Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D11-0021
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/08/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/08/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | Not a COT owned/operated property |
| 07/11/2011 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 07/15/2011 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D11-0021 Circle K at Valencia and Midvale Park Development Plan (Development Package Process) TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 15, 2011 DUE DATE: August 5, 2011 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 01. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is July 7, 2012. 02. DS 2-01.3.3 - This project has been submitted under the CDRC development package process to include a concurrent review for Rezoning, development and grading plans. List the following case numbers in the lower right corner of all plan sheets, Rezoning case number C9-11-10, and Development plan number D11-0021, Grading plan number T11BU00920. At this time it is not clear if a requirement for a plat is necessary due to possible land split that may occur due to the proposed rezoning boundary. Additional comments and review may be required on the next review or based on the response to this comment. Are any portions of the Carondolet parcel being split and added to the Circle K parcel? If so a lot split or plat may be required. At a minimum, a lot reconfiguration could be required and should be processed as part of the development package review and approval process. 03. DS 2-01.3.7.A.2 - As of this review it is not clear if the actual area of the property is 1.35 acres as per the Pima County Assessor's records or 1.78 acres as listed on the development plan. There is no application approval of a lot split or indication that one is proposed or if it has recently occurred. Based on the history of the site and the pre-submittal meeting notes a tentative and final plat will be required in addition to just the DP. This issue will have to be resolved prior to re-submittal of the development package. Contact Patricia Gehlen for the proper submittal requirements if the TP and FP are required. 04. DS 2-01.3.7.A.3 - Revise zoning note #5 as follows. The rezoning case prefix letters listed for the case are for a board of adjustment case. The rezoning case number assigned to this project is C9-11-10. Correct Zoning note #5 as required. Add the rezoning case number in the lower right corner of all the plan sheets. It is acknowledged that the rezoning case and the development package are being reviewed concurrently and that rezoning conditions are not available. At some time in the future as the rezoning process continues the rezoning conditions will be made available. The conditions will have to be added to the plans and revisions to the DP will have to be made accordingly if necessary prior to final approval of the DP. 05. DS 2-10.3.7.A.6.a - At this time, no modification or variance process has been identified or is required. Additional comments with regards to this standard may or could be forthcoming based on rezoning conditions and any changes to the design of the project. 06. DS 2-01.3.7.A.6.b - Include under zoning note 8 or add a new note that indicates that this project has been designed to comply with Gateway Route requirement LUC Section 2.8.4. (Valencia Road is designated as a Gateway Route on the COT Major Streets and Routes Map.) 07. DS 2-01.3.7.A.7 - This property is subject to compliance with annexation C9-83-34 requirements. Provide As reference the annexation case number (C9-83-34) in the lower right corner of all plan sheets. Conditions of approval do not have to be listed as the proposed rezoning conditions will probably supersede the annexation conditions. 08. DS 2-01.3.7.A.8 - No application for a TP and FP has been applied for therefore as of this review a subdivision case number has not been assigned to this project. A tentative and subdivision plat will be required for the overall site that is affected by the proposed land division. Once the subdivision application case number has been assigned to this project, list the case number in the lower right corner of the sheets. 09. DS 2-01.3.7.A.9 - At this time this plan has been reviewed as a separate development plan which includes only the area to be rezoned and the use on the area. The tentative plat will have to address all uses on the site that is to be re-platted. Additional info will be required on the tentative plat plan. 10. DS 2-01.3.8.A and DS 2-01.3.9.A - After reviewing the legal description and comparing it to the site plan on sheet 3 it is clear that the description does not match the drawing distance and bearing information. Please ensure that the legal description and the drawing info are consistent. (I have been made aware that a subdivision plat is required for this project and that a TP and FP will be processed.) 11. DS 2-01.3.8.B - Recordation of abandonment of all easements listed as to be abandoned by separate instrument is to be completed prior to final approval of the development plan (TP/FP). The abandonment recordation information must be labeled on the development plan or on the tentative plat/final plat. Clarify what the note related to the "EX 4 PVT SEWER" means (2 places): The notes state that the sewer is to be removed or abandoned in place, is the note intended to mean that the sewer will be abandoned but not removed? Please clarify. Key note 15 (slope easement) could not be verified on sheet 4. Add the key note in the appropriate location as shown on sheet 3. 