Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D10-0024
Review Name: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/08/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/09/2011 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 02/14/2011 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | DATE: February 14, 2011 TO: RICK Engineering, Bruce Paton, P.E. REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, PE SUBJECT: Nordies Rack Development Package Engineering Review - Revision #1 ADDRESS: 4302 N Oracle Rd, Home Depot Retail Center lot 9 LOCATION: T13S R13E Sec24 REZONING CASE: C9-82-48 FLOODPLAIN STATUS: X-unshaded zone, 1636K CASE NUMBER: D10-0024, T10BU01213 SUMMARY: The Revision to development package was submitted for the Nordies Rack Home Depot Retail Center Lot 9 improvements. Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revision for the Development Package including plan sheets 1, 7, 8, 10, 10A and Geotechnical Addendum No.5 (Western Technologies Inc., Justin Heineke P.E. R.G. 8-30-10). A meeting was held Wednesday, January 05, 2011 at 1:00 PM with PDSD Engineering, CDRC, RICK Engineering, and Sayler-Brown to go over proposed revisions (mostly field changes) to the Development Package grading plan sheets. A phone conference was held 11FEB11 with Anthony Boone from RICK to go over the changes on the sheets. Engineering Division recommends approval of the Revision #1 of the approved Development Package with the following conditions still needing to be addressed prior to final grading permit inspection approval. See clarification on condition item 11. GRADING PERMIT CONDITIONS: The following 11 grading permit conditions still apply to grading permit T10BU01213: 1) There shall be no stockpiling, vehicular parking/storage, placement or storage of construction material, washout areas, staging, or other non-authorized activities within the basin or waterharvesting areas. Retention basin soil compaction could lead to infiltration function issues as well as delays in project closure. Post construction percolation testing may be required with re-engineering & reconstruction of basins to show compliance with minimum drain-down times. 2) Geotechnical toedown and west slope of eastern basins must be constructed in a manner that minimizes disturbance and compaction of basin bottom. 3) Call PDSD Engineering for special Inspections during the construction of any toedowns and other subsurface improvements. 4) A Temporary Traffic Control Plan may be necessary if/as needed by Inspector or EOR to reduce conflicts between public access to the Home Depot shopping center and construction vehicles & project activity. In order to provide inspection clarification and prevent onsite traffic conflicts, temporary traffic controls may be needed to clarify between continued commercial uses/access and construction access / maneuverability. Install construction access-only signage, or other controls, if/as needed. 5) For inspection purposes, post City of Tucson's "AZPDES - Posting Requirements" green sheet, or the NOI at construction entrance of the site, at beginning of construction activities, and maintain this posted document throughout project construction. 6) Call for Pre-construction meeting once grading activity is expected to start. For a PDSD Engineering Inspection, call IVR (740-6970), or schedule with a Customer Service Representative at Planning & Development Services Department, or contact DSD Engineering at 837-4888, or schedule inspections online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Online_Services/Online_Permits/online_permits.html 7) Provide sequential list of grading construction activities for this project. The sequence of major activities should state whether establishment of erosion and stormwater controls are to occur prior to clearing and rough grading of this site. 8) After interim SWPPP controls are removed, permanent erosion control are required on all disturbed areas, in the form of vegetative cover, gravel, a sized decorative rock, and/or other controls, or as shown on the plans. 9) Any revisions to the Grading Plan must be reviewed by the PDSD Engineering Engineer and may include discussion, details, or a revised grading plan. Call PDSD Engineering at 791-5550 to discuss any revisions. 10) If grading construction is expected to last longer than the expiration date of the grading permit, contact PDSD to renew/extend the Grading Permit. If Final Grading Inspection has not been completed before the Grading Permit expires, and the permit has not been renewed, additional fees and reviews may be required. Requests for grading permit extensions are found online and may be submitted to Planning & Development Services Department, prior to grading permit expiration date, for consideration of grading plan extension approval. 11) As-builts are required to be submitted under the activity number T10BU01213 to the permit clerks. They will be reviewed and then if acceptable, a copy will be provided to the PDSD Engineering Inspector for final grading inspections. For Grading Permit Project Closure documentation, submit: one copy of original grading plans, 2 copies of as-builts, letters of completion (one for basins and another for substantial completion of the project). Include geotechnical field reports for west basin areas. If you have questions, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 02/14/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Oracle Wetmore Retail Center Development Package (Revision) D10-0024 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 14, 2011 DUE DATE: February 24, 2011 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The Zoning Review Section approves the development plan for this project. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D10-0024 |
| 02/15/2011 | FRODRIG2 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | Date Case Number Project Address February 15, 2011 D10-0024 Oracle Wetmore Retail Center DEVELOPMENT PLAN Comments: The proposed Development Plan for the Oracle Wetmore Retail Center Case No. D10-0024. Meets the minimum requirements for the Environmental Services, Solid Waste Disposal and Recycle Materials Standard 6-01, and is Approved. Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/16/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/22/2011 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/23/2011 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES February 23, 2011 Thomas Sayler-Brown SBBL 2704 E. Elm St. Tucson, Arizona 85711 Subject: D10-0024 Development Package Revision Dear Thomas: The above referenced development package has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED by the Community Design Review Committee. Please submit the following documents for sign-off. 1 Rolled blue line SET of the affected sheets of the Development Package. Please include applicable sheets from any other concurrent reviews. 1 CD that contains all of the drainage/hydrology and other reports submitted for the review and approval of this plan. Additional black line copies will be made from the complete set and distributed to various review agencies for their files. These copies will be ordered from the City's contracted print company and billed to you unless you already have an account at another printing company. Please let us know which printing company you would prefer to use and list them on your attached transmittal form when submitting your mylars to the CDRC office for sign-off approval. The printing company will deliver the original rolled blue line to your office. If you are out of town you will need to contact the printing company for pick up or mailing arrangement options. PLEASE HAVE THE CITY OF TUCSON APPROVAL STAMP PLACED ON EACH SHEET OF THE SUBMITTAL SET, PREFERABLY IN THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER NEAR THE TITLE BLOCK. THE STAMP IS LOCATED AT http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/CDRC___Rezoning/CDRC/CDRC_Stamp/cdrc_stamp.html. BLUELINE SETS THAT DO NOT HAVE THE STAMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR CORRECTION. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 620-0535 |