, 2011 The following staff comment(s) are subject to final approval by Mayor and Council on rezoning case C9-11-10. The site is under a concurrent review for both the development plan and rezoning. Pending approval of rezoning case C9-11-10 by Mayor and Council, staff's comments on development plan D11-0021 may generate additional comments or changes that may require additional reviews. Staff offers the following comment at this time: 1. This is a previous comment made by staff and remains a requirement, prior to development plan approval, if the access and/or PAAL utilized to access Valencia Road remains off-site then provide documentation securing an ingress-egress access agreement with the adjacent property located to the east. |
| 10/11/2011 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/11/2011 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/13/2011 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES October 13, 2011 Erin Harris STAR Consulting of Arizona Inc. 5405 E. Placita Hayuco Tucson, Arizona 18 Subject: D11-0021 CIRCLE K @ VALENICA/MIDVALE Development Package Dear Erin: Your submittal of July 8, 2011 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 5 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Development Package (Zoning, H/C Site, Planning, Addressing, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/ Via fax: 529-1240 |
| 10/13/2011 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: D11-0021 CIRCLE K AT VALENCIA AND MIDVALE PARK/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: October 11, 2011 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. On the Final Development Plan fill in the parcel for Development Package Notes #2. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar or bond paper of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. |