12. DS 2-01.3.8.C - As of this review it is not clear whether additional right of way may be required by COT Transportation. As the rezoning processes proceeds and moves forward conditions of rezoning will be generated where by the possibility of additional right of way may be required by COT Transportation. Additional comments may be forthcoming with regards to this development standard. Building setbacks, landscape and screening placement, access points, sight visibility triangles etc may be affected and may have to be adjusted or revised. Ensure that all right of way information for both Midvale Park Rd. and Valencia Rd. is added to the site plan, curb to property line dimensions, sidewalk width and location, etc. Additional comments may be forthcoming on this standard and its affected requirements. 13. DS 2-01.3.9.B and DS 2-01.3.9.E - The need for a Tentative and Final Plat has been mentioned in several comments above and will be a requirement due to the number of splits of the original parcel or block. At some point in this process the development plan will become a development plan/tentative plat that will include the overall parcels that are to be included in the plat and all lot lines with distance and bearings will have to be added. Lot numbers will have to be labeled based on the new lot line reconfigurations or splits. Additional Comments may be forthcoming on this standard. 14. DS 2-01.3.9.C - If the subdivision will have common areas, label the areas accordingly and include the common area designations and use in the title block 15. DS 2-01.3.9.D - If applicable to this project label and delineate in a surveyable manner any Natural Undisturbed Open Space. 16. DS 2-01.3.9.F - In reviewing the re-zoning application package and the map delineated as the area to be rezoned it appears that either there was an error in the map delineation or this development plan does not include the entire area that is to be rezoned. The map in the rezoning package includes the whole Carondolet property to be rezoned. I'm sure this is an error but at a minimum the PAAL or vehicular use area that is on the Carondolet property along the east and south sides of the Circle K property will have to be rezoned to C-2 if access is not provided directly off Midvale or Valencia. Please clarify what areas ate to be rezoned C-2. Please be aware that access from an O-3 zone which does not allow Retail sales cannot be used for accessing a C-2 property. In addition if the vehicular areas along the south and east sides of the Circle K are not to become part of the property through a re-platting process the vehicular areas have to be rezoned to C-2 and cross access agreements between the Circle K and the Carondolet owners will be required. Additional comments may be forthcoming based on the response and revisions to the development plan. 17. DS 2-01.3.9.G - As of this review it is not clear what the rezoning area is or if it involves additional development on the Carondolet property. Additional comments may be forthcoming related to this development standard based on the response to the zoning comments and the revisions to the development plan. 18. DS 2-01.3.9.H - If applicable due to additional right of way dedication, draw and label existing and future sight visibility triangles. 19. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.a - Label and dimension the parallel parking spaces along the north side of the canopy structure. The width and length of a parallel parking space is 8 feet by 23 feet respectively. Label the information requested. 20. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.d - Bicycle parking is required for this development. The number of short and long term spaces is two (2) each. The short term bicycle parking is to be provided within 50 feet of the main entrance tot eh building. Based on the location of the bicycle pad facility it is outside the 50 foot radius (LUC Section 3.3.9.3). Approval may be granted for a greater distance by the PDSD Director based on findings by the COT Transportation Bicycle Coordinator Tom Thivener. The location of the Short term facility is not visible from the main entrance. The location of the facility must be visible and must be relocated unless the Bicycle Coordinator's findings are that the proposed location is consistent with best practices pertaining to siting short-term bicycle racks, particularly in regards to visibility, security, and convenience for bicyclists. Revise the facility location to ensure visibility and distance meet code. Two (2) long term bicycle parking spaces are required for this development. If the facilities are to be provided inside the building detail drawings must be provided demonstrating how the location of the bicycle spaces complies with the requirements in LUC 3.3.9.4. Dimensioned detail drawings for both facilities must be provided on the plans. 21. DS 2-01.3.9.I - If applicable as a condition of rezoning draw, label and dimension any area required for right of way dedication. 22. DS 2-01.3.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of -way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) 23. DS 2-01.3.9.K - If applicable as a rezoning condition, identify and provide dimensions, approximate areas in square footage, and purposes of any lots proposed for dedication (such as open spaces, recreation areas, or natural areas) or for reservation for a public use (such as public parks, water facilities, or school sites). 24. DS 2-01.3.9.M - Zoning has reviewed the grading plan included in the Development Package but has no comments at this time. Due to the first review of the DP and the number of comments not only zoning but other review agencies it appears that the design of the site could or may change. If this is the case the grading plan will have to be revised to reflect the changes and match the site plan. Zoning will review the grading plan on the next submittal and make any applicable comments related to the grading plan. 25. DS 2-01.3.9.O - Provide a building setback from the west wall of the Store based on the applicable building setback requirement (based on developing area, ADT LUC 3.2.6.5.B). 26. DS 2-01.3.9.R - Per DS 2-08.3.1, within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation path is required. This path must connect all public access areas of the development and the pedestrian located in any adjacent streets. Provide a continuous sidewalk directly to the dumpster. It appears by the site and landscape plan that the sidewalk falls short of the dumpster. Follow up with comments by Ron Brown for accessible routes and requirements for those routes which may include ramps and truncated domes. Per DS 2-08.4.1, a sidewalk will be provided adjacent and parallel to any PAAL on the side where the buildings are located, see figure 1 in DS 2-08. This requirement applies to the location adjacent to the south side of the Convenience Store. The sidewalk must connect to the onsite pedestrian circulation and if required accessible requirements must be incorporated. 27. DS 2-01.3.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. List the conditions of rezoning on sheet two (2). 28. DS 2-01.3.9.V - If applicable identify the location and type of mail box service to be provided for this development. If mail is to be delivered directly inside to the occupants state as a note or keynote. 29. DS 2-01.3.9.W - Draw the existing Circle K sign that is located in the northwest corner of the site and is expected to remain. It appears that the symbol for the sign was left out on sheet 3. 30. DS 2-01.3.9.X - Refer to the Landscape reviewer comments for requirements related to landscape buffers, screening, water harvesting tree planting within the parking lot, and screening. 31. Additional comments will forthcoming on the next review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 837-4957 DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D110021dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 07/15/2011 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Review conducted by Zelin Canchola TDOT Traffic approves development plan as shown. Eliminate Thad Harvinson's name, e-mail, and number on Note 19 (Streets and Roads Notes page 1 of 12). insert "contact 791-5100" for all right-of-way requirements and permit applications. |
| 07/19/2011 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | D11-0021 & C9-11-10 CIRCLE K AT VALENCIA AND MIDVALE PARK RD Regional Traffic Engineering has no comment on this submittal and recommends approval of the development. It will have no impact on any existing ADOT facilities. Thank you. Monica M. Soto Government Intern Arizona Department of Transportation Tucson District MSoto@azdot.gov<mailto:MSoto@azdot.gov> |
| 07/20/2011 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#239195 July 20, 2011 Star Consulting of AZ Inc Attn: Erin Harris 5405 E Placita Hayuco Tucson, Arizona 85718 Dear Erin : SUBJECT: Circle K at Valencia and Midvale D11-0021 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted July 8, 2011. It appears there is a conflict with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Transformer and J-2 in way of new construction. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. ricahrd Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 07/20/2011 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 July 15, 2011 To: Erin Harris Star Consulting of Arizona, Inc. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: Circle K at Valencia/Midvale Park Rd Dev. Plan – 1st submittal D11-0021 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: Obtain a letter from the PCRWRD’s Development Liaison Unit, written within the past year, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/developer.htm#permits The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Sheet 1: Show in the Legend a symbol for proposed sewer. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd ) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. cc: Chad Amateau, PE Checked by:_________ Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 07/20/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | From: Malini Banerjee, Pima Association of Governments Subject: CIRCLE K AT VALENCIA AND MIDVALE PARK RD D11-0021 & C9-11-10 There is no objection regarding the trip generation. |
| 07/21/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Please provide required accessible curb ramps and detectable warning strips for any pedestrian access to the dumpster as required by Zoning. 2. At the accessible parking layout: a. The signage must be located on the center line of each parking space. b. There must be a minimum of a 3' deep landing at the top of the curb ramp from the edge of the open door. This is as per ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 406.3 and 402, 3' minimum. Zoning requires a minimum of 4' for pedestrian ways. Confer with Zoning. 3. What is "12:1 Slope Max" indicated on the walkway East of the building? Walkways with more than 5% slope are ramps and must comply with section 405 including all required landings and handrails. Please clarify and provide all large scale plans of any required ramps. 4. The reference notes 4 and 5 refer to parking requirements (sections 1106 and 502) and are referenced to walk areas. Please reconcile. 5. Please reconcile note 7 references to sections 45 and 406N. There are no such sections. Perhaps section 406 is the correct section. 6. Provide a marked crossing between the two new curb ramps located at the South West side of the building. a. Clarify the connection from the Westerly curb ramp to the Midvale right of way. 7. At the long marked crossing to the Valencia pedestrian right of way: a. Provide a curb ramp and detectable at the North end of the crossing where it connects to the existing pedestrian way. b. Insure all lateral slopes comply with ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 403.3, 5% maximum or provide ramps as per section 405 with railings and landings as required. END OF REVIEW |
| 07/27/2011 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: D11-0021 CIRCLE K AT VALENCIA AND MIDVALE PARK/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: July 26, 2011 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Does this project also include parcel 138-24-0101J? If not, please delete from Development Package Notes #2. Delete all street directions on sheet 3. Change Book 3 to Book 36 on all title blocks. |
| 08/03/2011 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: August 3, 2011 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Circle K, 1555 W. Valencia Rd. Development Package D11-0021 (First Review) T15S, R13E, Section 15 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Package. The Development Package (DP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Package: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. In general, for final approval, all blanks must be filled in or removed from the DP. 3. Change the title block of sheet 7 to match the other sheets. 4. Provide cross-sections of the parking lot/area to show the recommendations of the geotechnical report. 5. If grading note is correct, how does any drainage cross the sidewalk? Provide a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used to convey the 10-year event. 6. It appears that the seal and signature have been scanned and attached to each sheet. The mylars submitted for the approval signatures must be individually signed by the engineer of record. 7. General Notes. The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. D.S. 2-01.3.7. The relocation and construction of the exist catch basin will disturb area in the floodplain. Edit Drainage Note no. 14 to reflect the following note: 2. If applicable, list the following notes and complete the blanks. "This project is affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations." b. "A floodplain use permit and/or finished floor elevation certificates are required for the following lots: __________." (List the lots affected by lot number, or in the case of a one (1) lot development, place a period after the word "required" and delete the remainder of note. C. Streets and Roads Notes. 1. Edit note no. 19. Thad Harvison is no longer employed by the City of Tucson. He has joined the lucky ranks of the retired. Call TDOT for the replacement information. 8. Existing Site Conditions. The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within fifty (50) feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of fifty (50) feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. D.S. 2-01.3.8. B. All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. This comment pertains to the existing easements that are to be abandoned. C. The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. F. Existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site will be shown. H. Conditions on adjacent land significantly affecting the design of the project will be shown, such as the approximate direction and gradients of ground slope; character and location of adjacent development; and drainageways, arroyos, ditches, and channels, including their existing conditions. The conditions shown do not match what is actually in the field. 9. Information on Proposed Development. The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. D.S. 2-01.3.9. A. Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. B. Identify each block or lot by number within the subdivision boundary and include the approximate square footage of each, or a note may be provided stating that all lots comply with the minimum lot size requirements. C. If the project has common areas, label each common area individually with a separate letter designation. Enclose with a solid line each common area, private street, etc., that will have separate restrictions, a separate homeowners' association, or any common area that is separated by a public right-of-way. D. Delineate proposed Natural Undisturbed Open Space (NUOS) in a surveyable manner. E. Proposed land splits or existing lot lines shall be drawn on the plan with dimensions and the identification number and approximate square footage of each lot. (Please be aware that, if land division occurs and the number of lots falls within the definition of subdivision, a subdivision plat is required.) F. All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two (2) or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. G. If the project is to be phased, provide calculations, setbacks, etc., to indicate that each phase complies with all requirements as a separate entity. Show phase lines on the drawing. Show and label any temporary improvements that may be needed to make the site function for each phase as one entity. If such temporary improvements are off the site of the phase under consideration, a temporary easement or other legal documentation to assure legal use of the property is required. Note recording information. H. Proposed traffic circulation: 1. Proposed traffic circulation will be designed in accordance with Street Development Standard 3-01.0, to include streets, intersections, street names, right-of-way widths, curve radii of centerlines and curb returns, and proposed improvements, such as pavement, curbs, access points (driveways), handicap ramps, and sidewalks. Street improvements, such as sidewalks, curbs, pavement, and handicap ramps, do not need to be drawn on the plan if such information is provided on typical street cross sections. Please be aware that, if a new street is created (for other than for subdivisions) which divides the property into two (2) or more lots, a subdivision plat is required (refer to the definition of subdivision in Sec. 4.1.2 of the LUC). 2. Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 3. Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability. 4. Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. 5. If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Sec. 3.3.0 of the LUC and Development Standard 3-05.0. b. If any of the required parking is located off -site as permitted by the LUC, a drawing of that parking area is to be provided, together with the City's required parking agreement (include a copy of the lease agreement if applicable). Please remember that in these situations, if the off-site parking location is a new parking area, it must comply with all parking area requirements and must be allowed as a principal use by the zoning classification of that property. If the off-site parking area location is an existing parking lot, the parking spaces utilized for the proposed land use must be nonrequired parking for the existing use for which the parking area was established. c. Show all loading zones, and vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route, and provide, as a note, the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, and the design vehicle. I. Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development package documents have been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes. Projects bounded by streets having only a portion of the right-of-way width dedicated will be required to dedicate right-of-way, up to one-half (½), to complete the street width. Should there be any proposed street or alley vacation, provide this information. If vacation has occurred, include the recording information. J. If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of -way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) L. All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. N. In conjunction with a drainage report or statement, as applicable, prepared inaccordance with the City Engineer's instructions and procedures, the following information will be indicated on the development package documents. For additional information regarding drainage standards, see the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management. 4. Indicate all proposed ground elevations at different points on each lot to provide reference to future grading and site drainage. 5. Verification will be provided that any drainage solutions which occur outside the boundaries of the development document area are constructed with adjacent owners' permission. (Additional notarized documentation of that approval will be submitted with the drainage report.) 7. Draw locations and indicate types of off-site runoff acceptance points and/or onsite runoff discharge points. O. All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. The distance between the prop. line and the face of curb on a 150' MS and R R/W is 12'. T. Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Development Standard 3-01.0. Show the refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Development Standard 6-01.0. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that Standard, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm. The refuse enclosure does not meet the new standards recently adopted. Along with the detail of the refuse enclosure, the detail number shall be called out. Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. During a recent site visit it was noted that the drainage way is in dire need of maintenance. The DR can be approved under the condition that the drainage way be brought back up to original conditions. 3. Include the maintenance agreement on the DP. 4. The geotechnical report recommends removal of fill. Notes and cross sections showing the recommendations shall be shown on the plan. 5. With the proximity of the work next to the flood plain there will be some disturbance within it. Therefore, a flood plain use permit will be required. SWPPP: 1. Relocate the concrete wash-out and hazardous material storage areas per R18-9-B301. Type 1 General Permit: L. A 1.12 General Permit allows the discharge of wastewater resulting from washing concrete from trucks, pumps, and ancillary equipment to an impoundment if the following conditions are met: 1. The person holds an AZPDES Construction General Permit authorizing the concrete washout activities; 2. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan required by the Construction General Permit issued according to 18 A.A.C. 9, Article 9, Part C, for the construction activity addresses the concrete washout activities; 3. The vegetation at the soil base of the impoundment is cleared, grubbed, and compacted to uniform density not less than 95 percent. If the impoundment is located above grade, the berms or dikes are compacted to a uniform density not less than 95 percent; 4. If groundwater is less than 20 feet below land surface, the impoundment is lined with a synthetic liner at least 30 mils thick; 5. The impoundment is located at least 50 feet from any storm drain inlet, open drainage facility, or watercourse and 100 feet from any water supply well; 6. The impoundment is designed and operated to maintain adequate freeboard to prevent overflow or discharge of wastewater; 7. The concrete washout wastewater from any wash pad is routed to the impoundment; 8. The impoundment receives only concrete washout wastewater; 9. The annual average daily flow of wastewater to the impoundment is less than 3000 gallons per day; and 10. The following closure requirements are met. a. The facility is closed by removing and appropriately disposing of any liquids remaining in the impoundment, b. The area is graded to prevent ponding of water, and c. Closure activities are completed before filing of the Notice of Termination under the AZPDES Construction General Permit. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson - Planning and Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/1555 W. Valencia Rd. Dev. Pkg. |
| 08/05/2011 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | |
| 08/05/2011 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) The site is required to provide a 5' masonry wall along the property boundaries to provide screening. LUC Table 3.7.2-1 The codes offers an exception to this requirement where the vehicular use area is jointly used between properties. This exception could extend to include adjacent access easements where properly documented. The Development Plan indicates an existing easement along the west boundary to be abandoned and replaced. The Landscape Plan indicates an existing access easement along the west and southern boundaries, with no mention of abandonment. Revise all plans to coordinate and show correct easement information and provide screen walls if necessary. 2) Sheets 7 & 8 of the package have the wrong title block. Revise as necessary. 3) Add any necessary reference case numbers to the landscape and other plans. |
| 08/05/2011 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D11-0021 Circle (K) at Valencia-Midvale Park () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: C9-11-10 (Concurrent process with D11-0021) NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Santa Cruz Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: August 5, 2011 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER:msp 791-5505 DATE: 07/28/2011 Department of Planning and Development Services Community Planning Comments D11-0021 Circle (K) at Valencia/Midvale Park Road July 28, 2011 The following staff comments are subject to final approval by Mayor and Council of rezoning case C9-11-10. The site is under current review for both the development plan and rezoning. Pending approval of rezoning case C9-11-10 by Mayor and Council, staff's comments on development plan D11-0021 may generate additional comments or changes that may require additional reviews: 1. Hydro-seed the full length of the on-site drainage-way (except for the sandy bottom flow channel) with a native seed mix and provide a temporarily ground-surface irrigated system until germination has occurred on no less than 75% of hydro-seeded area. 2. That area of the site located north and west of the on-site drainage way shall be landscaped with plants, shrubs, trees, and the ground area not covered by plant material shall be covered with decomposed granite (DG). The area shall be covered 75% by plant material and 25% by DG. The color of the DG shall be complementary in color with the surroundings. 3. On-site landscape plants and shrubs to be located between the Valencia Road right-of-way and the on-site drainage shall not exceed 36 inches in height at maturity. The additional trees required shall be placed to enhance the Gateway corridor of Valencia Road while preserving visibility of the existing and proposed signage. New trees may include miniature acacia type trees to minimize sign obstruction. 4. That area of the site located north and west of the on-site drainage way shall include a permanent landscape irrigation system (except for the drainage way), monthly maintenance by a licensed landscape contractor, and preservation of existing trees. 5. The convenience store and the gas island canopy shall be of earth tone colors and the gas island pillars to include western block split-face façades. 6. Provide a landscape plan to address LUC landscape requirements, in addition, the landscape plan to include landscaping improvements as outlined in these comments, from Community Planning staff. 7. All exterior mechanical equipment shall be screened from view from the surrounding roadways and properties. 8. Prior to development plan approval, if the access and PAAL from Valencia Road remains off-site then provide documentation securing an ingress-egress access agreement with the adjacent property located to the east. 9. The proposed freestanding monument sign to be located at the northeast corner of the site seems to be shown on the preliminary development to be in the drainage way. Please correct location of sign to be out of the drainage way. 10. Graffiti shall be removed within five working days of discovery. 11. Provide sign elevations drawn to scale of the existing freestanding monument sign and the two proposed freestanding monument signs. |
| 08/08/2011 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/08/2011 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 08/08/2011 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 08/08/2011 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | I have no issues with this proposal. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept 837-7428 |
| 08/08/2011 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 08/09/2011 | FRODRIG2 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | Date Case Number Project Address August 8, 2011 D11-0021 CIRCLE-K AT Valencia and Midvale Development Plan Comments: The proposed Development Plan for the CIRCLE-K, located at 1555 W. Valencia Road and Midvale Park, Case No. D11-0021, meets the minimum requirements for Environmental Services, Solid Waste Disposal and Recycle materials Standard 6-01.0 and is here Approved. Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 |
| 08/09/2011 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 9, 2011 Erin Harris STAR Consulting of Arizona, Inc. 5405 E. Placita Hayuco Tucson, Arizona 18 Subject: D11-0021 CIRCLE K AT VALENCIA MIDVALE Development Package Dear Erin: Your submittal of July 8, 2011 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 8 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Package (Zoning, Wastewater, Zoning HC, Addressing, Engineering, Landscape, Planning, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies Elevations of Proposed & Existing Monument Signs (Planning, PDSD) 2 Copies Parking Lease Agreement Documents* (Engineering, PDSD) 1 Check Made out to “Pima County Treasurer” for $50 (Wastewater) *If Applicable Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/ Via fax: 529-1240 |